Evaluation of Project Management Methodologies Project Management Methodologies are a sequence of diverse procedures designed to support project managers and team members. The purpose of using these methodologies in project management is to complete the tasks involved in the project faster and with strategies in place to handle issues when they arise. It leads the team throughout the project and delivers steps to follow and targets to achieve during the project lifetime. Below analysed are some of the popular project management methodologies used by organizations: Agile This method tries to provide rapid, continuous delivery of product to the customers (PM Methodologies, n.d.). Unlike traditional methodologies such as the Waterfall, where the
Projects management in pure product organization In pure product organization the product manager has complete authority to manage all project resources including allocation and merit reviews. This provides better communication and coordination while executing projects. In this type of organizational structure individuals perform only tasks in which they are experts and it is easier to manage the work allocation upfront. Because of the reporting structure an effective communication channel is established and it results in a very rapid reaction
The concept of an integrated approach to communications, as defined by Hallahan, Wilcox, and Scott, is the notion of the use of a team approach to communications by recruiting experts from different disciplines such as advertising, public relations, and marketing to work together on a project from the very start. In this way, all individuals working in an organization work to promote and advance the organization’s mission. However, an integrated approach to communications addresses more than just the organizational communicators’ or managers’ desires but also coordinates activities in order to focus on an audience’s interest and needs (Hallahan, et al, 7). The authors argue that an integrated approach to communications allows different professionals
Advantages and disadvantages of working within teams or groups with reference to relevant business communications theory This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working within teams or groups with reference to relevant business communications theory. We live in an age where effective and efficient communication is critical to ensure a high performing team or group. In most organisations working within teams or groups is extremely common. Blanchard et al. (2007) has suggested that the reason for this approach is that the world of business is rapidly evolving and that the work required of organisations is constantly changing and become more complex.
In fact shared leadership is the basis on all levels in all work in the organisation, starting in the teams (Carson, B., Tesluk, & Marrone, 2007). Each team has offices clustered together. Outside each office cluster there is a board where each project is categorized according to it´s status and everyone can monitor the ongoing process of every task (figure 2.). The team based shared leadership approach is supportive for the employees and can also prevent them to become inactive or passive. It also provides the opportunity to intervene on earlier stages if employees get off track or become
A to-do list is a unique type of a checklist that can be discussed and implemented in all the organizations. The to-do list permits you to rapidly and effectively deal with your different tasks. It 's just a list that keeps the greater part of your tasks and things to finish in time and in more efficient manner. The schedule is not just a great device for officials; anybody will discover this device helpful. The to-do list permits you to plan activities and not let anything miss-out from the schedule.
Managing teams and groups is a crucial engagement in the work environment since they are characterized by dynamics and go through development stages that require emphasis to be placed on proper leadership (Management Pocket Book, 2011). A single organization is comprised of many teams, and the overall success of an organization is determined by the effectiveness of the respective teams (Segal & Smith, n.d.). For the purposes of this paper, I will use my participation in a team created to investigate escalating costs in my division to create an understanding about managing groups and teams in the work environment. My experience, as well as that of other members, will be used to conceptualize the application of group dynamics theories and
But with proper planning, working with applicable or fitted spectrum learning levels and team work among the employees with one goal, the Organizational Development can be effectively implemented through the defined, achievable and measurable goals and objectives of the business. Since change is inevitable and constant, good leadership within the organization should also consider. The proper training needs can be assess, work advancement opportunities, developed skills and knowledge can be given by the management after accurately assessing its employees from top to bottom, as well as its operational system as a whole. Thus, it is analysed that change is not hindrance to work progress and advancement. It is but an opportunity to exceed what is expected
Contemporary management involves many aspects of management. These aspects include planning, leading, organising and controlling operations to achieve certain organisational goals. When comparing different management levels it is evident that at all levels emphasise the importance of using resources effective and responsibly. Managers should be able to build their own as well as their subordinates’ skills, regarding decision making, monitoring information and supervising personnel are which are essential to success. Managers have great responsibilities, these responsibilities include managing a diverse work force, maintaining a competitive edge, behaving ethically and using emerging technologies.
According to Nelson (2013), for effectiveness in project management, particularly in communication, project managers must master interpersonal skills. This means a long and continuous process of personal growth and management development. This demonstrates that interpersonal competence is the result of accurate and realistic perception of interpersonal situations and specific behavioral skills leading to a significant impact on long-lasting and authentic relationship, satisfactory to the people involved. Another component of this competency refers to the relationship itself, and understands the emotional-affective dimension, predominantly. In the view of Narayanan and DeFillippi (2012), handle interpersonal situations requires sensitivity and perceptual and behavioral flexibility, which means trying to see different angles or aspects of the same situation and act differently, not routine, experimenting with new behaviors perceived as action alternatives.