ipl-logo

Process Essay: The Ratification Of The Constitution

430 Words2 Pages

The Ratification of the Constitution
The United States Constitution has been operative since 1789. Today, many question the relevancy of a document 222 years old to our society. The Founders created a government farmworker, guaranteed rights of people, and separated the powers. There was great controversy of whether the Constitution should be ratified. The “Federalists”, supporters of the Constitution, were up against a loosely organized group know as “Antifederalist.” “Antifederalists” believe that there is no one to protect the rights of the people. Federalists, believe that the Constitution provides a perfect way to govern life in America. The constitution is a great document, and should ratified. The fundamental basic for government and law, is the concept of the social contract. According to this, human beings live as individuals in a society, they must establish a contract whereby they agree …show more content…

Checks and balances ensure that limits are put on the government, and that rights will not be violated. The more of the people repersentented in government allows for more interest a more power given to people. Through separation of powers, three branches were created. The legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. The legislative branch makes the laws and provides for local interest. The executive branch enforces the laws, and provides for national interest. The last branch, the judicial branch interprets the laws and provides for the fundamental interest of America and its people. As Benjamin Franklin said, “For when you assemble a number of men to have the advantage of their joint wisdom, you inevitably assemble with those men, all their prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interests, and their selfish views.” When you bring these branches together, you have all parts of America

Show More
Related

  • Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    647 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the ways that the United States guarded against cruel and oppressive government or rule was that they made the three branches of government. These three branches were the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch. This helped guard against cruel and oppressive government or rule because “they were separate and distinct powers.” (Doc B) This would help to guard against cruel and oppressive government or rule because all of these powers were separated so there wasn’t one overpowering government.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And Anti-Federalists

    172 Words  | 1 Pages

    The federalist was all for changing the Articles of Confederation and creating a strong government while the Anti-federalist were against changing the system they wanted to fix the main problem. The anti-federalist believed that the states should continue to have power over the government. Both the federalist and the anti-federalist

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    500 Words  | 2 Pages

    In document C, there is a very useful chart that shows one way that each of the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) holds a little bit of power over the others. This is good because it means that no one part of government is above or below the others in terms of power, and there is always a way for one of them to be “checked” if they are becoming too tyrannical. For example, the President (executive) can veto Congressional legislation, but Congress (legislative) can impeach the President if necessary. Being able to “check” each other is one of the ways that the Constitution kept one group from having too much power. Another benefit of having the checks and balances system is that none of the three branches is so far apart from each that they have no power over the others, but they are far enough apart to prevent the power from accumulating.

    Read More

  • Causes Of The 3/5 Compromise

    570 Words  | 3 Pages

    The US Constitution was seen differently between two political parties. These two political parties were the Federalist and Anti-federalist. How much power the government had wasn't the same for these two groups. A Federalist was a group of people who supported the Constitution and the Anti-federalist was a group of people who opposed the ratification of the

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

    1511 Words  | 7 Pages

    Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

    Read More

  • Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    The executive branch enforces laws, the legislative branch passes the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. The purpose of the separation was to guarantee that no branch has more power to dominate over the

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    861 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ratification DBQ The Constitution is a document that still stands as America’s governing body, proving its strength and ability to stand the test of time. Although some aspects of the document are debated and the argument of what is and what is not constitutional is discussed often, it has proven to be right for America and its people. However, in the late 1700s, not everyone saw the Constitution as strong and supported its state-power-heavy predecessor, The Articles of Confederation.

    Read More

  • Essay On How Does The Supreme Court Control Its Docket

    2005 Words  | 9 Pages

    The idea of separation of powers is to have the government powers divided between numerous branches in order for abuse of power to be both less damaging, and less frequent. Checks and balances are a way to even further prevent abuse in our Government system. In this system of checks and balances each branch, those being the legislative, judicial, and executive branch, they each check and balance one another 's powers. Our government is designed this way so that one branch does not have too much power in their hands.

    Read More

  • Essay On Ratifying The Constitution

    457 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ratifying the Constitution Ratifying the Constitution has saved our country from being like England and from not falling apart. Before the constitution we had the articles and those weren’t working out at the time and we weren’t able to fight against rebellions and or against other countries when. We could act faster with the Constitution and we had a checks and balance system and also we had a checks and balances system. We could have acted faster with the constitution instead of wanting around for all states to agree on doing something.

    Read More

  • Separation Of Powers And Checks And Balances In The United States

    456 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States Constitution provides for separation of powers and checks and balances by dividing the central government into three different branches, Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary. The purpose of separation of powers and checks and balances is to prevent one branch from becoming more powerful than the others. The Legislative branch is established in the 1st Article of the Constitution. The Executive branch is established in the 2nd Article of the Constitution; while the Judiciary is established in the 3rd Article of the Constitution. As the founders were creating the Constitution, they feared a central government too weak but also one that was too strong.

    Read More

  • Checks And Balances: The Differences Between The Executive Branch And Congress

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the United States gained their independence, the founders wanted the government to work successfully. As a result, the creators decided to separate the powers of Congress, the Executive, and the Courts and make them equally share power. The framers knew that although dividing the powers of these three branches would not be ideally, they decided to formalize the checks and balances. They originated a system of checks and balances to limit each branch of government from performing the functions and obligations of the other arms of government. In other words, the checks and balances help maintain each branch with limited power, it does not allow one branch to be more superior than the other.

    Read More

  • Executive And Judicial Branch Analysis

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    Our United States government is composed of three branches: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. These branches uphold checks and balances, as in each branch can check each other to keep the balance in power. For example, the Executive Branch can veto bills from the Legislative branch, and the Judicial branch can declare congress made laws unconstitutional. , The Legislative Branch can also check the Executive and Judicial Branches in many ways. These combined with other allowed checks keep the government balanced out and predominantly fair.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

    Read More

  • Checks And Balances On The Salem Witches Trial

    1207 Words  | 5 Pages

    Braulio Escalera Professor Leon History 100 October 14, 2017 Midterm • Section 1: 50% of total grade 1. Identify and describe the importance of five (5) of the following terms: Salem Witches Trial: being a witch indicates that you have super natural or specific devil powers and you can use them against humans by hurting them in return of their soul or loyalty. The story of the Salem Trial witches began in the year 1692 after several young girls were accused for being witches in Salem village, Massachusetts. After the accusations some witches were hanged on June 1692. But the people that were accused of witchcraft were not only women, some of them were men too.

    Read More

  • Us Constitution Relevant Today Essay

    1561 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was formed 223 years ago. Since 1787, a lot has changed. We grew as a country, technology advanced, and we elected 43 different presidents. One of witch, being the first African-American President in history. Due to its age, some may argue that the Constitution is irrelevant to today’s problems.

    Read More

More about Process Essay: The Ratification Of The Constitution

Open Document