In Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen, and Our Mutual Friend, by Charles Dickens, two proposals, despite their few effective lines, end up being horrendously uneffective. In the first, William Collins proposes to Elizabeth Bennett, and in the latter, Bradley Headstone-his last name, which he will need after he dies from the painful embarrassment of his rejection- proposes to Lizzie Hexam. What makes a marriage proposal successful is a display of commitment, intimacy, and passion- though not too much or too little of any one factor! A lack of one or more of these factors, which both proposals are guilty of, will lead the proposer down the path of one of the main struggles of wooing: rejection.
Both men do make one or two seemingly effective statements. In Pride and Prejudice, William claims that it was “the particular advice and recommendation of [a] very noble lady” to marry an
…show more content…
Because not only is language important, but so is the emotion and body language present whilst using it. Needless to say, both men showed their true colors in the proposals, which offered a glimpse of what life would be like being married to them, which, without a doubt, deterred the ladies from saying yes. The proposals were imbalanced. William’s, being emotionless, and Bradley’s, being an emotional mess. A proposal is like a recipe, you must use all the ingredients and the correct amount of them, or else the final result will be nothing like the picture in the cookbook. Though, despite both of the proposals being failures in countless ways, one was a tad bit more effective than the other- yet still not effective enough. The more effective one being Bradley’s proposal to Lizzie. He uses a bit of each rhetorical device, while William is severely lacking in pathos. Overall, neither man is getting married anytime
Thompson says “I was very sure that I was going to take whoever they thought was right for me” (Source B). In some parts of the world it is tradition for a child parents to arrange a marriage, and it is seen as bad if they go against their parents because parents are seen as wiser and know best. This still does not make it alright for them to only give one day to decide. And sometimes the people do not even get to spend a day with the person they are going to spend the rest of their life with.
Wilder feels as if the little vows are the best meaningful vows. So when Mrs. Soames interrupts the ceremony, Wilder wanted us to know that Emily and George already took their vows. The point Wilder is trying to make about marriage is that to accept the little things in life more than the big. The vows are important because that’s how they actually felt
Therefore, Olivia, without procrastination, made a marriage proposal to Sebastian: “Blame not this haste of mine. If you mean well/Now go with me and with this holy man/Into the chantry… And underneath that consecrated roof/Plight me the full assurance of your faith” (312). To maintain utmost secrecy, Olivia promises Sebastian confidentiality until such time as Sebastian becomes ready to divulge the news of their marriage. In acceptance, Sebastian pledges his everlasting faithfulness to Olivia.
There is controversy in the classical scholarly community on the subject of why the first four books of the Odyssey focus on Telemachus. Jenkins claims it’s a tribute to Odysseus because Telemachus is a part of him. I disagree because though the Odyssey primarily depicts Odysseus’ nostos, it is also driven by Telemachus’ maturation in tact and intelligence to significance beyond simply coming of age. There are several scenes in the first four books and the last quarter of the epic in which Telemachus make speeches with key similarities that invoke identical responses from Penelope and the suitors.
From the same scene, it previously showed how he knew the risks involved in the marriage, “These violent delights have violent ends / And in their triumph die, like fire and powder, / Which, as they kiss, consume.” (Shakespeare 2.5.9-11) In this statement he uses a metaphor, comparing the couple to fire and powder, which when brought together can have explosive reactions, to explain that the couple is rushing into the relationship too fast, and they are most likely feeling, not love, but lust. This clarifies that despite these many signs for him to not marry them, he continues to do so; which inevitably induces their
Through both passages the use of rhetorical appeals are used differently to persuade each woman to accept the proposal. While the speaker in Jane Austin’s proposal uses logos and lists the logical reasons on why the woman should marry Mr. Collins, the speaker in Charles Dickens’ uses pathos to win over his woman by using emotions and passionate words. The woman hearing the proposal from Austen would probably feel resentment toward the man, the woman hearing Dickens’ would feel a strong attraction towards the man proposing. In Austen’s passage Mr. Collins is giving his marriage proposal almost as if it’s a business agreement than a marriage.
