Pros And Cons Of BOQ

719 Words3 Pages
6 Pros and Cons of BOQ

The pros and cons of the BOQ 's have been faced off regarding and thought upon for a long time now and the contention has produced some unequivocally held sentiments and numerous varying perspectives. BOQ has two essential uses in development; the first is the pre-contract phase of tendering and the second is at the post contract stage where it is utilized by the foreman and QS to esteem work and value varieties from the configuration. Preferences and disservices of BOQ is as per the following,


• Spare the expense and time of a few contactors measuring the same plan keeping in mind the end goal to ascertain their offers for rivalry.

• The valuing subtle elements inside the BOQ give an expense database to
…show more content…
7 Conclusion As a value engineering solution, Hybrid concrete technology will be used in this project given in the brief. Hybrid concrete technology is utilized principally to accomplish quick and financially savvy development by uprooting work escalated operations on site and supplanting them with automated creation in pre casting yards and processing plants. Possibly there are numerous different favourable circumstances as follows. C.H.Goodchild (2004)
Cost - Generally, cost is the most compelling factor in choosing construction materials. Despite the fact that the structure of a building speaks to regularly just 10% of development cost, the decision of construction material can have emotional consequences for the expense of different components of development. The subsequent basic expense of this method could be higher, however compared to the overall project cost of a conventional method, HCC would be much lower due to time saving and buildability of the structure.
…show more content…
HCC 's key quality is buildability. The way of HCC powers preplanning and the determination of development issues, for occurrence, just in times deliveries, so there won’t be any storage expenses. Furthermore crane snare time turn into a characteristic piece of the procedure. Brilliant completions can be most effectively delivered in industrial facility conditions in precast units. In-situ components and joints are imperative fundamentally yet should not attain to the same nature of completion thus can be escaped perspective. Where completions to in-situ components are needed, the amounts can be minimized. C.H.Goodchild (2004). Therefore to conclude, in-situ reinforced concrete is usually seen as the most monetary surrounding alternative, while precast cement advances speed and high quality. Therefore by joining the two by receiving crossover procedures gives considerably more noteworthy speed, quality and general

More about Pros And Cons Of BOQ

Open Document