Pros And Cons Of Expectancy Theory

947 Words4 Pages
The Expectancy theory expresses that representative's inspiration is a result of how much an individual needs a reward (Valence), the evaluation that the probability that the exertion will prompt expected performance(Expectancy) and the conviction that the execution will prompt prize (Instrumentality). To put it plainly, Valence is the criticalness related by a person about the normal result. It is a normal and not the genuine fulfillment that a representative hopes to get in the wake of accomplishing the objectives. Expectancy is the confidence that better endeavors will bring about better execution. Anticipation is impacted by elements, for example, ownership of suitable aptitudes for performing the employment, accessibility of right assets,…show more content…
•This theory stresses upon the desires and observation; what is genuine and real is insignificant.

•It accentuates on prizes or pay-offs.

•It concentrates on mental lavishness where last target of individual is to accomplish greatest joy and least pain
Limitations of the Expectancy Theory
•The expectancy theory is by all accounts hopeful on the grounds that very much a couple of people see high degree relationship between execution and prizes.

•The use of this theory is constrained as prize is not specifically connected with performance in numerous associations. It is identified with different parameters likewise, for example, position, exertion, obligation, education, and so on.
Implications of the Expectancy Theory The managers can correlate the preferred outcomes to the aimed performance levels. The managers must ensure that the employees can achieve the aimed performance levels. The deserving employees must be rewarded for their exceptional performance. The reward system must be fair and just in an organization. Organizations must design interesting, dynamic and challenging
…show more content…
Ms Hogan did not check in a detailed manner regarding the employees’ motivation levels.
Reinforcement theory
BF Skinner and his partners proposed fortification hypothesis of inspiration. It expresses that singular's conduct is an element of its outcomes. It is taking into account "law of effect", i.e., singular's conduct with positive outcomes has a tendency to be rehashed, however singular's conduct with negative results tends not to be rehashed.

Fortification theory of inspiration neglects the interior condition of individual, Skinner overlooks i.e., the inward sentiments and drives of people and this was the problem with Ms. Hogan’s actions as well. This hypothesis concentrates absolutely on what happens to a person when he makes some move. Hence, as per Skinner, the outer environment of the association must be outlined successfully and decidedly in order to inspire the representative. This theory is an in number apparatus for breaking down controlling component for individual's conduct. Then again, it doesn't concentrate on the reasons for individual's
Open Document