Should Smoking Remain Legal Today Because of all the Harmful Things they are made of and the Health Risks? Cigarettes have been smoked by both men and women for a long time now. However, smoking is responsible for the cause of various debilitating diseases, hence the reason why there have been debates on whether smoking should continue being legal. Notably, in the recent times, there have been various calls to illegalize smoking due to its severe effects after the ban of cigarette smoking in public places (Oriola 838). Therefore, smoking has serious health implications for both smokers and second-hand smoking hence the need for the government and relevant agencies to consider making cigarette smoking illegal.
Persuasive Argument Imagine that another world war broke out and you were chosen to fight and protect your country. What if a member of your family was diagnosed with depression except, no one knew how to treat them as we chose to forget all the bad symptoms that came from it? How about domestic issues that differ from country to country? Would you want to forget the despicable massacre that took place in Port Arthur? That massacre sparked the idea for tighter gun laws.
Government need to take serious attention to this issue because there are many cases happen which shows around 435000 people dead from use of tobacco. Even though we cannot eliminate this problem, but all we can do is to reduce the risk. For most of us, we will agree that we absolutely need to ban smoking in the public. There are so many reason that relay on this issue but I would highlight several reason such as the fume from a cigarette can affect the smoker’s health, other people and the effect to society and economies.
First of all, it has been mentioned that there is proper allowance of individual rights and corporate rights. Anti smoking activists also said that everyone has a basic right to freedom of expression, but it is limited to till that moment when it is not causing any harm or devastation to any limit. Individuals have their right to smoke but they should not persuade others or force others to join this inhuman cause. As to those who are opposed to the promotion of cigarettes , they also argue that, the society as a whole has an obligation to protect the right of individuals not to be deceived or manipulated. Hence, the ban on advertising is not going to help the affected , instead they could be deprived of the information they get from the warning pictures and statements made along with the
2. Adherence to ‘Rule of Law’ maybe due to prudent reasons and not moral reasons: Prudential reasons are the reasons to follow something for personal good. Whereas moral reasons are reason to follow for the good of society at large. For example a person quits smoking, this quitting of smoking maybe because of prudential or moral reasons . If it is by moral reasons , then the justification for quitting maybe because his neighbor’s health was at risk.
Should smoking be banned? The topic of banning cigarettes has been a controversial subject for more than a century. More than 1 billion people around the world, but considering that it harms the smoker and everyone around him, should cigarettes be prohibited? Should the right to smoke be taken away? Firstly, All doctors and scientists agree that smoking is life threatening.
I imagine that smoking activity should be banned in public places so that a new page for health and development of the whole population would be opened up. I believe that smoking should be banned in public places even though the rivals of such opinion claim that detached smokers settle on the decision to take in other individuals' smoke by going to places where it is permitted, but Smoking ought to be banned in public places as it pollutes the environment as it produces smokes that is ten times worse than the car engine exhaust in the air as the smoke produced goes directly to the human lungs and causes asthma and other far more diseases, and most people also don't enjoy having their clothes or hair smell bad just because people smoked around them. So, it’s clear that it should be illegal to smoke in public places as this would improve the health of millions of people, and that is definitely a positive development. That’s why if we leave this problem as it is, we will be adding to poverty, death tolls and higher taxes. It’s a war between the people who care and the people don’t; as smokers, cigarette companies and businesses which profit from it.
Smoking is a worldwide issue which kills several lives every day. Cigarette contained poisonous chemicals which are extremely dangerous for the survivors. Many countries use different plans to reduce smoking rate. Some countries Ban the advertisement of tobacco products to control its consumption and some put heavy taxes to slow down the sale and purchase of cigarettes to provide people a smoke free environment. Cigarette causes cancers, heart strokes and many respiratory deceases.
After all tobacco products have a long history of causing health problems in users. However, a ban such as this affects many different areas of the country. In this essay I will summarize an article about the subject, the positives of a ban such as this, and the negatives. To give a base of the subject I will begin with the positives of a ban on tobacco company advertisements. One of the issues to discuss is how tobacco company showcase their
A lifetime smoker is at high risk of developing a range of potentially different diseases. We all know that smoking is bad on our health. There are many signages everywhere especially in the pack of cigarettes saying that smoking is addictive and smoking is dangerous to our health not only to the smoker but also to the second and third hand smoker. People do smoking for their relaxation and sometimes to become only ‘in’ to their pear. There are bunches of effects of smoking that can harm as smoker.