Pros And Cons Of Asylum

Better Essays
An asylum is offered by one State to an individual looking for shelter from another State. On account of political shelter, the exile is inside of the region of the State where the offense was conferred. A decision to grant diplomatic asylum involves derogation from the sovereignty of that State. It pulls back the wrongdoer from the locale of the regional State and constitutes mediation in matters which are solely inside of the fitness of that State [Peru]. Such derogation from territorial sovereignty cannot be recognised unless its legal basis is established in each particular case.
In this case the Havana Convention on Asylum of 1928 was challenged. It lays down certain rules relating to diplomatic asylum, but does not contain any provision
…show more content…
There is some uncertainty how far compelling reasons of humanity may justify the grant of asylum in other cases. .
An exception to this rule (asylum should not be granted to those facing regular prosecutions) can occur only if, in the guise of justice, arbitrary action is substituted for the rule of law. Such would be the case if the administration of justice were corrupted by measures clearly prompted by political aims. Asylum protects the political offender against any measures of a manifestly extra-legal character which a Government might take or attempt to take against its political opponents.
On the other hand, the safety that has been provided cannot be given against the regular usage of laws and against the legally established tribunals. In other words, Torre was accused of a crime but he could not be tried in a court because Colombia granted him asylum. The court held that “protection from the operation of regular legal proceedings” was not justified under diplomatic
Get Access