Pros And Cons Of Abolishing Freedom Of The States

690 Words3 Pages

1) First, Luther Martin believes that the constitution is abolishing the freedom of the states. He asserts that the United States are simply too large to be united under one government. Governments that work with a centralized government are small. Second, he is not pleased with the amount of power that Congress has. He does not think that it should have the power to collect taxes, duties, imports, or excises. He’s saying that congress is not accountable to the states. Suddenly, all of the power to tax and appoint people to collect those taxes would be in the hands of the general government, not the states. Lastly, he states the constitution was created by people who were looking for their own gain. As a consequence, they sacrificed the happiness and freedom of the states. In short, Martin believes that the constitution is taking away the states governments and as a …show more content…

Their one goal was to obtain freedom from Britain. They could all agree that they did not want a monarchy and that bonded them together. They could also all agree that they wanted to have the power in the states. Now that they had achieved this, their individual values came out and they began to fight for the power that they had just attained. Some of these values included the states verses national power, one of the biggest debates in the convention. Furthermore, they were creating a completely new government from scratch. They had to figure out how much power each person, state, and the national government would have. In addition, they had to create completely new government with all of the new laws and regulation that went with it. With all of these decision to be made, there was bound to be contention. In the end, it boils down to the fact that they no longer had a common cause. Now that the revolution was over, they were left with a myriad of decisions to be made for their new nation all of which caused

Open Document