4.1 Evidence Gap for Quality of Private vs. Public Hospitals
China’s 2009 health reform has made impressive progress in expanding insurance and public health coverage, but it has not yet fundamentally changed its public-hospital-dominated health delivery system despite widely-reported problems in quality and efficiency. Since 2011, the government has prioritized county hospital reform in an effort to seek breakthroughs in its hospital sector reforms. Concurrently, the new wave of reform encouraged private investment in hospitals partly in order to promote public hospital reform by creating competition from the private sector. Consequently, the government has gradually relaxed restrictions on private hospitals in terms of health regional
…show more content…
All of those methods have a major flaw in that the measurement depends on indirect information that may not accurately and adequately represent the actual practice. This study instead will use unannounced standardized patients (USP) to measure the technical quality of actual practice.
The Standardized Patient (SP) is a healthy person trained to “consistently” simulate the medical history, physical symptoms, and emotional characteristics of a real patient. The SP, particularly the unannounced visit of SP (USP), has several reported advantages in assessing QoC as opposed to the traditional methods: 1) reliability in measurement and cross-provide comparison because the “same patient” is presented to all providers ; 2) elimination of the “Hawthorne effect” due to the nature of disguised and unannounced visit by SP ; 3) reduced recall bias particularly when the encounters are voice recorded; and 4).SPs can give quality information that the traditional sources can’t provide such as the quality of case history, the physical examination and counseling activities. However, despite those advantages the application of SP in China has concentrated
…show more content…
Figure 1 illustrates one theoretical model that explains the possible pathway of how the ownership type may influence QoC: 1). As China’s public hospitals are not fully financed by the government, hospitals regardless of ownership types may have strong incentives for profits; 2). the institutional incentive for profits may translate to individual motivations for profits; 3). The institutions and the individual clinicians have three major tools for profit: generating tests, medications, and procedures; 4). In a prevailing fee-for-service outpatient setting, in order to generate more revenue, the institution and the individual clinicians may sacrifice quality for more quantity (for example generating unnecessary tests) or improve efficiency to maintain quality and profits; 5). The ownership type may affect this pathway in that the private ownership because of its share-holder mandate for profits may have a stronger incentive for profits than the public hospital which at least in theory has a social mandate – the stronger incentive for profits may lead to inferior quality if the efficiency does not change; however, the private nature may also make the private hospitals more efficient than the public ones; the higher efficiency may enable the private hospitals to generate larger revenue while maintaining quality.
They also use their quality metrics as a guide for hospitals to measure information. The measures include mortality, safety of care, readmission, patient experience, and timely & effective care. These measures are then calculated based on a five star rating with at least three measures reported in at least three of the groups with one of the groups being mortality or safety. Eight measurements for the patient- and caregiver-centered experience To ensure that healthcare organizations continuously strive towards giving the best possible care and improving the quality of care for their patients there are eight measurements for the patient- and caregiver-centered experience.
[Cost] Cost could potentially be the biggest factor of the iron triangle and perhaps the side of the model that leaves administrators most puzzled. With new technology being released quarterly, drug prices soaring, a new aging population that can't be supported by the current workforce, Medicare cutting reimbursement payments and leaning towards insolvency, and the price per service continues to rise it seems as if cutting costs down may seem impossible. Not only have hospitals and clinics began looking for more cost-efficient ways to provide care or, unfortunately which programs to cut, the political arena has been evaluating this as well. Since Obamacare has not lived up to its true potential and glory an alternative method must be identified before the nation's model of healthcare implodes from high costs.
With Reference to the CYP IAPT Core Principles, critically discuss Evidence Based Practice and Routine Outcome Monitoring and the challenges of implementing these within the modality of parenting and within the wider context of practise within the children centres Introduction Studies published by Green, Meltzer, McGinnity, Goodman and Ford in 2004 estimated that 9.6% or nearly 850,000 children and young people aged between 5 -16 had a mental health disorder and it was estimated that a staggering 76% of those CYP with anxiety and depression disorders were not accessing mental health services compared to 35% of adults. As a result of such studies, The children and young people’s improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme (CYP IAPT) was conceived and aimed to transform the delivery of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CHAMS) across England. CYP IAPT has four core principles, Evidence Based Practice (EBP), Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM), Participation, and Reflective Practice. This essay will focus on the two principles of EBP and ROM and will consider the challenges of implementing these within the modality of parenting and within the wider context of practise within the children centres.