He assumes that Elizabeth will not hesitate to marry him. Mr. Collins is quite direct within his proposal, lending to why the proposal is an ineffective piece of
Even though they have not spoken more than 1000 words and are supposed to be enemies, they decide to marry in secret. Instead of thinking of the consequences and putting
Edith Wharton stated once that at some stage in a story there will be that turning point or “illuminating incident” that would be a window that opens to convey the whole message and show the deeper meaning of the work. Basing this on Pride and Prejudice, the most significant, shifting point would be when Elizabeth realizes that her first impression has done her wrong, and that she’s the one being prejudicial, not Mr. Darcy. Jane Austen follows the development of Elizabeth’s and Darcy’s relationship in how they both change in order to overcome their own vanities and be able to love each other. Elizabeth’s visit to Pemberley, accompanied by her aunt and uncle, causes her to reconsider her thoughts about Mr. Darcy and shows how naïve and inconsiderate she was. After knowing the truth, Elizabeth’s reaction help build up the main themes of Pride and Prejudice which is to learn before making any judgments.
On the other hand, Wilde explores how social relationships can influence the compatibility of marriage between individuals. Both of these factors acts as an obstacle for Jack as he seeks approval to marry Gwendolen Fairfax. Oscar Wilde demonstrates the importance of social relationships and the social status as the determining factors for the compatibility of marriage and love during the Victorian era. The Victorians valued one’s social status as it was seen at the utmost importance when it comes to marriage.
Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility is a great example of her works that looks at the role of women in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Austen shows us the gender roles inflicted on women during this time period and how they are perceived. We see the strict gender roles that women were adhered to and the struggle for identity as a woman. Central to this novel is the vulnerability of women and the expectations surrounding gender influence everything and produce define results. Gender definitely determines and structures the world in which these characters live.
The idea that marriage is treated as a business is expressly shown by multiple characters. The most recognizable example is Lady Bracknell after she learns that Jack proposed to her daughter, Gwendolen. “Lady Bracknell: I feel bound to tell you that you are not down on my list of eligible young men,
Jane Austen lived in a period at the turn from the eighteenth century to the nineteenth century, which was a period of mixed thoughts, which conflicted all the times. Among all the conflicts, the most important one was the disparity in social status between men and women. Not only men’s status was in the center of the society but also common people thought it was right that men were much more important than women were. In those days girls were neither allowed nor expected to study much because they did not have to work for a living. They were supposed to stay at home and look beautiful in order to get suitable husbands.
The potential marriage of Miss Morton to Robert or Edward is based on her financial endowment; “of Robert’s marrying Miss Morton’… ‘The lady, I suppose, has no choice in the affair.’ ‘Choice? —how do you mean?’ ‘I only mean, that I suppose from your manner of speaking it must be the same to Miss Morton whether she marry Edward or Robert” (Austen 278). Austen discusses a valid point where women are married because of financial endowment than for love with little choice in the matter. In the case of Willoughby, he married Miss Gray for “Fifty thousand pounds, my dear.
In T.S. Eliot’s “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” I believe Prufrock’s overwhelming question is a marriage proposal because of the severity of his indecisiveness and inner debate of whether or not to ask it. I also believe he does not ask this question because he is in self-denial of his indecisiveness, old, afraid of rejection, and wants to be sure of her answer before he asks the question. Prufrock does not reference marriage in this poem while determining whether or not to court the woman and ask the overwhelming question, so it is unclear if he means to ask the woman he is in love with to marry him or to go out with him. However, due to the severity of his indecisiveness and his constant excuses as discussed, I believe Prufrock treats the overwhelming question with high importance because of its risk. This high risk and importance are logical because if the question is a proposal, then the answer is serious and has the potential to be life-changing.