Activity#1: The Pros and Cons of Testing from Two Perspectives Standardized testing is advantageous in many ways. One of the most important benefits is that standardized testing holds teachers and schools responsible for teaching students what they should know, since the student’s achievements in these tests become public record and schools and teachers can come under scrutiny if the scores indicated that they aren’t up to the par. It also guides teachers and helps them determine what to teach and pinpoint and determine the gaps where the student needs to invest more time and effort in order to fill it. Standardized tests are considered practical because they consume less time (all the test-takers do the test at the same time). Testing has
2). Respectively, in order to avoid the discriminating practices and to prepare the people with disabilities to the normal life functioning, numerous opportunities for their postsecondary educations have been developed. The equal opportunities have become the major concern of the policy makers at this stage. However, even when the students enroll for the postsecondary education, they tend to face a wide range of barriers, including the lack of professionalism among the staff, the lower expectations, the physical demands. Under the mentioned conditions, one of the essential requirements to the education developers are the “improvements in assistive technology” (Herring, 2012, p. 29).
Paying students will lead to practical complications and issues in society. The source of the evidence is from the article, “Praireecothrifter.com - Should parents pay for good grades?” The evidence says “Many teachers also say paying students for grades leads to practical problems.” Some of the situations that could occur are pressure to inflate grades or conflict with students and parents. These are some of the effects that could occur if kids keep on receiving money for exceptional grades. In conclusion, paying students is a situation for schools and will cause issues in our
Do you struggle with taking tests? Do you wish that you never had a take a test again, well so do I? Standardized testing is a topic that many people would argue. Some people believe that all kids should be required to take these tests and that standardized testing is a good thing, but others argue that it puts too much pressure on kids. I believe that it puts too much stress on kids and it doesn’t show their full potential.
Finding a magnificent way of motivating students to engage in a classroom can channel student energy into a positive learning. Though, students may tend to get shy away from sharing their thoughts on the subject when topics are controversial or taboo. In the usual way into the debate, there are two teams that are presenting a resolution or topic that they will debate, where each team will be given a set period of time to prepare an argument. Actually, there are several formats for the debates. Also, rules will definitely vary from one competition to another.
This choice of deciding a person 's entrance or exclusion has its share of supporters. However, the effectiveness of standardized testing is questionable amongst some. Certainly, critics oppose standardized tests with the rationale that they do not accurately measure students ' knowledge, and they are expensive and stressful. For example, envision a high school student that, in terms of academic intelligence, measures far beyond par when it
Incorporating Continuous Assessment with Exams Examinations have been the gold standard for measuring the performance of students at the university level in the educational system. However, it may be possible that continuous assessment is more accurate for measuring overall student performance due to the fact that students are given different types of tasks to assess their knowledge, such as homework, papers, and quizzes. Exams have many pros and cons, but measuring a student’s performance solely on exams seems to be an outdated strategy. A combination of exams and continuous assessment is necessary in order to accurately assess student performance because they both have advantages and disadvantages. Although continuous assessment may be increasing
As reported by the Office of Work/Life of the Columbia University there are both pros and cons of standardized testing. They state that the main benefit is that these tests make schools and teachers accountable, and that they should teach what students need to know for these tests. This, however, has a con; teachers may lose jobs and schools may be even shut if students repeatedly, which will put extreme pressure on both parties, in turn, causing them to teach only what would be necessary, hindering a student’s potential. Another pro included in this report is the ability that it gives educational boards to evaluate sub-groups and develop programs so as to better educate them. Standardized tests also allow parents to see how their children are doing in school compared to the country, state, or municipality.
These tests are invasive, expensive, and counterproductive. If schools began to use the funds for more useful and practical activities such as education programs for students, parents, and teachers it could make an immense difference. This topic is important due to the cruciality of this issue in the school systems today. Student drug abuse is frightening
This can also lead to negative health consequences related to stress (Columbia University). Today, the importance given to these exams is so big that students have to retreat from their everyday activities, which are also important for a good development and learning, in order to prepare for the exam. Columbia University also explains this, saying that the success of schools is independent from the performance of students since funds are given to schools that do well. This can be seen for many students as a huge responsibility, creating an unhealthy competition. Many times students stop doing the things they like and that are important (play and exercise) to prepare for these kind of tests (Columbia University).
High-stake testing is suppose to help teachers and students become well equipped in the future. However, it seems to contradict what teachers are trying to establish for students. Schools should reevaluate high-stake testing because tests are not accurately graded, tests are intelligence based, and tests creates curriculum conformity. High-stake tests are not accurately graded and are inconsistent. Students’ futures are in the hands of these unbiased scorers, yet these employees have an