ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Factions

781 Words4 Pages

According to The Federalist, there are few methods to go about the issues of factions. In The Federalist, No.10, the pros and cons of the Union are listed; along with some of the adjectives are instability, injustice, and confusion.The main cause is the factions. The factions are are numbers of citizens that amount to either a majority or minority of the whole who are united and actuated by a common impulse of any sort.The methods for curing the mischiefs, the methods for removing the causes of factions are listed in The Federalist, No. 10. The methods for curing the mischiefs of the faction are removing its causes and controlling the effects.There are two other two methods for removing the causes of factions. The first method is destroying liberty. The second method is giving every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests. The issue of ridding of freedom would be worse than having factions. Liberty is essential to the faction’s existence.Liberty is also essential to political life which is essential to faction life, which benefits animal life. The causes of factions are man made. …show more content…

Having a republican government benefits better than the democratic government because of the delegation of the government and the greater number of citizens and greater sphere of country over. Having delegations of the government on one hand, refines and enlarges the public views by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens. Those citizens having wisdom my best discern their true interest of their country and those who have true patriotism and love of justice will be least to sacrifice to temporary and partial considerations. Although the effect may be inverted. People in factions may first obtain the sufferages and then betray the interests of people, if the people are of temper,of local prejudices, or of sinister design by intrigue or

Show More
Related

  • Studied Criticisms Of James Madison's Federalist 10

    343 Words  | 2 Pages

    James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

    Read More

  • Federalist 10 By James Madison Summary Chapter 10

    512 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, this is impossible because the bases that factions lie upon are the same bases that a democratic government lie upon. Madison remarks, “Liberty is to faction what air is to fire, an aliment without which it instantly expires.” He says the two ways to remove factions are by destroying liberty or by giving everyone the same passions and interests. Impossible

    Read More

  • Federalist 10 Summary

    612 Words  | 3 Pages

    He then goes on to offer two strategies to combat an abusive majority, to prevent the formation of factions or to limit the effects of factional disputes.

    Read More

  • Federalist 10 Dbq

    243 Words  | 1 Pages

    Perhaps the most famous Federalist paper, Federalist 10, starts off by saying that one of the biggest arguments that favors the Constitution is that it creates a government suited to minimize the harm caused by factions. Faction, in this case, is defined as a group of people whether a minority or majority based on class, race, and profession that all share a common interest. It was inevitable that factions would occur and perhaps the defining characteristic was the unequal distribution of property. This would ultimately lead the poor without property to become the majority in a “tyranny of the masses.” Madison believed that there were two solutions in preventing majority factions, 1) Remover the causes, and 2) Control the effects.

    Read More

  • Federalist 10 Madison's Three Compromises

    403 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout Federalist 10 Madison addresses the issue of political factions, or parties, and how they are a problem, and how to deal with them. Madison describes factions as like minded people who come together to impose their views on others. The first method Madison proposes is to remove the causes that make the faction, and the second being by controlling its effects. In order to do those things Madison says that we must destroy liberty, and give everyone the same opinions, passions and the interests respectfully. Neither of these ideas would work however because if you destroy liberty just because it gives rise to factions, you would be destroying something that is good just because it has a small side effect that can be seen as

    Read More

  • Note On Speeches Debating The Consitution From The NY Ratification Convention

    846 Words  | 4 Pages

    Both of the factions had hugely different ideals from one another with the Federalist's ideal that having a centralized government was important for the stability

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Federalist No. 10 James Madison

    944 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the Federalist no. 10 James Madison argues that the iniquity of the government by the people is its exposure to the issue caused by factions. Madison defines factions as any group of people that share the same views and opinions. These factions often assemble together causing violence and damage to secure personal economic investments and enforce their political views. Madison’s main concern with factions is that one might reduce the rights of another or effect the good of the whole in order to protect their own self-interest. When given the freedom to do so, these personal interest are usually at the price of another group.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Federalists

    1203 Words  | 5 Pages

    “The Federalist,” written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison under the surname ‘Publius,’ attempts to convince the American people that a republican government would be beneficial to both the people and the United States as a whole. Since ‘Publius’ is, in actuality, three different people, one would expect to find some discrepancies between authors. However, in analyzing “The Federalist,” Madison and Hamilton present a unified front – in order to control the effects of factions, they agree that a government should be able to protect its constituents from their misguided passions, that virtual representation is necessary, and that checks and balances among the divided powers of the government are vital. Factions are a source

    Read More

  • The Federalist No. 10 Argument

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    Madison is analyzing the way to deal with the growing faction problem. He begins his essay by defining factions for the reader. “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of

    Read More

  • Federalist No. 10 Essay

    1074 Words  | 5 Pages

    10 shows the dangers a total democracy can create and how harmful “factions” can be. James Madison defined factions as: By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community. (Federalist No. 10) It showed the benefits of republic versus a democracy, displaying that with such a large country with so many citizens and varying opinions that an elected official chosen by the people were best to make decisions within the government. All things considered, Federalist No. 10 was important to show the people the great differences in both types of government and help persuade people in ratification.

    Read More

  • Supreme Courts Dbq

    1112 Words  | 5 Pages

    Thus causing even more conflict, especially amongst those not in the South. Another controversial issue was federalism because Marshall gave the national government a vast amount of power over state 's rights, and Taney believed more in giving power to the state rather than the national government. In addition, this is when outside groups started forming and lobbying their influence over government decisions, whether it is pertaining to slavery, rights, or economic interests. James Madison regarded “factions” or interest groups with concern when authoring segments of the Federalist Papers. The problem he envisioned was that eliminating them from the political scene was a threat to democratic principles, a cure worse than the disease.

    Read More

  • Factions And Federalist Essay No. 10

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    It states, “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” In simpler terms a faction is another term for an interest group, a group of people with a common interest, such as a political

    Read More

  • Madison's Views On Faction Summary

    501 Words  | 3 Pages

    1.) What does Madison mean by the term “Faction”? What is a modern term we would use today? Madison uses the term faction to refer to groups of individuals arguing not for the rights or good of the community as a whole, but rather that which would benefit those who hold similar positions or interests. Different factions represent different ideas, leading to conflict and debate.

    Read More

  • Brief Summary Of 'Five Factions' Chapters, Questions And Answers

    1552 Words  | 7 Pages

    The purpose of the five factions is the following: Amity are farmers and counselors, Erudite teachers, Abnegation runs the government, Candor handles the law, and Dauntless are in charge of the city's security. The personality types of factions are Dauntless (the brave), Amity (the peaceful), Erudite (the intelligent), Abnegation (the selfless), and Candor (the honest). No, I do not think that these factions represent every basic personality type and fulfill all the basic needs of people. There are too many other factions that would be needed to fill in the gaps that are needed. Everybody is different, so in all technicality there would need to be hundreds of factions (and maybe even so sub-factions).

    Read More

  • Federalist 10 Pros And Cons

    968 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout Federalist 10, Madison warned his audience of the dangers of factions. Madison believed that as long as people espoused differing opinions, came from different backgrounds, and especially, as long as there was an unequal distribution of property, people would form factions with like-minded individuals whose ideologies they shared. This grouping of people of America, in his opinion, would lead to great violence in the country that could harm the nation’s wellbeing. In order to remedy this problem, in which he viewed unequal distribution of property as the main culprit, Madison decided that setting up a Republic which would be composed of only the most qualified candidates and would be composed of a multitude of factions would be

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Factions

Open Document