Persuasive Argument
National Athletes are/are not Paid Too Much
The topic, pro athletes are/are not getting paid too much, is a heated argument between people. Have you ever thought about it? Well, an answer that I’m sure would be agreed with is that national athletes are paid way too much money. Some people might say that they deserve what they get, but there really isn’t any supportive reasons for that. People know that doctors and firefighters save lives, while athletes play a game to make money. Even teachers pay isn’t anywhere near to athletes; they educate the generation’s youth so they can make a difference in the future. So many jobs that are very important don’t get paid as much and that money can go towards better causes. But these are only some of the reasons that pro athletes get paid too much. The person that runs are country doesn’t make as much, people who save lives don’t make as much, teachers don’t make as
…show more content…
can all agree with me that they get underpaid compared to athletes. The money that can go towards better causes such as donating to the homeless, donating to charities, helping people, etc goes to people playing a game. Do you think that watching a game is more important than helping people that are in poverty? I didn’t think so. Also, athletes didn’t get paid this much before now, In fact, “Athletes were not always paid more than CEOs. In the early stages of the American Football system, most players had to have a normal day job on top of playing, because there was no money to be made in pro football.” (Two Sides To Every Coin, are Professional Athletes Paid Too Much? BleacherReport.com) Do you know those animal commercials that shows all those pets stranded, hurt, hungry, thirsty that need a home? Well if national athletes weren’t paid so much, money could go toward them instead of relaxing on a couch with food and popcorn while animals and people suffer and in some circumstances,
Click here to unlock this and over one million essays
Show MoreBut, on the other hand, people believe that college athletes have the right to be paid. They should get paid in some form, to help them financially, to pay their bills whether it be
“Never confuse the size of your paycheck with the size of your talent” a quote said by Marlon Brando. A paycheck does not determine the raw talent, discipline level, dedication, character, integrity, or personality of any one person. Although many may agree that college athletes should not receive compensation, I argue that college athletes should get paid because of the amount of money these athletes generate, the time they dedicate to their sport and education, and a heap of different reasons. Being a college athlete or an athlete of any sort at any level is no easy task.
College players should be paid for their efforts on and off the field, because some of these athletes end up not having enough money to continue going to college. To begin the first claim towards why college players should be paid is financial problems. Money Can be a problem in general for just the average college student, add in that “student athletes spend up to 60 hours a week practicing”(Meshefejian), this can become a real issue. With this much time being taken up a week college players do not have enough time to have a job, and “have to leave school early because they don’t have enough money to continue” (Meshefejian).
Student athletes should not get paid because the full-ride scholarships that usually pay for you to go to the university pays for your entire education at the university. Jason Whitlock wrote about college athletes not being paid on Gale Opposing Viewpoints. “We need to stress to them that the educational opportunity they have been afforded is more valuable than the ‘pocket money’ an Ed Martin can provide.” Also, if the player is good enough they could be drafted or go professionally to a pro team in whatever sport that they are decent in. Then again, if we pay these collegiate athletes while receiving scholarship money, “the NCAA admits that a ‘full scholarship’ does not cover the basic necessities for a student-athlete.
Due to the fact that college athletes will not be focused on school, therefore, causing them to not be well educated as well as not having academic skills, college athletes should not be paid. College students will gradually concentrate more on athletics leading them to be discouraged from academics. Their futures will be impacted in a major way if they concentrate more on athletics than academics. For instance, most college athletes “will never go professional and will seek gainful employment beyond their brief athletic career at college” (Bob 23).
Why college athletes should be paid. College athletes should be getting paid because they are putting in so much time on their sport they spend an average of 43.3 hours per week dedicated to their sport. College athletes spend around 43.3 hours on just their sport, if they are spending that much time on sports how are they going to get money. A college student has to go to class and has to have some income of money if college athletes don't have time for a job it's going to be hard to get money for food and college. College athletes need to get paid so they can pay for college.
College athletes are being paid scholarships but do scholarships pay for rent, loans, or food etc. Paying college athletes detracts the purity of the game. Most football players are not in it for the money but for the love of the sport and the chance to say that they had the chance to play college football at that university. College football is a privilege to play it is also a lot of people's jobs that are on the line that they work at year around threw breaks assignments and
A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way.
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
For example, if it wasn’t for basketball players, Gonzaga University would need to spend a lot more money on building a name recognition to students not located on the West. Everyone has their own opinion, but mine is that college athletes should be paid. The amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school are only three of a myriad of reasons why they should be paid. These athletes are not only students, but employees to their universities. They are a core member of many university’s marketing team.
The money that can go towards better causes such as donating to the homeless, donating to charities, helping people, etc goes to people playing a game. Do you think that watching a game is more important than helping people that are in poverty? I didn’t think so. Also, athletes didn’t get paid this much before now, In fact, “Athletes were not always paid more than CEOs.
Athletes shouldn’t be getting paid so much money just for people watching them play a game. Although athletes get paid a lot of money they retire early. However, they should have a plan for after their career. They know that they will retire early so they should be responsible and have a plan.
It seems morally wrong that athletes would be paid more than people who are firefighters, doctors, and police doing more valuable things than playing a game. In the same breath how much is a touchdown a three pointer or a home run
I don’t know why athletes get paid millions of dollars if they are only entertaining us for a living. Tom Brady made $36 million in one year and Lebron James made $71 million last year. The professional players work, practice extremely hard, but are they worth that much. According, some people think that these athletes are not overpaid. Some Americans will work a full-time job until they are protracted at 70 years old, and they don’t make as much money as Tom Brady makes in a year.
Athletes are paid more than very important jobs such as surgeons, teachers, and even the president! Athletes don’t even do very important things, they merely entertain fans in an arena. Do they save lives, educate our future, or run our country? No, they don’t. Finally, an athlete's salary is more than an average American household makes in a whole decade.