Needing a warrant may unable police to some investigations as well. The Fourth Amendment was created for safety and privacy reasons, but has deterred the efficacy of law-enforcement; needing a search warrant makes gathering evidence harder, police investigations have been delayed, and the Exclusionary Rule causes some investigations to be inadmissible. Needing a search warrant made collecting evidence much harder for the government and police. On spot searches are not allowed, or any type of search for that matter, unless there is probable cause.
A few of those are privacy concerns, cost of testing, issues arising under individual state laws, etc. Many areas have random drug testing policies in place. Randomly testing employees uninvolved under suspicion of drug use is unconstitutional because the Fourth Amendment states that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause... People who test negative for an illegal substances do not prove random drug testing is a successful deterrent, it can only prove that they have not consumed illegal drugs recently. If someone is hiring for a new employee that has a drug conviction on their record, it would be reasonable perhaps, but privacy is a right. Aside from the protections offered by our Constitution, it 's a costs a lot of money.
As well as, a person can’t be a double jeopardy which means if someone commits a crime and the police didn’t find any evidence against them so they can free to go. It indicates that if the court didn’t have any evidence against a criminal and the court let him go and later, police find evidence against criminals so they can’t arrest that person again. It shows to us that the seventh amendment is very important and helpful. The 8th Amendment is important to all people that live in the United States. First, the 8th Amendment helps the courts to take a decision.
"Terrorism has been a big problem in the modern day. There are not many things people can do to stop it but the federal government can try to prevent by watching emails and social media where itâ€™s needed, the same is true with States and schools. This will not only help prevent terrorism but help schools stop bullying and stop pedophiles from lurking behind a phone or computer screen. There have been cases where an American would get caught talking to a terrorists, as well as kids bullying each other or kids talking to a grown man or woman. These are only a few reasons social media should be monitored by federal, state, and local authority.
If a local street gang would steal our purchase, that is illegal, and we can expect that the police will try to recover our property and return it to us. If some level of the government tried to take our house away from us for whatever reason, they are prohibited--except by “due process of law”. This idea of protecting property rights from being taken without “due process” is an inheritance we received from the Magna Carta. In 1215 the particulars of how the government took people’s possessions was different than today, but the basic principle is the same. If we should decide to stand up for our rights, we would consult the laws written down about our situation.
There seemed to be a lot of controversy when adopting the cameras in Hong Kong affecting the people and what they felt like invasion in their privacy. According to Simon Young, director of the Center for Comparative and Public Law at Hong Kong University mentions that the Hong Kong law prohibits police officers from recording citizens if it breaches the public’s expectation of privacy, generally interpreted as any private space (Trinna Leong, 2012). Hong Kong officer’s do not have an issue about the body cameras or wearing it, but caution needs to be exercised in the usage of it when risking the invasion of the citizens privacy. But, there has also been police brutality; seven police officers from Hong Kong had beaten a protestant by the name of Ken Tsang he was knocked to the
Despite this level of awareness, police officers who receive calls that report a cybercrime are rarely qualified to investigate and understand technology to the extent that justice is achieved for the individual. State police officers frequently try to throw cybercrimes at the hands of federal police because they not wanting to be the first responders . The community expects police officers to do their job perfectly or at least try to do so because when they fail to investigate an electronic crime, the rights of many of the victims will surely be lost because the police have not done their duty to protect the rights of individuals. The solution to this problem is that the state should start the training and development of officers' skills, or at least some of them so that they can protect citizens from losing their rights
I agree with the government has access to check and collecting phone records because for me, American security is the most important situation facing the society privacy. Some of the reason why I say it is that everybody knows that government was taking access to our information long time ago. It is not a new, also I think that the principally, government doesn’t care about our lives. They just want to prevent our security of possible attacks terrorist and people, who want to cause crime; it doesn’t matter if the government just wants to save its security. Everybody should know that all government problems affect our relatively.
operated only outside the United States; in that case, he had not been paying very close attention to the provision of the “Patriot Act.” Furthermore, he had decided that he did not “want to live in society” that intercepted private communications. Since any government servant or contractor is repeatedly warned that the unauthorized disclosure of classified information is a crime. “Snowden positively knew this, because he leaked the very court order that approved the continuation of the project.” Consequently, he was not blowing the whistle on anything illegal; he was exposing something that failed to meet his standards of
Americans today find something wrong people will know, with the technology in today’s society government officials and CEO’s of many corporations can’t hide much from the world. Ranging from emails, phone calls, and video calls, people what will know what that certain person is doing expect of Hillary Clinton her emails magically disappeared from the world. Donald Trump does some suspicious activity, but I honestly think he will not transform the government to change it to a kleptocracy, technology today and Americans will keep it under control. Other than that Donald Trump and his administration will maybe do some good for the United States and its people. People’s voices have great power over the