ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Anti Feds

872 Words4 Pages

At one time in America, we were operating under the Articles of Confederation but there were many problems. So, we set out to create a new govt (Constitution) but there were many disagreements between N and S and big states and small states so we had to compromise. Once Constitution was created, finally there was still a debate between feds and anti feds about whether or not it should be ratified. After many compromises to solve our government we finally got one and we created a government that lasted till this day for us. First, there were a lot of problems with the Articles of Confederation. The Articles were not at all powerful and were not good for America. The US didn’t have a lot of money and they barely had any power. Under the Articles, the state possessed more power than the federal government.The people who had the power were the people and the state governments. They had more power than the federal government. The Federal Government had no power to tax and no way to raise an army. I know this because in document 2 the picture shows that they had no power to tax the …show more content…

The feds wanted to ratify it because they liked it, but they wanted to make it better. . The Anti feds wanted a Bill of Rights because they wanted it to protect people’s rights, the feds thought they didn’t need one. When they ratified they thought that it would be better and create a better government for them and the people..I know this because in doc 7 it says, “To reach an agreement which allowed all states to ratify. James madison added bill of rights to constitution.” Also, “The feds wanted a strong government and no bill of rights, the anti feds wanted more power and states and a bill of rights.” This shows that the feds and anti feds both wanted two different things. The feds and anti feds were all created because we disagreed on a

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    216 Words  | 1 Pages

    The articles of Confederation were drafted with an aim to succeed, but there were some allocations that were not considered. The first concern that was not considered was how powerful the federal government was supposed to be. The founding fathers knew that confederation was going to make the United States a unit, which means that decisions such as international relations, was to be controlled centrally. The congress and the executive were not given sufficient powers to engage military action. The congress had to borrow military empowerment from the states.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    367 Words  | 2 Pages

    The articles of confederation is the first national government of the United states America, however, this constitution is flawed. The new independent nation needed an organization that would hold all of the states together, send a military off in the future if needed and of course a stronger economy. The articles seemed to be the best route to take for the United States in order to build unity in their nation. The U.S wanted to avoid higher power like Great Britain with King George the third. They wanted to spread power to the people evenly.

    Read More

  • Explain The Flaws When It Came To The Articles Of Confederation

    297 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are also a lot of flaws when it came the The Articles of Confederation. For example, if they had agreed to the Article the Congress could not draft troops, the states had to contribute men for war. Another thing

    Read More

  • Comparing The Federalists And Antifederalist During The Constitutional Convention Of 1787

    929 Words  | 4 Pages

    The main debate was about individual rights. Originally, the Constitution lacked a bill of rights. Anti-federalists insisted that a bill of rights be added to the Constitution to expressly grant freedoms to the country. On the other hand, federalist James Madison believed the Constitution was enough, and adding a bill of rights was unnecessary. As southern states did with slavery, antifederalists refused to ratify the Constitution without a bill of rights.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Pros And Cons

    1054 Words  | 5 Pages

    This past week, the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia. They addressed the problems of the weak central government that exists under the Articles of Confederation. Both our fellow Federalists and the Anti federalists, were present at this meeting. The Anti federalists are continuing to fight against the Constitution, claiming that they don’t want a bigger government than the States. However, they do not have a set plan like us.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Articles Of The Confederation

    153 Words  | 1 Pages

    The articles of the confederation was very weak plan of government but they ended up fixing it in the end. States were given most power and few powers were given to the national government. The laws were difficult to pass because only 9 out of the 13 states agreed. Congress had no power to collect taxes,regulate trade, to coin money,and had no power to create an army. There was no president or executive branch.

