Parents often choose to enroll students in single gender schools because they have a reputation of being academically rigorous, or because they believe the opposite gender obstructs their child from a proper education. These views are the same as white individuals believing that allowing black individuals to use the same facilities as them decreases the effectiveness or value of the facilities. America should eliminate single gender schools because they give privileged students more opportunities, promote negative gender stereotypes, and segregate students causing others to be judge them by gender rather than character. To begin, the opposition argues that single gender schools increase learning productivity by removing learning distractions and pressure from the opposite gender. A two year project in six California public schools showed that, “single-gender classes actually exasperated teasing and disruptive behavior among boys and cattiness among girls” (Jost n.pag.).
Many kids with failing grades that really want to play a sport might cheat on tests or quizzes in class to bump up their grade since having an academic disadvantage, according to ir.stthomas.edu, “In this study, youths that experienced these types of sanctions withdrew from the sport, became bitter, and resented the actions of the coach but rarely mentioned any positive development from it. In fact, many mentioned the very opposite, such as learning to cheat the system or becoming distrusting of adults.” This shows that many kids are trying to cheat the system in school to pass; a majority of these kids are trying to cheat in many different ways in school to simply to pass a class just to play sports which is one of many reasons why we shouldn 't have a “No pass no play” rule. A survey from the Expert 21 states that “The Joseph Institute of Ethics conducted a survey on classroom cheating in 2006 and 2007. It was given to 5,275 high school students across the USA. The results show that 65 highschool students cheated .
Some deem others who do not wear the most fashionable clothes unpopular. In fact, according to the website Daily Mail, “children are so heavily influenced by brands that they bully or shun classmates who do not keep up with fashions and logos” (Clark). For example, in Heather Havrilesky’s essay “Bobos”, she discusses conflicts in school with fellow classmates treating her differently and ridiculing her because the shoes she normally bought were not the name brand shoes everyone else bought (Havrilesky 34). This is merely one example illustrating people being viewed differently and judged because of a misunderstanding of what normal is. In hopes to solve such problems, some schools even implemented school uniforms.
Does it mean random acts of kindness ? Or maybe a day where no one is being picked on or teased? These would both be the perfect examples of pink shirt day, however not all kids know the true mean, yes they have all heard the backstory, but they do not know the true meaning. Some kids do not realise those who do not come to class, not because they are sick, however because they cannot bring it upon themselves to go somewhere where they are named called, teased or pushed around. “Bully Proof Classroom: Confidential” shows those kids stories who could not come to class and because of that, they either failed a grade or their marks were not very high.
In coed schools, girls always attempt become what they feel others expect them to be, so girls quickly lose their own (Ogden, page 39). There are massages around girls all the time that will make girls lose themselves, such as “be sexy, but not sexual; be honest, but do not hurt anyone’s feelings; be independent, but be nice; be smart, but not so smart that you threaten boys” (Ogden, page 38). These massages will make girls become male’s attractive and simple targets, rather than become independent and ambitious leaders. Some studies indicate that girls at schools with single-sex programs achieve higher learning, display more self-confidence and leadership skills and enter male-dominated fields at a higher rate (Guarisco, page 6). All these skills that girls have learned in single-sex schools will lead them to have a higher career
There are so much more to learning than just grades. We should expand our school by adding and creating diversity among subjects and extracurricular activities in our school. These extracurricular activities are an essential part of a young student’s future transcript and résumé. Every child is
“Research shows that students in co-educational schools are often better prepared to succeed in post-secondary education and to enter the workforce, (Leighton).” It gives a positive self-image and helps develop the confidence of our future leaders, which students need. Students are preparing for the future and surprisingly, having both genders in the same teaching environment will actually help the students in the future. It makes them more confident when talking to the opposite sex, which students will need as they pursue their career as an adult. Students in single-sex classrooms will one day live and work side-by-side with members of the opposite sex. Educating students in single-sex schools limit their opportunity to work cooperatively and co-exist successfully with members of the opposite sex.
Rude children often get in quarrels with their mates and their teachers and they end up missing out on the important part of school- education. Without the help of parents, the words please, I’m sorry or thank you will be just another learnt lesson, without truly sending the right message or acquiring the true notion behind these words. Point 2 If children don’t respect their parents’ authority or word, how do we expect from them to show sympathy towards other children or show respect towards teachers and elderly people? This behavior should be expected both at school and home, without schools having to change the child from scratch and teach him/her of simple, basic manners. Point 3 It’s also clear that children don’t have their first meal at school or they also don’t learn how to clean after themselves.
Introduction Boys and girls grow and learn differently. “One is not better than the other -- they are just inherently different”(One classroom, one gender, boys and girls learn differently and thrive in single-sex classrooms, says education activist Betsy Perlman). So because of the differences between boys and girls, single sex education appeared to meet the needs of different learning styles of boys and girls. The definition of single-sex education made by U.S. Department of Education is “education at the elementary, secondary, or postsecondary level in which males or females attend school exclusively with members of their own sex”( Xiong). According to relevant research, there are more than 500 public schools in America offer single-sex
Through the stages of study boys and girls will interact more with each other. So they will more comfortable, and each of them will be respect the other. Also, teachers in mixed classes make all students participate and work together in groups. This method strengthens the relationship between students. Moreover, mixed schools will lead to competition.