Currently, opinions are arising on the social issue of embryonic stem cell research and if this research is beneficial. Embryonic stem cell research uses the living cells of embryos to treat life-threatening illnesses.(Harvard Stem Cell Institute, 2008) There are three types of cell lines specialized physicians remove the designated stem cells from: existing cells, modified cells, and lab-created cells. (Right to Life of Michigan, 2016) The side of controversy that strikes the most uprise is the conservative party. The views of conservative individuals such as George W. Bush can greatly sway the public opinion. In 2008, previous President George W. Bush vetoed a stem cell bill that wanted to initiate research on embryos. Former President …show more content…
The major replacement of taking embryonic stem cells is sacrificing already developed adult stem cells.(Right to Life of Michigan, 2016) The stem cells of adults can be easily conformed to the selected research requirements. Abnormalities in adult stem cells are less likely than embryonic stem cells to regenerate in the research being performed.(Stem Cell Controversy,2016) Another option is an altered nuclear transfer (ANT); which an embryo is not created and any other cell except for the egg cell can be genetically altered and transferred back into the female egg.(Stem Cell Controversy, 2016)This activity does not require harming an actual human embryo for the means of the medical research. Additionally, a blastomere extraction can be accomplished on the fertilized egg at two days old; in which, the mundane embryo endures division between the cell and egg eliminating full devastation. (Stem Cell Controversy, 2016) A rare choice for research technicians to obtain the stem cells necessary for their research can include a visit to a private cord blood bank. The umbilical cord blood at these specified facilities are infused with a large amount of stem cells. (Right to Life of Michigan, 2016) The clinic supplied stem cells in the umbilical cord blood is a safer derivative than withdrawing the cells from the human embryo. For parents who selected the method of in vitro fertilization to expand their family, the couple can settle on having the leftover eggs frozen for in the future endeavors instead of subjecting the fertile eggs to the methods of embryonic stem cell research.(Right to Life of Michigan, 2016) Also, the in vitro fertilization spare eggs can be adopted by another family that wishes to create a child, but are unable to reproduce
According to Smiths article researchers call the embryonic stem cells "spare and leftover"(Smith 24). So meaning the embryo is worthless. Smith strongly disagrees and says the use
This amendment declared that no government funding would go towards anything that results in or could cause the destruction of embryos. A few years later, President Clinton asked the NBAC (National Bioethics Advisory Commission) to create an overview of stem cell research as well as an overall opinion on the morality. After discussing, the NBAC declared public support for the research and also advocated for researchers’ ability to use cell lines from embryos left over from infertility
For these reasons, embryonic stem cell research should be discouraged. According to the National Institutes of
Ian Kerridge and Ronald Fung in "Uncertain Translation, Uncertain Benefit And Uncertain Risk: Ethical Challenges Facing First-In-Human Trials Of Induced Pluripotent Stem (Ips) Cells" talk about the discovery of “induced pluripotent stem (iPS)” in 2006 and its application in cell replacement therapy, and how it changed the debate on the ethics stem cell. In the article Ian and Ronald explain how iPS is different from the regular stem cell, and how it changes the debate of ethics in this matter. The problems with the ethics and stem cells are the experiments, and use of embryos, and ova taken from women and do research with it. Although the iPS is one alternative to the stem cell research, are different from the normal human stem cells. In conclusion
Research incorporates a wide variety of ethical dilemmas which divides a fine line between right and wrong opinions. Similar to the constant battle between church and science, democrats and republicans, pro-choice and pro-life each are at a stand-off of opposing ethical and moral opinions. There are many issues centered on non-profit organizations selling fetal tissue for research, such as Planned Parenthood which has been front page news as of late. Recent video and indications concerning fetal tissue donation and sales has placed Planned Parenthood in a highly questionable position concerning ethical and moral rights and wrongs.
Embryonic Stem cell research is a controversial issue in America right now and has been for years. Personally when I first saw read about this topic I knew I was going to be against it because of my religious beliefs. However, after doing more research and reading more into it, I actually think we need to continue funding for this. I know many people would disagree with me but this could save millions of people from suffering every day.
