Anti Euthanasia Argumentative Essay

4.3.3 Anti-Euthanasia Arguments

Firstly, opponents argue that not all deaths are painful. And even though diseases are painful and suffering, the patient should bear such a suffering as a human being [14]. Religious people believe that all human being is the decision of God, and that correpondingly imposes certain limits on us. Our lives are not only solely for us to deal with. This means to kill oneself, or to require someone else to do it, is to deny the will of God, and God's rights over our lives since It is also God’s right to choose our life scan and the way to end our lives. Religious figures usually oppose euthanasia because some of them belief put positive value in suffering. Christianity firmly believe that suffering take account

[14] The judicial sense of "homicide" includes any intervention undertaken with the expressed intention of terminating a life, even alleviate intractable desease. Not all homicide is illegitimate but it is still not the current status of euthanasia, in most countries. The term "euthanasia" is usually defined to the active variety; the website of University of Washington shows that "euthanasia commonly means that the medical staff would implement some action directly, for instance by giving a lethal injection, to terminate the patient's life". We must mention that Physician-assisted suicide is not catalogued as euthanasia in state Oregon in US, [15] hence physician assisted suidice is legitimate under the Oregon Death though it is a dignity Act, it is not legally classified as suicide either, and despite its name, its way. Unlike physician-assisted suicide, taking patient attitude into account, withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments with their consent (voluntary) is almost unanimously considered, at least in the United States [16], to be legal. The use of pain medication in order to alleviate suffering, even though it accelerate death, has been held legal in several court sentences. Some administrations around the world have legalized to admit voluntary

Euthanasia: ethics line drawing from point-of-view of society

Point Descriptions Location from Left

NP Completely oppose euthanasia Left

P1 Some governments around the world have legalized voluntary euthanasia. However, it is still commonly considered to be criminal homicide. 5.0/10.0

SC1 Once euthanasia is permitted, laws should be set up to ensure euthanasia will not become mutual criminal, i.e., it must be performed at the truthful wish of the patient. 6.5/10.0

SC2 Respecting human rights is the precondition of exercising human rights. 6.0/10.0

PP Accept euthanasia as a legal treatment. Supervise the development and legal approval issues of euthanasia. Right

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, currently, the artificial womb, the genome editing with CRISPR method and the euthanasia have not be approved legally and accepted by the general public because of some ethical issues involved in these advanced medical systems and technologies. However, they do benefit people who have health problems or potential problems. To summarize, ethical issues and hi-tech innovations should be kept in balance so that the progress of our human will be in harmony and