BACKGROUND
In the first week we were introduced on the topic of Canadian confederation. What is the Canadian confederation? Well it is the process in which some British North American provinces Ontario, Quebec, Nova scotia and New Brunswick into one federation called the dominion of Canada, in 1867 Canada got confederation as a country but not complete independence since they could not control their own foreign policy it was still in the hands of Britain.
There where some provinces in which wanted the confederation and others who did not. The Confederates are Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick and the anti-confederates were The North west territory, British Columbia North, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland.
There are is
…show more content…
And this railway was very crucial to creating a market of four million consumers. (pg. 82)
Some doubters were against the 72 resolution which were mostly French Canadians that it would erase local distinctiveness, But Cartier assured to his listeners that the culture and traditions as well as religion would remain. (Martel et al, p. 83)
My thoughts on Quebec and the confederation
The main groups in Quebec in power were the French Canadians and the English Canadians so during these discussions of confederation they both wanted their interests first, but this proved quite difficult because they both needed a helping hand from each other in order to be able to control the different groups of people. They believed the confederation will be a good thing for them in an economic view especially because of the Railway, it is clear that the cooperation of French and English Canadians shaped the future of Quebec although they ignored minority groups such as the indigenous people. (Martel et al,
…show more content…
the British North America Act, 1867 (BNA Act), that legally created the Dominion of Canada was, in effect, Canada’s fifth constitution. The three constitutions immediately preceding the BNA Act established essential elements of liberal democracy, but the BNA Act was the first in which the novel and creative elements were designed by the colonists themselves, not their imperial masters (Russel, p. 115). The previous four constitutions of Canada was designed by Britain they had some influence towards it but the British North America Act 1867 (BNA Act) Was designed by the Canadians so it brought about like a feeling of independence to Canadians and it was the first steps to complete
When Confederation happened New Brunswick and Nova Scotia were thinking of joining with the other Maritime provinces to make their own confederation but John A. MacDonald convinced everyone to unify with Ontario. Many people living in the Maritimes didn’t want to join because they were worried about many things like not having an equal voice with Ontario and Quebec. They thought they had enough natural resources like fishing and mining and didn’t need the other provinces. There were positive and negative consequences of Confederation for the people in the Maritimes.
The act changed quebec into two parts and this is the beginning of britian taking over canada and creating to separate parts This map” shows the”ACT OF UNION . In 1849 Upper Canada and Lower Canada merged and two colonies became known as the Province of Canada . The new government meant equal representation for Canada East and Canada West the reason for this was English speaking people were
One of Cartier’s main goals was to unite and promote harmony within all the different groups of people in Canada. In this journey of establishing Canada, he was able to do so by looking at the whole situation when making decisions. This resulted in an unbiased choice that emphasizes equality between all Canadians. In his capacity, Cartier was able to work extensively with the parliament and politicians in both Upper and Lower Canada, where he became known as MacDonald’s ‘Siamese twin’. In his role as part of the main organ of Confederation, for instance when he worked as Acting Prime Minister in MacDonald’s absence, Cartier played key roles securing Rupert’s Land and in drafting the Manitoba and British Columbia Acts.
In conclusion, Newfoundland made the right decision in joining Confederation. This was because of Canada delivering on its promise to provide Newfoundland with family allowance, and investing in roads and infrastructure projects, and relieving the debts of the province. Newfoundlands decision of joining confederation ultimately shaped it into the successful province that it is today. I personally believe that we would not be saying the same had it not joined with Canada, which illustrates the true extent to which Newfoundlanders enjoyed prosperity
The Constitution Act of 1867 was a major part of Canada’s Constitution. It defined the Government of Canada; including the House of Commons, the Senate, and the justice and taxation system. This changed Canada because it helped make the government of Canada. If we never had this act, the government might’ve been different and never had things like the Senate, or the house of commons.
Many years ago, French and British explorers found land that they claimed and fought for, through time they turned this land into Canada. This country began named New France, ruled by the French people, then as British North America, ruled by the British people. The French and the British had frequently fought over power, but this is what ended up shaping the provinces and territories in Canada. Events that impacted Canada were the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 , then the Treaty of Paris in 1763, the Forming of Upper Canada in 1791, and the Act of the Union in 1849, when a responsible government was formed and Canada became one. The land of Canada began with an unsteady system, and ended with responsible government, having a democracy and giving
As British Columbia became larger talks about it joining confederation began to arise. Confederationists began to propose the idea of BC joining Canada, but a large amount of people also wanted to join the United States or maintain ties with Britain. A hearing was held that had equal sides anti-confederationists and confederationists. Just then Governor Seymour died and Anthony Musgrave was appointed to become his replacement. Musgrave went around to the annexationists and anti-confederationists winning them over and getting terms from them.
The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution since the United States of America was formed. This constitution wasn’t helping the states and was causing many arguments between them. After Shay’s Rebellion, when the farmers got mad about having high taxes and heavy debts, even though Shay’s Rebellion didn’t succeed it proved that something has to be done to the Articles of Confederation. What do you think the conclusion will be after the states do something about the Articles of Confederation? The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan helped create the constitution.
It was the heat of the Revolutionary war and The Thirteen Colonies were preparing to declare their independence from Britain, yet before they do so, they needed to establish a form of self-government. Through the Articles of Confederation in 1776, the colonies had established their first independent government, although with it followed many problems. These problems, although numerous, did not come without some, yet very little, success and perhaps one of the best outcomes of the Articles of Confederation is how they paved the way for the much sturdier Constitution. The Articles of Confederation had been created in a rush and by were no means a permanent form of government for the colonies.
The first few were a series of external and internal forces which led to confederation. Several internal forces pushed the creation of Canada, for example; the deadlocked government, The Railway and The great coalition. After the union of Canada East and Canada West the government had something called double majority. This meant both sides of the government needed a majority for a bill to pass instead of just a simple majority. This left the government often in a stalemate which did
I am going to write about how the Articles of confederation was revised, American democracy was made. I am also going to talk about the founding fathers who made it possible. There were two ideas that influenced the constitution. The first idea was weakened by Articles and confederation. The congress couldn’t collect any taxes, they couldn’t amend the rules, there were 13 Independent nations, there wasn’t any Judicial system, no executives, and there was only one house of the legislative.
By becoming a member of Confederation, Ontario will have access to the facilities and resources of the entire country, enabling them to grow into the West and integrate themselves into the
Introduction A constitution provides the fundamental rules and principles that govern a country. It creates many of the institutions and branches of government, and defines their powers. The Canadian constitution is the basis on which Canada was founded on. It is the pillars upon which Canada’s government was built on, as it specifies what our government can and cannot do.
First of all, the federal government was now able to deal with language and other rights issues more effectively. Since Canada now had control over the constitution, the federal government was now able to ease tensions created by French and English relations. Moreover, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms was entrenched in the Constitution. This meant that it was firmly established in Canadian law, and that it would be extremely hard for it to be removed or changed in any significant way. Likewise, the rights of Aboriginals were entrenched in the Constitution.
Areas divided into Saskatchewan and Alberta. Alberta joined the Confederation in the same year with Saskatchewan. Difficulties for joining the Confederation were how many provinces Canada would create and a financial arrengement. The creation of Alberta led an immigration boom. A variety of languages were spoken in Alberta