There are various types of electoral systems adopted all around the world, mainly being Proportional Representation (PR), Majoritarian/ First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) and mixed electoral systems. I firmly believe that some countries stand a better chance at promoting the representation of women and ethnic minorities through the usage of certain electoral systems. This essay will firstly seek to explore the differences between PR and FPTP and the effects of such electoral systems. Secondly it will analyse the downfalls and male dominance associated with FPTP. Thirdly it will examine countries that still use the FPTP system and how their politics may seem unfair. Lastly it will compare countries which have shifted from FPTP to PR which in turn has …show more content…
(Ishiyama, J.T. 2012, Electoral Systems). This is as a result of the actual manner in which the electoral systems conduct themselves and further their representation amongst the nation’s people. It can be seen that a Majoritarian Electoral Systems adopts the notion of FPTP. The idea of First-Past-The-Post is essentially the single individual that comes first in the race wins. Majoritarian systems are a single-member plurality system in which the public will vote for an individual rather than a party. This system seeks to target the political centre and the most influential citizens as it is solely the votes for the individual that counts, whereas in a PR system that their target is the whole country and the relative parties campaign on the political and ideological spectrum.( Ishiyama, J.T. 2012, Electoral Systems). The Majoritarian and FPTP electoral system however misappropriate the number of votes to seats in government/parliament which in turn causes alienation in a society which is already divided. In a society which is divided there needs to be fair elections and representation as the purpose of the government should be to break down all divisions in the country. Thus it can be seen that in a system which uses FPTP,
The amendment process as stated in the Constitution is the process that “An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose. The amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the State legislatures, or three-fourths of conventions called in each State for ratification.”. There are many pros and cons of the amendment process and I will discuss a few of them in this essay. In my opinion, there are more cons than pros of the amendment process. A con of the amendment process is that there isn’t much room for change as time goes on Better said as the amendments are outdated.
This system will allow, each voter to not only elect a candidate but to select their preferences. This would end the spoiler dynamic of third party and independent candidates and consistently produce a majority nationwide winner. By eliminating the candidate with the lowest number of votes and picking the candidate with the highest votes will be a new system introduced in modern
The first-pass-the-post system is another comparatively undemocratic feature of the Constitution because it create a two party system in which one party wins everything even if it is just by a slight majority whereas, a proportional system would be more democratic because seats are divided based on the proportion of votes a party gets. Dahl’s last point in the chapter is that the American system is different than other countries in that our president carries out the duties of the prime minister and the ceremonial
Contrasting are those that promote the electoral college, expressing that it unites parties and makes them more moderate, it enforces a two party system, and it gives more voice to minorities. It can be agreed by most that the electoral college has its faults and improvement is possible. The means by which this could be achieved is not through
Throughout this time, our views on the Electoral College have went in all kinds of ways. The big reason for the Electoral College, was so that the whole country had a more equal say on choosing the national president. In each state the electors gather on the Monday following the second Tuesday of December. Each state has electoral votes according to the number of House members and Senators it has in Congress.
One major argument is that “the elimination of the Electoral College would destroy the two-party system” effectively “destroying the cohesiveness of the nation” which is not true (McCollester). Rather, the two-party system has had a negative effect on the country, “ideas outside the mainstream may have a difficult time being heard” as third parties are minimized in favor of two major parties (Hartvigsen). Maintaining the Electoral College to preserve the two-party system is pointless; a greater variety of candidates could improve elections and better represent voters (pattern 1). Others have argued that the Electoral College is a sacrosanct tradition that is endemic to the country and the paradigm of voting systems; however, traditions can change (pattern 1a, list 4, 12, 14). However, many scholars and savants censure and deride the system because of its age, claiming that it “was obsolete within a bare decade of its inauguration” and has been outgrown by the country (Rakove, list 8, 13).
There were many major arguments in the debate over expanding suffrage. Those major arguments consisted mostly of the pros and cons of the debate over expanding the suffrage during the age of Jackson. There were many valid arguments, but also many invalid arguments during that time. There were many pros in the debate over suffrage during the age of Jackson. The Jacksonian democracy is associated with the common man.
In a democracy, like the United States, Americans choose government officials. The elected officials then serve for a term of office. The prevalence of single-member district is one of the most important of the features of the electoral system. Almost all elections held are a single-member election, which means they are contest in which only one candidate is elected to each office on the ballot. The winner of the election is the one who received the largest number of votes, or plurality.
It allows them to use tactics such as packing and cracking which can have a tremendous impact on elections. Packing is when politicians draw out district maps for each party based on population. Packing can swing the vote because the population of one party could out weight the population of the minority party within the same district, causing the entire district to swing with the majority. Voters feel that the other tactic, cracking, gives them a disadvantage because the political parties are being spread out between multiple districts which causes one district to have the majority party in multiple areas (King, Elizabeth). When the politicians of the party in power have drawn out the voters’ map, they maintain power over the lines of the map.
The main advantage is that it removes the concentration of power from one individual. This ensures that abuse of power is limited. Giving different individuals from varying parties will also result in the creation of checks and balances in the executive. A lieutenant governor from the Democratic Party will be able to check the activities and the undertakings of a Republican governor thus ensuring that they operate within the confines of the law and the powers of their office. Also, the system allows for the introduction or the enforcement of the manifestos held by both parties, thereby resulting in greater benefits to the population.
It also makes political parties favored over larger areas because the candidates must get the votes of less populated states, which tend to have much more area in
Every four years we hold an election to decide who will be hold the office for the President of the United States. The founding fathers established the Electoral College to keep a candidate from manipulating the publics opinion and keep them from gaining absolute power. It also was set up so that smaller states would be able to have same power or say as the bigger states (Why the Electoral College). Each state is giving “Electors” based on the number of members it has in the U.S. House of Representatives, and also gets a 2 Electors for the two members they have in the U.S. Senate. Washington D.C. however only has 3 Electors.
Nowadays our world is changing hourly – its political, social and economic global picture depends on the decisions (more or less important, but still important), which are taken every minute. Sometimes it seems that all significant events have taken place, moreover it was a long time ago. At the same time we forget that there are areas of life, our daily lives, which have been completely different recently. In modern Western societies the right to receive education and to vote for women is natural part of life, contrast to the Third world counties, where women still do not have opportunity to take part in decision-making and influence various spheres of life in their countries. Skeptics may wonder: “What is so special about the fact that women are allowed to vote?”
An important characteristic of FPTP is that only the first preference matters, all other information is useless for the outcome. This leads to a problem that voters may not reflect their real preferences. For example, voters may forecast the one who has the best chance to win, and candidates with least vote have to face the reality that they have no chance winning the election. Therefore, such information may change how they behave, and tactical voting is possible to change the outcome. For example, it may turn out that casting a ballot for the person with more chances to defeat the candidate you dislike.
Many people believe that the election plays the most important role in democracy. Because a free and fair election holds the government responsible and forces it to behave on voter's interest. However, some scholars find evidence that election itself is not enough to hold politicians responsible if the institutions are not shaping incentives in a correct way. In other words, the role of the election on democracy, whether it helps to serve the interest of the public or specific groups, depends on other political institutions. I