The view of the people towards the decriminalization of drugs has drastically changed over the past few years. Yes, drugs change the chemicals in the brain by interfering with the process of which neurons send and receive signals. Yes, ingesting drugs can change a persons mood, emotion, as well as their perceptiveness. Therefore making it extremely difficult to quit once one has been using drugs for a significant period of time. The process of decriminalizing drugs would allow people to rather than spend their time behind bars for limited amounts of one substance, to receive the help of others and obtain access to rehabilitation. Although those in possession of a controlled substance should receive punishment, decriminalization would grant …show more content…
In “The Decriminalization Of Drugs | Here Are The Pros & Cons”, Northeast Addictions Treatment Center states that, “The decriminalization of drugs would remove criminal penalties for drug use and possession of equipment associated with drug use (such as needles and syringes) and low-level sales.” Northeast Addictions Treatment Center is acknowledging how the decriminalization of drugs is to be used and that it would only lower the number of incarcerations throughout the world. Further in their article, Northeast Addictions Treatment Center mentions that “In 2001, Portugal decriminalized all drug use but did not legalize it. Citizens who buy, possess, or use up to a ten days supply of illicit drugs are referred to substance abuse treatment programs instead of jails or prisons.” This is a sole example of how the world has proceeded cautiously when dealing with cases involving illicit drugs. However, instead of referring one in possession of illicit drugs to a jail or prison, they are referred to a rehabilitation center. As previously mentioned, allowing those to receive treatment rather than being locked up and entered into the justice system, has and will continue to better society and the view on those involved in the buying and selling of illegal …show more content…
In Kailash Chad’s article, “Head to Head: should drugs be decriminalized? Yes,” he mentions that, “decriminalization of heroin and other hard drugs has allowed addicts to be treated as patients” and “hardly any new heroin addicts are registered while existing users are supported and have been helped to get jobs.” Chad talks of how the decriminalization of certain drugs has allowed many people to be treated as patients and have been allowed to refrain from using drugs. He also mentions how former users have received help and have been granted the chance to achieve well-paying and competent jobs. While those receiving treatment due to the decriminalization of drugs are continuing to succeed in life, others who are still partaking in the practice of using drugs are driving themselves deeper into trouble and making it significantly more difficult to receive help and live the average life they may dream
After conducting some research I have reached the conclusion that drug offenders are the population in which could be more successfully controlled and rehabilitated in less secure correctional alternatives. There are a couple different beneficial aspects to transferring drug offenders out of prisons and into programs. The first is that is saves money while also being more effective. When you place an inmate into a program that is designed to help them with their specific problem your results improve. The Center for Substance Abuse Treatment’s final report on NTIES noted that “In summary, we observed a pattern of substantially reduced alcohol and drug use in every type of treatment modality, with reductions typically between one-third and two-thirds
Ruth Dreifuss, the former president of Switzerland, is an activist of preventing heroin throughout the world. Recently, she wrote an article in CNN fighting the heroin epidemic that plagues the U.S. Her tactic employs “Policies that are people-centered, focused on health and most importantly keeping people alive all while respecting human rights” (Dreifuss). Dreifuss’s tactic, which she used in Switzerland, is very similar to the ideas used by medical professionals, but there are some differences. Her tactics are also slightly controversial, utilizing “opiate substitution therapy” (Dreifuss).
Proponents of drug legalization, such as myself, argue that it could have a number of societal benefits. For one thing, it may help to reduce the number of weak addicts by making drugs more widely available and less valuable. As a result, employers would no longer have to worry about hiring people with drug addictions, potentially leading to a more competitive job market. Furthermore, legalization might contribute to economic growth by generating new jobs in the drug industry and money through taxes and regulations.
Randy E. Bartnett claims that “drug laws cause more harm to addicts and society than drugs themselves.” According to Bartnett, “Drug prohibition makes drugs so expensive, the addicts trying to crime in order to obtain money to buy them. Furthermore, drug prohibition is unfair in that it punishes users for committing a “crime” that has no victim.” Some people might agree with the idea that legalizing drugs would benefit addicts because then they would not be able to obtain drugs so easily.
