A single sex setting can reduce distractions that are present once students reach adolescence. Just as coed schools are at a disadvantage, as they do not attend specifically to both boys and girls since they make use of a general approach to educating both genders. On the other hand, the single-sex schools put into perspective the specific gender needs when teaching; consequently, making the learning process
The essay has clearly argued that single-sex education is not good. Firstly, single-sex education does not mirror the realities of present day life where both men and women work and coexist in the same environment. If anything, single-sex education limits a student’s opportunity to work cooperatively and co-exist successfully with members of the opposite gender. Secondly, the argument that coed exposes students to distractions by the opposite gender does not hold since students now have access to the internet and social media where the distraction is even more devastating than sharing a class with a member of the opposite sex. Thirdly, it is common lore that the 21st century is one of equal resources and opportunities for both genders: if that is the case then single-sex education is reneging on this milestone and thus not good since it is reinforcing stereotypes and reopening avenues for one gender to be superior over the other.
Nowadays, public schools have the opportunity to open single sex classes. This topic is controversial. Many people believe that co-education is better and others think single sex education is better. Single sex education is more efficient as it prevents distraction, develop academic performance and improve social skills. Many parents argue that single
“Research shows that students in co-educational schools are often better prepared to succeed in post-secondary education and to enter the workforce, (Leighton).” It gives a positive self-image and helps develop the confidence of our future leaders, which students need. Students are preparing for the future and surprisingly, having both genders in the same teaching environment will actually help the students in the future. It makes them more confident when talking to the opposite sex, which students will need as they pursue their career as an adult. Students in single-sex classrooms will one day live and work side-by-side with members of the opposite sex. Educating students in single-sex schools limit their opportunity to work cooperatively and co-exist successfully with members of the opposite sex.
Second, it is argued that cost-benefit analysis contain a unadventurous bias because its Valuation principle, motivation to pay, depends upon ability to pay (i.e. wealth and income), Which is unequally disseminated? Again, the criticism is valid in theory but need not be so in put into practice. Weights may be assign to benefits which accrue to specific groups, if there is a clear and explicit policy good reason for doing so. Also merely display the incidence of (un weighted) costs and benefits will often provide useful indicators of the equity implications, in income distributional terms, of projects and programmes.
Teaching students that gender does not determine one’s ability to succeed in any particular field is also crucial for personal development. This can be seen in an article from Arizona State University: “Girls in coeducational schools have made impressive strides in all areas of math and science in recent decades, as gender stereotypes are declining among parents, teachers, and students themselves. Despite popular belief, there is little evidence that removing boys from the campus or classroom improves girls’ math and science skills” (ACCES, n.d., para. 21). Modern education has shown impressive results in the growth of females in predominantly-male fields.
In conclusion, there are two main advantages of single-sex education. One is single- sex education can help student achieve higher academic achievement. The other is single-sex education can offer students better academic environment. The disadvantages of single-sex education The students from single-sex schools do not get prepared enough as the students from coed schools in facing the real world, because they are not good at handle the relationships with opposite gender and they are hard to establish a complete gender role in single-sex environment. Firstly, children spend their “formative years in schools developing skills that will help them maintain relationships throughout their lives” (Blake).
Is single-sex education really that much better than co-ed schooling? Many don’t think so. Although having single-sex school would reduce interactions between each gender we should still have the mixture of boys and girls because it gives us an opportunity of making more friends, getting our academic levels higher, and maybe even getting a free education. Some people say that single-sex education students are smarter because they get a better education but that isn’t always the case. Schooling isn’t different in either type of school, besides having only one gender or both, it’s just the way you look at it.
Attending either single-sex or co-ed schools have always been a problem; whether it is the amount for the school or the debate on if the students should be around other genders. Parents say that by going to single-sex schools could help the student focus heavily on academics,however what the parents don’t realize is that by going to single-sex school doesn’t help prepare the student for the world. But by going to a co-ed school it gives the student the opportunity to get used to being around and interacting with other genders. Although single-sex education helps students focus heavily on academics, students should be aloud to mix with other genders because this helps with the student’s social skills, it's too expensive to get single-sex education and the student will struggle to adjust being around other genders when going to college or getting a job. Students should be aloud to mix with other genders because this helps with the
Perhaps no subject in the contemporary society as controversial as the matter of education. Some people think that the boy and girl students should be taught in separate schools, while others argue that the teaching boys and girls in mixed schools is better. From my point of view, I partly disagree with this idea as each type of school have merits and demerits and they are affected by factors such as traditions, customs, culture, society and religious beliefs of the people as well as the methods and social management policy of the government in each country. In the following essay, some reasons of two opposite opinions will be discussed in detail. On the one hand, people believe that boys and girls should study in a separate gender-based system based on some advantages.