Does your vote really matter? In our complicated election, will your vote matter ever really matter. The Electoral College should be abolished, for its lack of representation of America’s votes. In our most recent election, the electoral college played a huge part in deciding who would be the leader of our country. Though Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, due to the electoral college, what the majority of the people in our country did not matter and Donald Trump won through electoral votes.
Some believe that the electoral college is a good thing for many reason. Tyler Lewis an Author in a Slate article states that “It would ensure the outcome of the presidency”. He continues to try and explain it in an example of the election of 2008. He
…show more content…
One states that it would lead to a more certain election, which is false, there is no difference between a miscount in the electoral college and a miscount in a popular vote, both are miscounts and must be fixed. They both are going to happen, in this election there were a total of four accounts of voter fraud. I would say in this election the total number of votes for each candidate is very certain. The next supporting claim to the electoral college is almost as weak as the other. It would not matter who’s president. Even if say Romney was popular in the south, that would not mean anything in a popular vote. If someone lived in the south and voted for a president their vote would count for one of the total votes that candidate would receive, no matter of their origin. If Romney ran in an election only counting the popular vote he would already have the votes of the south, therefore not have any incentive to campaign there. However, what is the difference between that and the current campaign. If Romney say had a solid grip in Ohio why would he have a reason to ever step foot in Ohio if he knew he would already had their …show more content…
It creates the issue that the outcome of the popular vote and electoral vote are different. This creates an issue between the people, where a majority of America voted for a candidate and that candidate didn’t win the presidency. It brings the attention if the people vote for the president why doesn’t our vote matter. Another reason the electoral college should be abolished is because your vote doesn’t count as a full vote, it counts as a fraction of a vote. What your vote counts towards is a winner takes all system in every state. So your vote counts as a fraction to the real amounts of votes in that state. If you’d vote for a candidate and the rest of your state votes for another candidate your vote is almost as if it doesn’t exist. These reasons show why the electoral college should be
The Electoral College exists, according to the Federalist Papers, in order to account for the opportunity of the tyranny of the majority or factions. It gives us the responsibility of choosing the President and members that are the best for us that prevents from bias opinions on who is chosen. The reason that the Constitution calls for this extra layer, rather than just providing for the direct election of the president, is that it will harm us a whole. James Madison worried about what he called "factions.” Until today, we are afraid of what Madison called, "the tyranny of the majority" – was that a faction could overgrow 50% of our population, at which point could sacrifice the rights of other citizens.
In the case of close voting results between two candidates, the Electoral College prohibits the recounting for the entire nation, all the while, still allowing states to recount if necessary. This will overall reduce legal challenges and the chaos of electing a new president. In Seymour Spilerman’s article, “The Case for Keeping the Electoral College”, he refers to the close election between George W. Bush and Al Gore in 2000 to further explain the positive solutions provided through the Electoral College. Spilerman shares, “Had the president been determined by the national popular vote, a nationwide recount would have been likely, requiring tabulation of the 101 million votes cast in the country, along with a consideration of the rejects,” (Spilerman). If the election were based on the population vote, it would have created more turmoil for the electorates and the candidates.
The first words in the Constitution are “We the people”, yet the Electoral College takes away power from the people to directly elect a President. To better understand the Electoral College, we will delve into the basics of the Electoral College and presidential elections, the pros and cons of the Electoral College in modern times, and a specific instance in which the Electoral College majorly affected the outcome of an election. The government should abolish the Electoral College, so United States citizens can directly elect whom they feel should head the Executive Branch. To begin, the Electoral College is a process, not an educational institution.
Advocates of the Electoral College may think that if a popular vote was instated, candidates would just focus on the larger populated areas; however, don’t they
What is the Electoral College? The Electoral College is a system in which the president and vice president are chosen indirectly, alternatively, having them chosen by the direct popular vote of the people. Through the Electoral College, a candidate must receive a majority of the electoral votes to be declared president. If neither candidate obtains a majority, the US House of Representatives selects the president from the top three contenders. There are many positives and negatives regarding this system of government and after researching and analyzing this topic, I was able to take a stance on whether or not the Electoral College should or should not be abolished.
