ipl-logo

Privacy Essay: Nothing To Hide By Solove. Solove

883 Words4 Pages

The essay Why Privacy Matters Even If You Have “Nothing To Hide” written by a professor of law at George Washington University Solove, Daniels. The essay was about how we as individuals should care more about our privacy even if we had “nothing to hide”. Solove uses metaphors from famous novels to give us an idea of what could potentially problems that could arise if this country 's sole priority was security. His argument is our privacy is more important than security in this country, but I agree with some things Solove said in his Passage but not everything. I believe privacy is more important when it comes to security vs privacy debate. (Solove pg 163-167) Before I continue I need to explain each aspect of this argument. First of the two aspects stated in Solove 's essay is privacy and security, and Solove believes we as citizens of the united states as individuals should care more about our privacy even if we had “nothing to hide”. When it comes to our personal information like our SS#, address, credit card#, name, date of birth, and internet activities. Most of our personal info alone is not useful but Solove states “ a problem emerges from the fusion of small bits of seemingly innocuous data. When combined, the information becomes much more telling and lethal” (Solove 11). The other side of the argument is security; Post 9/11 the US government has strived to increase and improve our nation 's security, consequently, the government has become invasive into our

Show More
Related

  • Usa Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    427 Words  | 2 Pages

    Recently the right to privacy has been severely threatened by the Patriot Act. The USA PATRIOT ACT, which was made a law on October 26, 2001 by president George W. Bush, let criminal investigators use whatever tools necessary to find terrorist attacks before they happened; USA PATRIOT ACT is short for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001". This was made a law in response to the attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center in NYC on September 11, 2001. Law enforcement officials were given better resources to fight financial counterfeiting, smuggling and money laundering schemes that funded terrorists. The Patriot Act’s definition of terrorism also gave

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The US Patriot Act

    449 Words  | 2 Pages

    911 dramatically impacted societies broadly and law enforcement pointedly. According to the National Commission on Terrorists upon the United States (2004), it was clear after the September 11 terrorist attacks that intelligence sharing among all levels of law enforcement and the intelligence community was bankrupt (Carter & Carter, 2009). After the fact, there was a considerable investment of resources in many different government sectors for preparedness, response, and recovery from terrorist attacks. Shortly after the attack, President Bush signs the USA Patriot Act on October 2, 2001.

    Read More

  • Government Privacy Susan Maret Summary

    1180 Words  | 5 Pages

    It gives us a broad view of how devious our government can be towards their private situations. One of the main consequences that government faces as a result of their secrets is the distrust they receive from America today. Our government can asks us to participate in their desire to know more of us but refuses to inform us with the truth. Instead of giving up our rights to our government we should be protecting them. Therefore, it is absurd that there is even a debate on whether or not we should allow our government to monitor our personal

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The USA Patriot Act

    1518 Words  | 7 Pages

    While the act played a crucial role in enhancing homeland security through advanced technology and the prevention of future tragedies, it also faced criticism for overreaching government authority and encroaching on individual privacy, without necessarily providing significant gains in security. The political responses to the 9/11 attacks had profound effects on society, aiming to mitigate potential threats and acts of terrorism. These responses led to positive changes, such as containing the powerful Taliban group and reducing their destructive activities. However, they also resulted in the loss of American military lives, infringements on freedom of speech, the displacement of Afghan people, and damage to essential infrastructure. These consequences highlight the need for a more balanced and comprehensive approach to addressing terrorism and its

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay On Edward Snowden

    1418 Words  | 6 Pages

    Edward Snowden perfectly sums up the thought process behind the rejection of the mass surveillance: “Privacy isn’t about something to hide. Privacy is about something to protect… freedom of speech doesn’t mean much if you can’t have a quiet space… arguing that you don’t have privacy because you have nothing to hide is like arguing that you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” (Document 2). The point of view is from an ardent Libertarian that has contributed to Ron Paul’s campaign numerous times. Edward Snowden firmly believes in the right to self.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Patriot Act

    997 Words  | 4 Pages

    Some Americans believe that the Patriot Act is a violation of privacy, but the government takes crucial steps to ensure the privacy of all law-abiding Americans. Despite contrary beliefs, the

    Read More

  • How Has 9/11 Impacted Society

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since September 11th, fear connected with national security threats has shifted to fear of the federal government. The U.S.A. Patriot Act certainly caused much anxiety amongst society. Signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001, this act increased law enforcement’s surveillance and investigative powers, “The purpose of the USA PATRIOT Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and other purposes.” Clearly, federal agents have abused their power, as personal information, telephone calls, and Internet searches were and are being recorded and saved. A recent news article, posted in The Guardian, fully elucidates the intrusive government spying of American citizens, “the watchlist tracks ‘known’ and ‘suspected’ terrorists and includes both foreigners and Americans.

