Early one morning of December, 2012 Glenn Greenwald, a reported who often writes about national-security issues, received an email from an anonymous email server. Anonymous email servers are used to hide a person’s identity. The source was asking for Greenwald’s public encryption, or PGP, key. Greenwald did not have one and certainly did not know how to install or use it. Greenwald disregarded the email. The source later sent step-by-step introductions on how to install and use a PGP. Again, Greenwald disregarded the email. The source attempted to get Greenwald’s attention for about a month, then moved on. On January 11, 2013, source sent an encrypted email to Micah Lee, a technologist for the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the chief technology …show more content…
Just like every other person, I enjoy my privacy. I would not want my actions to be monitored whenever I used my computer of cellphone. As I stated earlier, the constitution does not allow searches or seizures to be performed without a warrant or probable cause. It is very possible that creating the program would interfere with what the constitution says. Living in America is all about being free. Increasing surveillance would take away part of my freedom as well as others’. The constitution was created to keep America free and protect the rights of American citizens. Without the program, America would not be free. American people would have to live in constant fear of what attack will happen next. Also without the program, a non-living person does not have many rights to be protected. The constitution was created in the interest of American citizens, so it would not benefit a country if it prohibits the creation of software that would be used to protect people. The world is always changing and technology is becoming more effective, therefore methods of protection cannot be taken as if terrorists are carving their messages into stone pillars. Terrorists are far more mainstream than that. They are communicating through texts, emails, phone calls, and more. Therefore my program would need to be able to identify when they communicated. Not creating the program would cause a …show more content…
When Prism became known to the people of America, it was a widely discussed controversial topic. Then people later moved onto discussing Ylvis' smash hit "What Does the Fox Say?". It was almost as if everyone forgot about Prism. The use of Prism, or another program, will become what is normal. People will realize that the program does not interfere with their personal lives and will carry on living. Only a few people in the NSA knew what Prism was. Most people in the actually NSA did not know what it was and had never heard of it. Since no one knew about it, no one who was innocent of terrorist relations was affected by it. I would do just the same with my program. I would keep it secret so that there was not a rebellion against it and American people would never know of it. Since Snowden leaked the information on Prism, terrorists now know that they are being watched when they make calls. They will find sneakier ways to hurt the U.S. So, NSA will have to find ways that are cleverer to prevent terrorist attacks. Creating the program could possibly be the solution. Maybe it is already being used as a solution. Who knows? I don’t and if they are, it certainly isn’t harming me. Government secrets are important since they are in the interest of the people and should not be leaked because they can cause a lot of controversy and cause their actions to be less effective.
The U.S follows a different school of surveillance. Despite the fundamental right to be held “innocent until proven guilty”, it monitors everyone until proven innocent. The status quo could of course damage America’s long known liberties granted by the Constitution. Recent revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden, have confirmed that the government is more likely to cross some constitutional lines in the name of national security. “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) regulates the government’s acquisition of any electronic surveillance within the country for foreign intelligence use.
The National Security Agency also known as the NSA, it's an intelligent organization of the United States government who monitors foreign countries and collects information of people. The NSA is economically beneficial towards the government of the United States some reasons consist of the prevention of dangerous terrorist attacks, funding's in the government, and the prevention of hackers taking over the system. Though at the same time the NSA should be stopped because they have invaded the privacy of many people without their consents. Currently, the United States has been facing terrorist attack, which has caused many deaths and tragedies not only to the United States but as well towards the world.
The Department of Justice drafted the USA PATRIOT Act to increase the federal agencies’ power to use surveillance cameras, conduct search and detect communication both nationwide and from foreign countries to seek out terroristic attacks. In addition, the president that signed this into law was President George W. Bush. In addition, most people would not want the government to secretly spy on them.
There are many constitutional implications of government spying programs, one of those being a complete violation of privacy here in the United States. Snowden himself exposed the NSA, as he noted that calls were recorded and various other electronic data were collected on many individuals and kept for future use. There is no denying that the use of spying programs violates an American’s 4th amendment and it often leads to people refraining from posting something controversial due to the fear of being watched. Ever since the WikiLeaks documents were publicized, many people feel paranoid, and rightly so. People used to be able to talk, post and do anything they wanted to with complete freedom.
In conclusion, NSA’s digital surveillance shouldn’t be continued for following reasons. First, it’s against of laws and constitution. Retrieving information from digital space is considered as unreasonable searches, therefore it violates the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, which protects all U.S citizens from unreasonable searches. It’s not legal either.
