Pros And Cons Of A President

Some of the things presidents have done for example is Richard Nixon and Watergate, which led him to resign rather than get impeached. Bill Clinton couldn’t keep his pants on when it came to other women, leading him to an impeachment trial. Ronald Reagan, arguably the greatest President since the 1900’s, ignored the AIDS epidemic, in other words not do anything about preventing AIDS from spreading. Those are some examples but those Presidents were actually quite successful during their times in office. I’m going to be talking about three presidents who were just straight up horrible, those being Jimmy Carter, Andrew Johnson and George W.

(Hoekstra Database) The amount of courage and optimism Regan put towards ending Communism was remarkable. He was the first president to ever really attempt to make progress with Gorbachev because many other presidents and world leaders had a great fear of Gorbachev. Regan did not fear Gorbachev, actually from his first day in office, he tried to mend the relationship between the two nations. Many people thought Regan or any other U.S. president did not have the ability to end the cold war.

Even though the president does not have the power to declare war and his or her commanding power is limited to “Army and Navy”, the powers are usually expanded during wartimes. For example, President Lincoln and President Roosevelt have both expanded the power as commander in chief during wars (337). After the 9/11 attack, President George W. Bush declared that since he was the commander in chief, he had the power to make war and take any action that seemed fit in order to protect the citizens of the United States (338). The extreme claims of powers by Bush posed a potential threat to the system of balanced powers, however, it also shows how the position of commander in chief empowers the president largely in terms of foreign

Today, the person who takes center stage in almost every news station is President Donald J. Trump. Democrats and republicans alike are at each other’s throats over this heavily debated topic: Does President Trump deserve to be president? Those on the far left have taken drastic measures to undermine his presidency. Some of those measures have caused people all around the country to believe that the second American revolution is upon us. After the president was elected into office by the people, protests broke out across the country.

He was genuinely prominent, by authentic norms, amid his first term and had a surge of fame in the most recent year, in light of enhanced execution of the economy, the lessened part of American strengths in Vietnam, the China summit, and the moscow summit.(Pious 2002) The Federal Comparability Act, for instance required the president to present an arrangement for a boost in compensation for government representatives, Nixon declined to present an arrangement to congress. This demonstration was ruled unlawful by government court in National Treasury Employees Union v. Nixon(1974) Even however Nixon disregarded the laws he saw extraordinary chances to get together with different nations. Nixon and Kissinger saw an open door when furnished conflicted eject between the Soviets and the Chinese on the Sino-Soviet fringe, and Russian pioneers were criticizing China as a noteworthy adversary of the V.S.S.R. Nixon started sending signs to Beijing, unwinding exchange controls, permitting vacationer to enter China, and permitting grain deals to a constantly hungry

That is a wait and see question, but the American voters have spoken loudly that they have no confidence in the current career politicians. And yet instead of listening to the American voters, the Republican Party desperately attempted to discredit the desires of the American voters, whom the career politicians were elected to represent and substitute their own desires. Is that anymore corrupt or dishonest than the numerous scandals effecting the country in the past eight years? How anything can be more disingenuous and in-american than engaging in activities, such as we have seen once Donald Trump received the necessary votes to be the candidate, than disregarding the wishes and votes of the American

Despite all the attempts, the Electoral College has stood the test of time. Why? Because without it, candidates would no longer be required to seek support throughout the country. They could focus solely on highly populated areas and completely ignore the needs of less populated states and regions. Before the Electoral College was officially named the way we would elect a president, the framers had narrowed it down to three options: election by the senate alone, election by the house, or electors chosen by the state 's representation in congress (McCollester).

This alarmed many people that Zachary Taylor was the first president to be assassinated. A president had never been assassinated in the presidential office at this time. People were not fully sold on the idea that a simple glass of milk and cherries could kill such a rough and tough man, but a radical thought that Taylor was assassinated was not widely

The idea suggested by a Massachusetts senator, Caleb Strong, was built off of the views of a federalist by the name of James Iredell. He believed the United States was a representation of the powers the states gave up, but it had no right to take what powers belonged to the states. The United States consisted of a group of sovereign states. The United States can only control the states with the power they allowed the government to have. Many senators and representatives liked the idea as well as Patrick Henry, James Madison, John Marshall, and Alexander Hamilton.

As a result, on April 14, 1865, John Wilkes Booth entered the Ford’s Theatre and purposefully killed Abraham Lincoln that evening. “And he probably wondered whether other guests in the box were the type who pose a threat to his plans. It didn’t matter, really; no one was going to stop him from going through with it”(Swanson 33). After that, John was on the run, and while the Union was chasing him and his injured foot was in pain, he finally made the smart decision to consequentially surrender. Booth’s patriotic last words were, “Tell Mother. . .

Our founding fathers realized that, governmentally, there were already some great divides in our country, much of it economical in quality, and much of it due to simple situation. The office of the committee and the vice presidency is the only internal decision we hold all other lawmakers are voted in at or below state level, but for these two highest offices, the election is internal. and they wanted to establish that no certain type of industrial or political circumstance could control this highest election, so they conceived of the 'electoral college ', and it always has the same number of members as the total of our congressmen in

The only judge that has been impeached was Samuel Chase, but he remained in office due to a vote of the senate. In conclusion, checks and balances are what help make our government run smoothly. Without this system, it would be much more possible that our government could result in a tyranny, with one branch having much more power than the other. That is why our system of checks and balances are so important to our

With statistics shown about how the number of electors each state gets isn 't even fair, and that smaller states really do get more of an advantage it leads me to really question why they even have this system. America is about freedom, the freedom to choose your leader, the freedom to vote for laws, and the freedom to vote for who is eligible to pass these laws. If we are promised all these freedoms why is it that there is a whole complicated system not everyone even knows about that actually proves the popular votes of the people do not decipher our president? I believe it should be banned from use due to the unfairness of the process as a

With that being said, Merrick Garland is ignoring the representation of the people who voted for Obama during the final year in office. He says “the people should decide” and they did through the president they elected. Mitch McConnell referred to congress’s ability to check the president’s power by withholding consent. Mitch McConnell plans to withhold consent until next election, but what stopping him from obstructing the process for as long as he wants? There doesn’t seem to be any constitutional restrictions on how long congress can withhold.

Question 1 This ‘controversy’ is not always a controversy, sometimes I wish it was maore of a controversy. When the President and the entire Congress is held by one party there is not usually and friction between the two branches. The more divided the exective, senate, and representatives are the more party politics and friction play a role.