ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of A Codified Constitution

651 Words3 Pages

There are many arguments for having a codified constitution, or keeping our unwritten one. Since 1997, many constitutional reforms have been made. The difference between an uncodified and codified is that in an uncodified constitution, it is not confined to one document, but in a variety. In Britain, our constitution comes from a range of sources including common and statute law, treaties, conventions and historical documents such as the Magna Carta. However, a codified, or written, constitution is found in one document. Arguments for an uncodified constitution include flexibility and allows for an effective and responsible government. On the other hand, a codified constitution would make it easier for people to understand their civil liberties and clearly defines the separation of powers between the Executive, the Judiciary and the Legislature.

Constitutional reforms are becoming increasingly important in Parliament, especially after the year 1997 when Labour and Tony Blair came to …show more content…

Our alliances with other European countries somewhat rely on Britain having similar legal proceedings. For example, trade and relations between China and the EU are quite stilted due to the very different systems used to run the country. This shows that Britain should adopt a codified constitution, so that relations between Britain and the EU do not get worse.

Another reason to have a codified constitution is that most of the work has already been completed. For example, we already have a Human Rights Act and therefore all a codified constitution would do is enshrine this in our law system.

In conclusion, whilst more reasons are coming up about why to have a codified constitution, the case for an uncodified constitution is still much stronger with many great points such as making an effective but responsible

Show More
Related

  • Effects Of Improvements On The Articles Of Confederation

    191 Words  | 1 Pages

    Before the U.S. Constitution there was the Articles of Confederation. The document could declare war, negotiate treaties, and control foreign affairs. It couldn’t enforce laws, tax, and raise its own army. What the Articles Of Confederation lacked was a strong central government. Alexander Hamilton called for a constitutional convention in 1786, and it took place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787.

    Read More

  • Us Constitution Outdated

    1367 Words  | 6 Pages

    The constitution of the United States is an insightful and revolutionary idea of how a government should be practiced in order to prevent a greedy, corrupt form of government from establishing and taking over its people. The US government is founded on the principle that it works for its people, meaning that whatever is legislated is meant only for the benefit of the American people. However, the Constitution is at this point flawed due to the fact that many of its proclamations are vague and outdated, and has to be left to interpretation as to what the framers truly intended of it. This is dangerous because it further divides the nation when Americans believe in different forms of what is constitutionally righteous, and this may start a civil

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States has worked under two constitutions. Articles of Confederation was the first constitution in our nation. It was in effect from March 1st, 1781, after Maryland ratified it. Articles of Confederation was replaced by The Constitution on June 21, 1788, which was ratified by New Hampshire. The main principles behind the modern constitution were human rights, accountability, power separation, representative government, and independence of judiciary.

    Read More

  • Constitution Dbq

    790 Words  | 4 Pages

    The two were very different as one was good while the other was bad. The Constitution had more power to serve the nation as one. The two were very different as one was good while the other was bad. The Constitution had more power to serve the nation as one. As said by John Jay in Document G, “Reflect that the [Constitution] comes recommended to you by men and fellow citizens . . .

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Thematic Essay

    379 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation was written when the United States was a fairly new country, and from the people wanting to create a different government from the king of England. Although this document respected individual rights, it was too loose of a document that could drive the country to success. After revising what they had created, the founding father of the us the created the us constitution. It was more strict, but still valued peoples rights.