The United States Electoral College is an American system designed by the founding fathers to conduct elections. However, it has become subject to controversy in the 2016 Presidential election. The unique aspect of the Electoral College is how electors are awarded to presidential candidates using a state-by-state method of determining the number of electors. While the Electoral College is fundamental to the founders of America to protect the nation, its fatal flaws are too damaging to the people of the United States. In my opinion, the Electoral College needs to be reexamined in order to establish a new way of electing Presidents and Vice Presidents.
The Electoral College should be abolished because of the occasions where presidents have won without popular vote, the number of electoral votes each state gets, today people are more educated and their vote should be counted one person, one vote. There have been four occasions where the president elected did not win the majority vote because of the Electoral College. One of the four elections was in 1824 when John Quincy Adams was elected president even though he did not receive the majority vote. He received 84 electoral votes, Henry Clay received 37, Andrew Jackson received 99 and William Crawford received 41. None of the four candidates received 51% if electoral college so the vote went to the House of Representatives.
If we somehow happened to be a capable vote, then we ought to have the capacity to really pick who might be president. The Electoral College removes that from us. The Electoral College is not by any stretch of the imagination reasonable for our rights and our opportunity. It, for the most part, takes away the ability to vote the president. The Electoral College was made in a period when votes were harder to gather and number.
Even though the Electoral College has been here since the beginning of the establishment of the U.S I believe it should be abolished. As a U.S citizen does your vote matter to who is elected? Every four years the United States has a presidential election. Your vote for the presidential nominee is considered to fall into the category of a popular vote.
However, our Founding Fathers did not intended a pure democracy, being a pure democracy is not universally good, due to it leads to tyranny of the majority and rejects compromise which could damage the union. Thus, the electoral college has proven to be operating effectively for more than 200 years, due to our Founding Fathers created an efficacious, carefully designed election system through vigorous debate and deliberation. Altogether, the electoral college should be preserved, due to it
Since the inception of our constitution in 1787, there has only been 4 elections where the Electoral College has allowed the future president-elect candidate to win the election, despite losing the popular vote. 4/57 elections is probably something that political scientists don’t lose sleep over, but it is a topic that is worth mentioning and discussing, especially after the controversial presidential election in 2000. From my point of view, I believe that the method we use in selecting our presidents is flawed and ineffective for a couple of reasons. First, the Electoral College has far fewer votes than the American people, yet their vote has a lot more meaning. With 538 delegates representing the Electoral College, it is unfair and inequitable to the millions of people who devote their time and energy to stand in long
To Dan Newhouse, Although some people say the electoral college is best for the public, it is actually putting chains on their opinions. Many people would say that the founding fathers made the electoral college because it was the best way to vote in their time. But what they don’t realise is that the electoral college is outdated, we have more people, and technology now, and that allows everyone to vote. That is why the electoral college should be stopped, so the chains that keep the citizens opinion’s down are broken.
As an encouragement to vote most of us have probably been told, “every vote counts” at some point in our lives. In reality, this is not true in presidential elections due to the Electoral College and what it does. The Electoral College has flaws in it that can prohibit the outcome of the election from accurately reflecting whom a majority the people of the country cast their vote for. Not only will he abolishment of the electoral college change the outcome of elections, it can change the whole campaign process and the way some people in less represented states feel about voting increasing voter turnout.
The Electoral College is very helpful in terms of giving individual states the chance to vote without being overruled by large cities. There is many controversy around such a thing, for many people believe that the Electoral College silences the actual vote of the citizens of the United States of America. The Electoral College is an innovative way to give equal chances, and I do believe that it is a clever way to do such a thing, though many believe that there should be a better way to run an election, or to simply let the candidate win off of the popular vote only. In conclusion, I support the cause and way the electoral college is used to help give states/provinces an equal vote to that of major cities, to make it easier correct mistakes
The Electoral College system assures balanced power between the states, puts the independent parties under control, grants balanced voting, and supports the major political parties. The Electoral College has proven itself to be very sufficient in determining the president and the vice president of the United States. Since this system has been successful since our Founding Fathers created it, there should be no reason as to why we should get rid of the Electoral