Production Logic of Bollywood Films : A critique
Soumik Chatterjee, (Whole – Time Lecturer) Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, Tara Devi Harakh Chand Kankari Jain College. soumikchatterjee86@gmail.com Coordinating Bollywood
What is nevertheless new there in Mumbai or Indian Popular Film Industry to discuss or to discover? Is there any new area left over about Mumbai Film Industry to write on, research on or to get our people informed or aware of this and that? Is there really any new area of discussion left which the other media like popular or critical magazines, serious columns of various books and edited volumes could not locate or discover? No doubt there is about to find a new area absolutely difficult, which has not
…show more content…
Demystification of such a produced 'sign' leads to understand a new political economy of signification beyond all earlier production logics where in the name of 'economic' the financial value does not create any social relationship of the oeuvre but is transmitted into a sign value that basically controls the industry in particular. As exception, some few efforts were made in early eighties to produce some of the satire- critical movies where behind the content the logic rather politics of production was very apt and motivated. Films like Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron, Albert Pinto Ko Gussa Kiuyn Ata Hain, Salim Langre Pe Mat Ro, Garam Hawa etc. have had started a new critical genre which had faded out in the industrial system of producing popular movies and could not sustain more. For rest of popular films the social relationship with the content has been as same as collecting funds for making the film. So collection of content material and collection of investible fund has become a reciprocating but prime aspect of film production …show more content…
(vii) Meanwhile, a parallel underhand release of the film would somehow unbecomingly but inevitably take place in personal 'You Tube' account or all cracking sites and from there it becomes a hand to hand exchange toward a massive 'Symbolic Exchange'.
(viii) A small but responsible understanding from Bollywood end is still left and that too comes as a caution against piracy; another sign that claims social responsibility from the same signifier Bollywood. (ix) Most importantly the Bollywood signifier of late revives a trend of total situational convergence of all cinema producing regions; specially the industrially developed zones. Nowadays series of films are being produced having production staffs from anywhere possible both within and outside the national territory. Moreover the revival of the Bollywood signifier proliferates the convergence with other production regions and so the number of just redubbed films is increasing .
Bollywood a total sign beyond traditional
The concentration is on comparing and finding the changes that history made to this movie genre, especially considering the gender roles. Results will clearly explain the psyche of society in two different periods, which confirms that people reflect the movies as movies have an impact on people. The Introduction It is often said that the element of surprise makes the movie more interesting and leads the plot. There are many masters of storytelling
Through the usage of logos, the film displays the harsh ways
“The screen is a magic medium. It has such power that it can convey emotions and moods that no other art form can hope to tackle.” The written word and the moving image have always had their entwining roots deeply entrenched in similar narrative codes, both functioning at the level of implication, connotation and referentiality. But ever since the advent of cinema, they have been pitted against each other over formal and cultural peculiarities – hence engaging in a relationship deemed “overtly compatible, secretly hostile” (Bluestone 2).
Film is specifically made to be sold. Film is an art that is also a source of income. No matter the format, be it big budget or independent, film is a commercial product. According to Comolli and Narboni in their essay “Cinema/Ideology/Criticism”, film is “transformed into a commodity”. Film is “a product, manufactured within a given system”, is it the product of the ideologies that dominates where it was constructed.
Ray’s disagreement is the misgiving of the American society. They want both of these extremes in their lives, and they do not want to choose”, he lamented. Each hero backs the other up in his own way, which reflects the difficulty in choosing only one hero’s beliefs/personality this example gives an understanding of film history, it helps society change styles such as ‘reality’ which is made up of assent and reputation (Film. Form. And Culture), meaning that people’s social behavior is really anassert strongly even though it is also publicized in pleasure, the most comforting thing is that it makes people agree and accept what they see.
Due to her book "Hollywood: The Dream Factory. An Anthropologist Looks at the Movie Makers" Hortense Powdermaker is regarded as one of the pioneers of ethnography. Published in 1951 by Secker & Warburg in London, Powdermaker here aims to demystify the affect of movies on the audience and establishes the hypothesis "that the social system in which they are made significantly influences their content and meaning" (Powdermaker, 1951, p.3). After living in Hollywood for one year she concludes that the internal structures resemble those of a totalitarian system in which the struggle between business and art is reflected in the meaning of its movies. It suggests that the values of studio bosses and producers dominate while the artistic values of directors and writers are strongly restricted.
•Power of Suppliers Suppliers in the movie producer industry allude to assets necessary to make a movie. This may incorporate innovation suppliers, gear makers, and imaginative ability. The movement from hand drawing to CG/outsourcing multiplies the suppliers required. Nevertheless, bargaining force for these suppliers are controlled in that, in spite of the fact that it is critical and often hard to select the best assets, there are numerous choices accessible for movie producers to
Over the past century, film has served as a powerful means of communication to a global audience and has become a vital part of the contemporary culture in a world that is increasingly saturated by visual content. Due to the immediacy and the all-encompassing nature of film, the process of watching a film, is widely perceived to be a passive activity by the general masses. However, quoting Smith in his article about the study of film, “nothing could be further from the truth.” The study and understanding of film as an art form enhances the way we watch and appreciate films. It requires the audience's active participation and interaction with the film in order to fully comprehend the directors' intention behind every creative decision.
Such ethical dilemmas can be found in people’s everyday lives, and although appears to be a straightforward question, there is much debate over which standard of behavior people should abide to when responding to certain situations, and determining what is morally right or wrong. The medium of film provides us with a fictional world in which
There is no doubt that Hollywood has many influences on society especially on young age. The term “Hollywood” refers to the film industry where located to the west and northwest of downtown Los Angeles, California (“Where is Hollywood,” n.d.). Not only in Los Angeles that television shows and movies of Hollywood are popular but also all around the country and worldwide. The audiences of Hollywood’s products are in various age starting from little kids to elders. Hollywood has incredible ability to spread believes, cultures, morals and even political influence on society.
Through movies’ ability to stay grounded in some truths, yet also push social boundaries, it is clear that films shape culture, and culture shapes film, making more important now than ever that filmmakers are aware of what they are putting out and the implications they will have. Not every movie producer
How do movies and television influence people’s behavior? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. Movies and television in XXI century became one of main way to inform, present people important aspects of humans’ life. In 2015 more than 1,50 billon of people worldwide had access to television, which means this is one of the greatest tool to influence people’s life.
In our society today, every individual’s ideas can be exchanged in various creative forms. The short film medium, being a form of social commentary, is a pertinent driving force behind shifts in personal values. Thus short films as a textual form have great value and impact to society due to their versatile delivery. Steve Cutts’ Happiness (2017) is a satirical film whose fast-paced nature prioritises meaning over matter to critique the constant pursuit of happiness in misplaced interests. Erez Tadmor and Guy Nattiv’s Strangers (2003) depicts a singular scenario and builds tension to convey the overcoming of entrenched racial divides.
The Role of Media in the feminist movement The term media refers to several different types of methods used to communicate and educate society for a socially aware nation (Pradesh, 2014). It is regarded collectively as ‘mass media’, which includes broadcast media (television, cinema and radio), print media (newspapers, magazines, and journals) and Internet based-web sites (“Role of Media in Social Awareness”, 2013; Pradesh, 2014). Through its different marketing segments, media is a fundamental source for information and idea exchanging.
Being a visual medium of presentation, a film creates an instant, direct and more convincing impression on its audience fulfilling its dual purpose of entertaining as well as sensitizing the audience. A lot of movies based on social issues are now being made to create awareness among people about the issues besides entertaining the audience, which is perhaps the foremost purpose behind the making