    Read More

  • The Fourth Amendment: Citizen's Privacy

    119 Words  | 1 Pages

    To further support this, information that is collected is used to protect the Nation from "threats.” (2.1)Since this information is used to protect the Nation from “threats,” not to intrude on everyday citizen’s privacy, it is not an invasion of their right to privacy. Correspondingly, part of protecting citizen’s privacy is requiring a probable cause for

    Read More

  • Why Privacy Matters Even If You Have Nothing To Hide Analysis

    1651 Words  | 7 Pages

    Nowadays, “privacy” is becoming a popular conversation topic. Many people believe that if they do not do anything wrong in the face of technology and security, then they have nothing to hide. Professor Daniel J. Solove of George Washington University Law School, an internationally known expert in privacy law, wrote the article Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’, published in The Chronicle of Higher Education in May of 2011. Solove explains what privacy is and the value of privacy, and he insists that the ‘nothing to hide’ argument is wrong in this article. In the article, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’”, Daniel J. Solove uses ethos, pathos, and logos effectively by using strong sources, using

    Read More

  • Essay On NSA

    1359 Words  | 6 Pages

    “Threats to freedom of speech, writing and action, though often trivial in isolation, are cumulative in their effect and, unless checked, lead to a general disrespect for the rights of the citizen.” This quote is from George Orwell’s book, 1984, written in 1944 about domestic surveillance. This quote has become all too real in today’s technology-idolizing society in which our freedom of speech and the security of our digital thoughts and papers are constantly put at risk by the government, particularly the National Security Administration. The NSA conducts wiretaps and digital surveillance without the acknowledgement of the majority of citizens and without constitutional evidence to do so. Although the NSA must appear before Foreign Intelligence

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The Patriot Act

    667 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the text “Our value is founded on a unique and deep understanding of risks, vulnerabilities, mitigations, and threats. Domestic Surveillance plays a vital role in our national security by using advanced data mining systems to "connect the dots" to identify suspicious patterns” (NSA). One of the slogans of the NSA is, “if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear. However, if you have nothing to hide there is no argumentation as to why the NSA taps into any form of communication or access to the internet. Therefore, this withdraws the power of the people and puts it directly back into the government and, simultaneously belittles citizen’s

    Read More

  • Privacy Violations In The Book 1984 By George Orwell

    839 Words  | 4 Pages

    There’s a question americans usually ask themselves, is the government trustable? Many citizens would answer no, many americans believe that the government is constantly watching them. The privacy of americans citizens is being violated by the gps trackers in our phones that the government can see and monitor, how the governments listens to our calls and how they store all our information. This is similar to the privacy violations explored in 1984 by showing how in 1984 Big Brother is constantly watching it’s citizens.

    Read More

  • The Homeland Security System

    1085 Words  | 5 Pages

    Even with the emergence of domestic spying and snooping on citizens of the United States, the country is relatively secure. There is a fine line that must be walked in order to meet the needs of providing security for the nation and providing the civil liberties that are afforded to the citizens of the country. This line has become blurred since the attacks of 9/11 with the addition of numerous laws and acts to assist the federal government in meeting the threats posed to the nation. The cost of some of these laws and acts will continue to be looked at for the foreseeable future, as they should be. Once the government starts taking away civil liberties in the name of national security and security for the population, the country’s foundation is all but lost and the oppression begins of the very citizens the system was designed to protect.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Nothing To Hide Argument By Daniel J. Solove

    541 Words  | 3 Pages

    Solove’s great substance in his essay is due to the depth of his key points in his essay. He starts off with explaining the nothing-to-hide argument, which is this idea that if you have nothing to hide from government surveillance, you have nothing to fear (Solove 735). He then goes on to link this explanation of the nothing-to-hide-argument with his understanding of privacy. Solove’s understanding of privacy is that it does not have one singular essence that one can locate, but is made up of a plethora of different things that resemble

    Read More

  • Priscilla M. Regan's Legislating Privacy

    267 Words  | 2 Pages

    A book by Priscilla M. Regan: “Legislating Privacy”, explains how deep the concept of privacy can create beyond the vacancy of public pressure between individuals and society. “When viewed as a fundamental right, privacy can be interpreted as being involved in a range of constitutional and moral issues — freedom from surveillance and searches, reproductive freedom, freedom to associate, confidentiality of communications, and family values.” (Regan 48). According to Reagan's statement, privacy is a sensitive topic when approached from many different angles. The constitution and moral issues as Reagan discuss is directly cohesive to the case of the Minnesota school district.

    Read More

More about Privacy Essay: Nothing To Hide By Solove. Solove

Open Document