    Read More

  • Ratification Debate Anti-Federalists Vs. The Constitution

    100 Words  | 1 Pages

    During the ratification debate, Anti-Federalists were opposed to the Constitution. They argued that the newer system threatened liberties of the people, and failed to protect individual rights of Americans on a general scale. The Anti-Federalists weren 't exactly a united group, but instead involved many elements. One faction of Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution because they believed stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states in their entirety; Others argued that centralized government would have identical characteristics of the monarchical properties of Great Britain which they fought to sever themselves from prior. While others feared that a new government threatened personal liberties.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    647 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the following paragraph, I will describe to you the different arguments that the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had with ratifying the Constitution. Our Constitution should involve focusing on the common good and civic virtue of the people. There is no need for an overwhelming amount of power provided for the national government to where they make all of the decisions for us. A Bill of Rights would give us such things as the right to speak freely and make our own decisions that we, as a people, think is necessary for the common good. This writing will describe all of these points that support the Anti-Federalists and the reason to reject the new Constitution.

    Read More

  • What Led To The Formation Of The Anti-Federalist Groups

    799 Words  | 4 Pages

    In early 1787, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and other nationalist leaders decided to improve and create a perfect union. The Constitution was then created, and the people who supported it were called the Federalists. Led by Alexander Hamilton, the Federalist group supported the Constitution, but as soon as they introduced it to all the states, not all the people agreed and supported to what it said, and that is why the Anti-Federalist group was created. Anti-Federalist were the people who were against the Constitution and believed that it didn’t give enough rights to the individual citizens. They were constantly trying to add in The Bill of Rights to the Constitution of the United States, which they successfully did

    Read More

  • How To Treat The Constitution Revolutionary

    989 Words  | 4 Pages

    As the result, the nation split into two groups: federalists, the supporters of the constitution and the antifederalist, the people who against the constitution. The antifederalists argued that “the Constitution lacked a religious test for officeholding and the Constitution failed to guarantee a right to counsel and a right not to incriminate oneself in criminal trials, or to prohibit cruel and unusual punishments,” In response, the Congress proposed the Bill of Rights, consisted of Ten Amendments to guarantees that every citizen would have such rights as “ the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” It is also guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This new proposal gained a number of states agree to sign the constitution. The Bill of Rights saved nation from going to another bloody civil war.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists

    138 Words  | 1 Pages

    Another reason for this belief was people didn't have guaranteed rights. In conclusion this belief among others led to the Anti Federalists fighting against the constitution. The Federalists and Anti Federalists thoughts on the bill of rights like everything else was different. The Federalists believed that the bill of rights was useless. Anti-Federalists thought it was essential to making sure that peoples rights were kept safe.

    Read More

  • Dual Federalist System

    1449 Words  | 6 Pages

    There were many flaws with the Articles of Confederation for example there was not an executive branch. In article two section one of the Constitution they made it so the President had executive power along with a Vice President. Another issue was the fact that there were not any federal courts. This was changed in article three section one and two, and they stated that the judicial power will be held by one supreme court with inferior courts. There also was no power to tax or regulate commerce.

    Read More

  • Constitution Surpass

    1728 Words  | 7 Pages

    Why the Constitution Surpasses the Articles of Confederation Today in history, the United States still obeys the Constitution.   As everyone knows, it took bravery, courage, and bloodshed for the U.S. to keep and have this document.  It took a great mind and a lot of trial and error to create the perfect form of government that was right and fair to all the people.  

    Read More

  • What Are The Key Features Of The Articles Of Confederation

    526 Words  | 3 Pages

    To give some background, the Articles of Confederation was a document signed by the 13 original colonies that established the United States of America as a confederation of sovereign states and served as its first constitution. The Articles of Confederation created a nation that was “a league of friendship and perpetual union.” The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777. The Articles of Confederation became effective on March 1, 1781, after all thirteen states had ratified them. It made the states and legislature supreme.

    Read More

  • Right To Bear Arms History

    866 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791 written by James Madison. The Bill of Rights was written and added into the Constitution in order to protect the rights of the citizens. The Bill of Rights was added into the Constitution by a compromise between the Anti-Federalists and the Federalists. Federalists were citizens who supported the new Constitution. While Anti-Federalists were another group of citizens who were scared to have another king or a abusive government, basically did not support the Constitution.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Anti Feds

Open Document