The PFCC self-assessment tool was utilized to evaluation and outpatient clinic and the White City VA. Many elements within the tool are not applicable to this setting and are outside the procedural practice. The gaps discussed will be the areas in which PFCC may improve patient care outcomes. Leadership and Management scored high in all areas except one. Patients and families do not participate in policy, procedure, program guidelines, or Governing board activities.
The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) and The Joint Commission grew out of a movement, which recognized the need to identify and measure quality health care in the United States. The origins of HEDIS and the Joint Commission may be traced to the establishment of “a minimum standards for hospital care” adopted by the American College of Surgeons as a part of the Hospitalization Standardization Program. The ACS directly linked quality medical care with a quality patient record. The concept of quality measurement came to light when statistician Walter A. Shewhart identifies good processes equal a good product.
Patients have the option for treatment as private patients in public hospitals, so that they can choose the physician caring for them and their private insurance
China’s healthcare has been through a roller coaster of reform, impacting the health of every citizen throughout history. The country has endured many impactful changes with the large shifts in power, eventually leading to its current healthcare system today. The Cultural Revolution of China was a starting point, with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) taking power in 1949. The CCP implemented a health system reflecting the Marxist communist ideology. Health care was universal.
Hospital compare helps citizens find information for hospitals all over the country. This information helps the patients and their families make the best choice for their monetary restrictions and their health choices. This helps them find out whether the quality of care is adequate for their needs between many hospitals in the patient's home area. Hospital compare helps the patient by making the decision process easier, and making hospitals improve their health care quality. Patients can find a variety of information about the hospitals quality; including general ratings of the hospital, general information, payment and value of care, timely and effective care, and much more information on this website.
The evidences are available by looking at any Canadian television news, newspaper or news-oriented radio channels. “The major argument is about two modules of health care system which are having the fully public health care system or having some private sector as well as public sector.” (Wickens, 2000, 26). Many factors support the idea of having
A patient is going to have a different idea of how a health care should be managed. This in contrast to the way a physician may think the administration should be managed. Furthermore, each different stakeholder involved would have their own ideal reasons to why the health care administration
The Importance of the Six Aims of Quality Patient Care (STEEEP) Since the addition of Crossing the Quality Chasm six aims of quality patient care was created by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), there has been a significant change in the effectiveness and condition of patient care. Before this report came out in 2001, health care providers did not realize that they were not providing proper care to patients in addition to disorganization and complexity of standards of care. The IOM was able to determine that, “failure of system processes, poor communication, and unhealthy work environments contribute to medical errors, ineffective delivery of care, and stress among health professionals” (Winterbottom 2012). It is essential for patients to feel
Given that this is not a trauma center, I’ve also been able to have considerable interaction with what I regard as an “average patient”. Rather than someone being rushed in with a gunshot wound, I’ve seen the devastating effects of poor primary care and chronic illness
One of the dominant factors that could motivate intervention in healthcare by the government is equity factor. This factor is being boosted through the implementation of user fee system. The user fee system tends to promote equity through price discrimination, that is, charge the poor less than the rich for a given health service or product. Obviously, price discrimination contributes to the market failure had been seen as an economic rationale to encourage
In palpable markets, information is often not only difficult to come by but also restricted by those who hold power – and locating this “equilibrium” price is an arduous if not impossible task. The market for medical services may best exemplify this. In the medical market, prices vary depending on one’s HMO, whether they have insurance or not, and the facility performing the service – among other factors. Even if one could find the theorized “equilibrium” price for a medical service by painstakingly extracting all pricing information. One must ask if the same service is being provided at that given price?
India has multiple players in the healthcare segment but there is a huge gap in the demand and number players in the market. Also, considering the growth potential projected in the next few years, it is a highly attractive industry for the existing players. Considering government hospitals as incumbents: This does not impact the industry attractiveness for private players by much because of following reasons in urban areas. Accessibility in terms of commuting and waiting time is much more in govt.