    Read More

  • Essay On Ratifying The Constitution

    457 Words  | 2 Pages

    The constitution has saved our country from being like England/Britain and has saved us falling apart. The constitution has kept us from ending up like other country that are formed off the strong being in charge and surviving and the weak dying or ending up like a monarchy or a dictatorship like other country are and the constitution everyone in our country has survived and no more

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Us And Texas Constitution

    985 Words  | 4 Pages

    But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Us Constitution

    668 Words  | 3 Pages

    1. Personally, I believe the constitution was the better document because it had more power. The articles of confederation gave the states more power than congress had, and because of this states either did was it said or did not. Because of the states having more power over Congress, the states did not focus on the needs of the whole country but only cared for their own state and what is best for their people. The constitution is better because it was easier to make changes and amendments to it.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

    506 Words  | 3 Pages

    Written in 1787 and established in 1788, The Constitution is one of the most famous government systems in the world, laying down the foundation for the world we know today. It’s predecessor, the Articles of Confederation, was not nearly as long-lasting, being scrapped after just 10 years. However, both documents had a similar idea: giving power to the people and preventing the rise of a king. One huge difference is that the Constitution established a much stronger government than the Articles of Confederation. With the Articles, there was almost no government, leading to big problems.

    Read More

  • Causes And Flaws Of The Articles Of Confederation

    310 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Constitution was a document that was written by our Founding Fathers. It defines what our government is and what it does. It is the basic blueprint for all the laws in the country and it provides the three branches of the U.S government the power it needs to rule this nation effectively. But the Constitution wasn’t always how it is now, it used to be called the Articles of Confederation and it had many problems that are no longer present in our current Constitution.

    Read More

  • DBQ Essay: The United States Constitution

    1159 Words  | 5 Pages

    DBQ Essay The United States Constitution is a document that or founding fathers made in order to replace the failing Articles of Confederation (A of C). Under the Constitution, the current government and states don’t have the problems they faced when the A of C was in action. The Constitution was created in 1788, and held an idea that the whole nation was nervous about. This idea was a strong national government, and the Federalist assured the people that this new government would work. The framers of the Constitution decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the A of C had many problems, there was a need for the layout of new government, rights, and laws, and there was a need for the Federal

    Read More

  • What Are The Flaws Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    675 Words  | 3 Pages

    The reason that the Articles of Confederation established such a weak government was because the colonists were afraid that a strong central government would become tyrannical and oppressive like the British were towards the colonists. However, instead of leading to the downfall of America, the deficiencies that were evident in the Articles of Confederation furthered the definition of the principles of America because the insufficient government of that time voiced a need for a stronger government. To answer this need, the colonists passed the Constitution of the United States. The founding fathers ratified the Constitution in 1787, and it established a much stronger government than the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution founded the laws that would govern America for centuries; it was a crucial factor in the development of the identity of America.

    Read More

  • Texas Constitution Pros And Cons

    762 Words  | 4 Pages

    A constitution is the fundamental law by which a nation or a state is governed and organized. It establishes the framework of government, delegates the powers and duties of governmental bodies, and defines the relationship between the government and their citizens. Texas current constitution was adopted in 1876, and since then Texas voters have approved more than 467 amendments to this document. The word “amendment” is defined as the act or process of changing the words or the meaning of a law or document (constitution). Throughout this essay I will explain the rules for amending the Texas Constitution, the attempts made at constitutional reforms during the 1970s, explain why constitutional reforms were attempted and why it ultimately failed.

    Read More

  • Essay On Canadian Constitution Vs Us Constitution

    521 Words  | 3 Pages

    The two constitution I am gonna compare are the United States of America constitution, and the Canadian constitution. Like the U.S constitution, the Canadian constitution is mostly the same since it got many of its laws from the U.S constitution. Both constitution have many provinces that they are divided into since the place is too big, as well as to divide power, as well as that they both have an executive power since they need someway to be able to divide the power. Unlike the U.S, Canada has a Queen that controls the executive government. Canada has its own version of the Bill Of Rights called Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the end of its constitution.

    Read More

  • Constitution Controversial Document

    211 Words  | 1 Pages

    Why was the Constitution a controversial document even as it was being written? Established in 1787 The Constitution was a controversial document because it was a document that could both solve the nation’s hardships and warped the Republican foundation. The Constitution on one hand would give the people a voice and the other would control the nation through a monarchy system. One of the controversies that arose from the creation of the Constitution was the question of management of commerce.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of A Codified Constitution

Open Document