People who want to protect the lives of infants say we should not practice embryonic stem research on embryos because they believe it is unethical and they care about the lives of children. Since their beliefs and values differ from those of the religious beliefs and philosophical thinkers, they tend to have different reasons, and they tend to cite different evidence in support of their claim. For example, in “embryonic stem cell debate brings politics ethics to bench” Charles Marwick argues a principal claim in stark contrast to the position held by Glick. Whereas Glick said, “embryonic stem cell is ethical,” Marwick replies, “that embryonic stem cell is unethical.” And Marwick further supports his her principal claim with reasons that reflect his values and beliefs.
Embryonic stem cell research is an exciting area of regenerative medicine because of the probability of enormous potential for finding treatments and cures for debilitating diseases, disabilities, and cancers. The possibilities to learn and understand human growth from researching stem cells could lead toward a future where human suffering is all but eliminated [1]. The reasons that embryonic stem cells are more favorable than any other source of stem cells is because alternative stem cell lines are shorter-lived and do not have the same level of pluripotency. From a utilitarian perspective, the morally favorable option is to use embryonic stem cells from embryos since they are not equivalent to a fully formed human being, stem cells are taken
It is not uncommon for an embryo to simply not develop and become a fetus. Many times the embryo will simply never develop. If a study could be done testing the success rate of stem cell therapies using embryonic stem cells against the percentage of embryos that actually come to be born it might help some to determine. Whichever side has the higher percentage of success in that particular type of case should be the deciding factor for if embryonic stem cells should be used. People argue that it is murder to destroy the embryo to obtain stem cells, but to condemn someone with a terminal illness to death even though there may be a stem cell therapy that could save them should also be considered murder.
Stem cell controversy first started to arise in 1998 when scientists started removing stem cells from human embryos. Some individuals were excited that stem cells had the potential to cure a plethora of diseases. Others wondered if it was morally right to destroy human embryos. This controversy lead to political leaders debating on whether or not stem cell research should receive funding or
“Medical miracles do not happen simply by accident. They result from painstaking and costly research – from years of lonely trial and error, much of which never bears fruit – and from a government willing to support that work…” -Barack Obama. Stem cell research has been harsly debated due to ethical and religious views; and for good reason. Stem cells have the remarkable potential to develop into many different cell types in the body during early life and growth. In addition, in many tissues they serve as a sort of internal repair system, dividing essentially without limit to replenish other cells as long as the person or animal is still alive.
yet it’s there.” Stem Cell causes numerous consequences for, it was not reliable and this should undertake deeper studies on the other hand this was the only hope for the person suffering from diseases. We should thank God for the life we have. All of us have a special purpose, it is to live and do God’s will. People were God’s creation all of us were obliged to love one another not to hurt others especially the embryos inside the mother’s
The controversy of stem cells originates from where they are obtained, human embryos. The idea of killing human embryos sparked the global debate on when human life begins. In 2001, President Bush limited federal funding of stem cell research, deeming it unethical
From stem cell research, human organs could be grown in a laboratory and then be used to help treat certain illnesses. Stem cells are used as a learning tool to assist scientists to learn about the matter of cell development as well as human growth. Scientists use stem cells to indicate whether a medicine is safe enough for humans without human or animal’s testers. Stem cell research has the potential to hold the key to overturn the aging effects and extending human lives. This therefore isn’t acceptable in religious matter, especially in Christianity.
Many questions arise when discussing such controversial issues (Jaenisch et al.). Some of these questions include "the central, apparently unresolvable issue of the moral status of the human embryo, which raises questions about which perspectives should govern appropriate pluralistic policy" (Jaenisch et al.). There are also questions as to how to weigh the "possible scientific breakthroughs" with the "less quantifiable values and perspectives" (Jaenisch et al.). While there are decent arguments on how the copying of a human being could be