ipl-logo

Principles Of Miranda Vs Arizona Democracy

569 Words3 Pages

The Five Principles of Democracy in the Miranda vs. Arizona Case The foundation of democracy is set on a base of five principles. These principles are set to aid and ensure the success of democracy and to make certain that the rights of every American are upheld and protected. The five benefits or principles of democracy are that it allows people to make their own choices (elections, religion, public opinion, job, etc.), each person's dignity and worth are recognized and respected, it fosters respect for the law, protects the right of the minority, and it fashions policies that promote the public good. The Miranda vs. Arizona case is an example of law enforcement violating the constitutional rights of an American. This case began in 1963 and ended in 1966 when the Supreme Court ruled that all detained criminal suspects should be informed of their constitutional rights to an attorney and against self incrimination. In this case, the Supreme Court implemented a few of the foundations of democracy to come to a verdict such as the one in this case which was to ensure that the rights of every …show more content…

Before the police interrogation, which lasted two hours, Miranda was not informed of his rights which therefore caused him to be interrogated without an attorney present and it led him to self-incriminate himself. The trial “ consisted solely of his confession” (Alex Mcbride n.d.) which caused the court to convict Miranda of rape and kidnapping, sentencing him to 20-30 years in prison. Miranda then went to the Arizona Supreme Court appealing that his confession was unconstitutionally obtained and used against him. When the court disagreed he appealed to the U.S Supreme Court where they declared the actions of law enforcement unconstitutional because they violated the constitution's fifth and sixth amendment. Because of this, Miranda's confession could not be admissible in a court of

Show More
Related

  • Research Paper On Miranda Vs Arizona

    305 Words  | 2 Pages

    Miranda v. Arizona In 1966 Ernest Miranda was arrested at his home and taken to a police station where he was identified by the complaining witness. After a 2 hour interrogation he was found guilty of kidnapping and rape. He confessed all of this without being read his rights. The police did not read him his rights that are stated in the 5th amendment.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

    694 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman when she was walking home from work in Phoenix, Arizona. Ernesto Miranda was arrested and asked a series of questions about the incident. He was questioned for two hours by the police until he confessed to his crimes. The police had unconstitutionally obtained Miranda’s confession. While Ernesto was being questioned he was not informed of the fifth amendment which protects one from being held accountable for committing a crime without being properly informed of one’s rights, and sixth amendment that promises citizens a speedy trial, a fair jury, and an attorney.

    Read More

  • Summary: The Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

    1089 Words  | 5 Pages

    At trail, over the objections of Miranda’s defense attorney, prosecutor’s used both the written statement and police testimony of Miranda’s oral confession to secure a guilty verdict from the jury. Miranda was sentenced to 20 to 30 years of prison for each charge. The main legal issue in the case was if Miranda’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination were violated when Phoenix detectives, after his arrest but prior to interrogation, failed to inform his of his rights; The right to remain silent, to consult and

    Read More

  • Ernesto Miranda Legal Brief

    1061 Words  | 5 Pages

    Later he got 20 to 30 years in prison for assaulting and armed robbery. Later his lawyer appealed to the United States Supreme Court of Arizona asking if he was given the rights while being arrested. On June 13, 1966 their appeal was accepted and the court agreed on hearing him because as it turns out he was interrogated for 2 hours without knowing that he has the right to remain silent (5th Amendment) (United States Courts, 2017), and the right for a lawyer (6th Amendment). “Miranda v. Arizona” was called that because the police made a mistake and it was the police of Arizona which made it go farther to the Supreme Court which is bigger that's why the state counts. (United States Courts, 2014).This is why the case began.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona Bashlor

    1193 Words  | 5 Pages

    Arizona case is an important case that deals with Miranda given a confession without being stated his rights to him in a way that he could understand them. Miranda was one of many accused individuals that gave a statement without having his rights being read to him. The U.S. Supreme Court set aside Miranda?s confession because it was inquired through an improper interrogation. Arizona retried Miranda, and the confession was not listed as evidence against him, but his wife gave a statement only after he sued for the custody of his daughter. Then he was sentenced to twenty to thirty years in prison.

    Read More

  • Terry V. Ohio Tests The Limitations Of The Fourth Amendment

    841 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court argued that the police officer had reasonable suspicion and searching the men was in the best interest of the officer for his protection. It was an eight to one decision, the one being William Douglas. He argued that they were giving too much power to police, and that there should be a court order for search and seizure. In this time period, stop and frisks were an everyday thing. Law enforcement broke the fourth amendment most of the time, abusing their badge that allowed them to search who they want, when they want, whether they were acting a certain way or not.