The main issue when it comes to drugs in the United States is the inefficient policies and sentencing laws that have been created. Also, the injustices within these policies pertaining primarily to race. Once the “war on drugs” was claimed the only way the government and law enforcement saw fit to handling this skyrocketing issue was to incarcerate offenders. Although this solution worked for a while, other alternatives needed to be made. However, these alternatives were not made and this left the drug policies, sentencing laws, and injustices at a standstill.
The fight against drug use is not just an individual’s effort. Fighting drug use and stopping drug abusers requires a collective effort. State governments’ agencies, nonprofit organizations, health care providers and even friends and relatives must work to reduce the number of people willing to buy and use
Addison Hicks Ms. Duke CA III/W3 27 February 2023 American Punishment: Rehabilitation Substitutes Incarceration A person whose life falls victim to the ongoing problem of substance abuse dwindles down into the hands of the state, thus deciding an individual’s punishment. Each year, more than 20 million people suffer from the use of drugs. Whether these be cocaine, heroin, LSD, marijuana, methamphetamine, or nicotine. The majority of these offenders end up in places such as prisons, leading to the issue of overcrowding.
Only 18.3% (337,882) were for the sale or manufacture of a drug” (p. 23). Therefore, the individuals who are likely to enter the already overcrowded prisons may be users and the actual not distributors themselves. Thus, prison space that is intended to be reserved for murders and sexual predators is instead being occupied by substance
Many people believe that addicts should be in jail to pay for their criminal behavior, but this is the last thing that will aid them into becoming healthy and operational citizens. The addicts who are convicted of criminal charges should not be incarcerated while under the influence of drugs, as they focus primarily on penalizing and discipline; they should instead be sent into rehabilitation in order to prepare them to be functioning
But if the government wants to help drug addicts, they must not only provide drug addicts with medical services, but also provide them with housing and jobs that can sustain them. These methods are not only expensive, but may also affect the overall American society, because providing jobs for these people means that some normal people will lose their job
Today many countries try to regulate the numbers of drugs users as many as they can by using the scary promotions and commercials to attract the attention from people, albeit ineffective. Rather than using the outmoded methods, legitimacy should be announced for all drugs in order that the regulation will process more ease for the government. In this procedure, the government can legislate the limitations for drugs consumption and people will be able to understand drug disadvantages profoundly. Therefore, allowing drugs as ordinary substances will abate the drug consumption. The aforementioned issue, in brief, the drugs is a too danger to leave it as it is so it should be legalized.
The continuous use of narcotics results in addiction, and financial struggles due to the costly upkeep. “Financial problems are one of the major side effects of drug and substance abuse” (Buaggett, 2015). Addicts cannot adequately take an active role in the economic activities, as the use of drugs inhibits the abilities of the users to earn a daily living. Due to the instability of finances, this would result in selling personal belongings to continue funding the substance of choice, and depending on the addicts living situation, this could lead to losing their house or being removed from their current housing. While being under the influence, an addicts voice of reason is jeopardized, resulting in criminal activities which raise the chances of being apprehended by the law enforcers, as well as, heavy fines are imposed.
Upon reading Gore Vidals "Case for Legalizing Marijuana" one may wonder why drugs are not legal in the United States of America. Afterall, several valid reasonings were made throughout the article. There is a demand for drugs and many people are supplying them, while also making a small fortune. If drugs were made legal and sold for high prices, their market would decrease because many people would not be able to afford them. Most people involved in the drug world do not know the consequences of that which they consume.
Would the decriminalisation and / Legalisation of controlled substances improve or hinder the economic, health and social circumstances of drugs users, their families, communities and society? This essay will briefly outline the current policies on drugs in Ireland and will examine the policies and substance misuse from a European and international perspective; then it will discuss how decriminalisation of drugs and substances can improve or hinder the economic, health and social circumstances of drug users, their families, communities and society in general. Examples of controlled substances in Ireland include cocaine, heroin, methadone, cannabis (full list of controlled substances found in the schedule Misuse of Drugs Act 1977).
As of recent, the war on drugs has been a very often discussed topic due to many controversial issues. Some people believe the War on Drugs has been quite successful due to the amount of drugs seized and the amount of drug kingpins arrested. I believe this to be the wrong mindset when it comes to the war on drugs. The war on drugs isn’t a winnable one so we must do all that is possible to assist those who struggle with drug addiction and decriminalize small amounts of drugs. These minor changes in the way we combat drugs will create significant change and have lasting effects.