Should the US government have the right to track every single phone call we ever make? Does that sound like a good enough reason to try and prevent terrorist attacks on our country? Congress passed a law called the USA Patriot Act in 2001, 45 days after 9/11. This act is a series of laws were passed in an attempt to prevent terrorist attacks in the future. There are different ideas on whether the USA Patriot Act is a constitutional act or if it is a complete violation of the US Constitution.
The NSA in attempting to regain the trust of those companies. “Many Americans have complexly trust in the government is making the difficult task of public-private cooperation against cyber-threats even more difficult.” (Nakashima, 2013)The director of NSA, Gen. Keith B. Alexander is working tersely to restore confidence in his agency, the agency has taken quite a bit of beating in wake of the leaks and the if it’s even possible to trust a government agency that openly admits it steals our personal information. “But at public speaking warns that cyberattacks on such critical and technology-dependent industries as energy, finance and transportation can be prevented only if those industries work with the government. Alexander also stresses to congress that a “cyber-legislation” to encourage private companies to share data on cyber threats.
Looking back on the results of these types of programs, many wonder if the government has truly had success with these programs The intelligence programs centered around the NSA have grown at such a drastic rate that issues have risen around the legal circumstances of spying, the effectiveness of the program, and the reach of spying inside the country and the rest of the world. One of the biggest arguments is whether all of this is truly legal. The NSA and Barack Obama have both openly admitted to the collection of nationwide phone call and email data that is analyzed for our safety. Although this is done with the best intentions, critics will say that this is too far, as well as unconstitutional. These acts carried out by the government are “violations of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which states that ‘the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches
INTRODUCTION. “The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the force of the Crown. It may be frail its roof may shake the wind may blow through it the storm may enter, the rain may enter but the King of England cannot enter all his force dare not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement.” These words from the Semayne’s case , decided in 1603, capture the nascent views on privacy if discussed about in a legal sense. Philosophically, privacy can be traced back to the times of Aristotle, ancient India and is epidemically present in numerous religious texts and social customs.
I must say, that this brought reason for concern; because the Patriot Act bars such behavior. To add injury the government had no justification why their new surveillance method was not covered by the U.S. Patriot Act. However, I understand that the country is at high terrorist risk, but it is unjustifiably and unnecessary for the American government to infringe on our
In an age of what appears to be increasing insecurity, Americans have to make a choice between being secure and maintaining civil liberties or is it up to the government to decide. Privacy today faces growing threats from a growing surveillance apparatus that is often justified in the name of the national security. Security is privileged over values such as civil liberties after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Because of this horrendous event the national government, began its surveillance attack in hoping to stop another terrorist attack from happening. The government has been trying to rebuild the security that was lost (“Money”).
You shouldn’t have to be watched if you aren’t deemed a threat to yourself or society. In my opinion humans are naturally more private creatures that don’t like sharing everything about themselves. The individual right of privacy allows humans to hide somethings about themselves, if it doesn’t seem harmful. However, surveillance is used in public order to observe those that could be plotting against the government, or an attack in the United States. Surveillance has been used to catch and stop many dangerous people who show a threat to the safety of the United States.
The security is overriding to improve the nation, now day security is increasing to control the terrorism. NSA Surveillance one of the agencies that provide intelligent records to the American government. Although leaking out personal information making the American uncomfortable and people started getting freak out. “I am not trying to bring down the NSA, I am working to improve the NSA. I am still working for the NSA right now.
The controversy over the government for tapping into citizen’s phone and email communications is a serious topic that has been going on for a long time. This topic became more controversial when Edward Snowden leaked critical documentation to public about government surveillance programs that were created after 9/11. Many Americans have a different perspective between this particular concerns that is still being talked about. For instance, some citizens are outraged by this controversy and some citizens were not concerned at all about this. In my perspective, I think it was wrong for the government to be able to tap into our phones or filter out packets that contain our personal information.
but they can not get into the lives of others like them can be for safety but should implement another types of methods. at some point I thought that what Snowden said was a lie that just saying it to look good to the world , but then I was reading and I realized it was all true Mr. Edward Snowden is a very good person who knows the damage the government the American states can lead to people if something should occur. due to the large number of people that the North American government disrespectfully without your permission obtained a metadata (a set of data That Gives INFORMATION ABOUT describe and other data) extensive and long. the Citizenfour movie is an excellent movie that helped us to clarify many doubts we had about WikiLeaks , without that film had not understood very bein the situation that is happening the creator made us a great favor when creating this film.