    Read More

  • Miranda V. Arizona Case Study

    893 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Miranda v. Arizona” is a case that was presented in the high court in the United States of America. The case addresses four distinct cases that may be considered identical. Each of the four cases involved defendants who were interrogated by the police officers, prosecuting attorney or detectives where they were forced to give information about various crimes committed as they were identified as the suspects. Miranda, who was a Mexican immigrant, was identified by a Phoenix woman as one of the perpetrators who kidnapped and raped her. This resulted to an arrest that was followed by a police interrogation that was carried out for two hours (Vander, & Kamisar, 2013).

    Read More

  • What Was Miranda's Argument In The Miranda V. Arizona Case?

    697 Words  | 3 Pages

    For two hours, he was interrogated and bullied into writing a confession of his crime. , Question #1 , What was Miranda’s argument in Miranda v Arizona case? The argument of the case was that he had not been informed of his constitutional rights to remain silent or have a lawyer present. Therefore, what I think about this that even though you were not read your rights, but consequently since you had done something wrong they do have higher priority over you. I believe he is guilty because of his past criminal records.

    Read More

  • Miranda Vs Dickerson

    188 Words  | 1 Pages

    I think it is important to distinguish between the Dickerson and Miranda cases. Miranda was a state case, Dickerson was a Federal case. Congress enacted §3501 as a federal statute that in a nutshell addresses the “voluntariness” of a suspects statements, whether they were Mirandized or not. The Dickerson decision, which reversed a lower court’s decision, has caused much debate in the legal and academia communities as to whether the Supreme Court decided correctly. Many argue that Miranda was not constitutional based, but judicial common law, and §3501provides as much, or more protection to the accused.

    Read More

  • Miranda V. Arizona Case Study

    1745 Words  | 7 Pages

    In addition the court stated, “Miranda’s mental capacity also played a role in the Court’s decision to hear the case. ”(Falk, 65 Term No. 419 Misc.) Also, they never told Miranda his rights when he was arrested so therefore they ruled in Miranda’s favor in The Miranda v. Arizona case. In closing the ruling on the case showed that the US shows equality to all people of any color because the police violated the laws of the amendment so the supreme court voted to release Miranda. The Miranda v. Arizona case showed that the Judicial branch promotes the system of democracy because Miranda admitted to being guilty but the authorities didn’t follow the rights given to U.S. citizens so they released him.

    Read More

  • Danny Escobedo Pros And Cons

    1392 Words  | 6 Pages

    Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 4 Ohio Misc. 197, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (U.S.Ill. 1964) , because this case set the precedent for future cases to guarantee any suspect their constitutional rights upon arrest.

    Read More

  • Brief Analysis Of The Miranda Vs. Arizona Court Case

    928 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Miranda vs. Arizona court case ruled that detained criminal suspects , prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self incrimination, the case was one

    Read More

  • Fifth Amendment Motivation

    367 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the most successful acts in America, created, which is known as the Bill of Rights and is now seen as one of the most fundamentals part in assuring the additional development of culture. The Bill of Rights, according to Amar (1992), despite standing as a centerpiece of our constitutional order, it is usually broken down and examined separately. In the case of the sixth, eight, and fifth amendments all are covered and taught in criminal procedure. Throughout the following essay, we will analyze the psychological motivation when the Bill of Rights. We will focus on the Fifth Amendment and learn a little more on the following founding founders motivations.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Ecobedo Vs. Illinois Case

    1347 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Crime and Criminal Law said that “Miranda can be considered the icing on Escobedo’s cake. Escobedo did the work, Miranda got the credit.” (106). Due to Escobedo and Miranda, suspects are now advised of their rights and speak less than they did back before these two cases (Crime and Criminal Law 106). The effect of Miranda v. Arizona were the Miranda rights which stated, (1)

    Read More

  • Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    890 Words  | 4 Pages

    The problem arose when the police officers said they had not advised Miranda of his right to an attorney. Miranda’s lawyer was concerned that his Sixth Amendment Right had been violated. This case was noticed by the ACLU and was taken to the Supreme Court. This case raised issues within the Supreme Court on the rights of Criminal Defendants.

    Read More

More about Principles Of Miranda Vs Arizona Democracy

Open Document