Fossil fuels are a nonrenewable resource, yet we are heavily reliant on it to as our main source of fuel for transportation and powering of machinery. As it is a nonrenewable resource once we us up deposits we are able to reach, we will no longer be able to access remaining deposits, if there are any. Not only will we eventually run out, our increasing dependence on fossil fuels is in turn increasing our greenhouse gas emissions and hurting our environment. In this situation, the pros of investing into research largely outweigh the cons of not doing so. The government should invest in researching and developing renewable energy. First and most importantly, fossil fuels are a nonrenewable resource that we are using up very quickly. There must
In addition, we depend on oil and natural gas for energy to drive our cars, heat our houses, provide air
This argument is supported by a list of examples showing the negative effects of the fossil fuel burned for oil demand. For example, “sea level rise, global temperature, and ocean acidification” (Hart, 26). This list of information is cited from NASA, and Hart invites the reader to further look at NASA’s research. This shows he gets his information from a government funded research base, and provides further information for the reader. He then further discusses the affect burning fossil fuel has on global warming.
The main way that oil and natural gas reserves are acquired are through the means of Fracking. Also known as hydrofracking, this method utilizes a drill that drills down thousands of feet underground, which is then flushed with millions of gallons of water along with additive chemicals at high pressures to break the rocks sheltering the reserves. This method of attainment is quite risky as it comes with many unfavorable consequences that are quite unbeneficial. Like fossil fuel plants, fracking also releases greenhouse gasses like methane(Potential Health and Environmental Effects of Hydrofracking in the Williston Basin, Montana), which is worse than carbon dioxide and causes air pollution. Alongside that, pollutants like Benzene and Xylene also leak out during the fracking process, which is known to cause serious health conditions and even death in some cases due to the long exposure to the pollutants(Potential Health and
Coal mining in the U.S. provides many jobs and is the backbone of many incomes. Longwall coal mining is one form of underground coal mining. In fact, it is the most productive form, yet the safest. The machine used is highly powerful and efficient. Pros for this type of mining are followed by cons as well.
The Oil Sands - The Way to Go or Time to Say No? The Oil Sands are a large source of energy in Canada which meet large demands for energy. Alysa Encarnacion, Editorial Writer May 14, 2017 ATHABASCA — The Oil Sands are the “heart” of Canada’s economy, rewarding us with 1.7 trillion dollars. There are both benefits and cons to the Oil Sands, affecting Canada economically, socially, politically, and environmentally. The Oil Sands have contributed $91 billion to Canada’s GDP.
Fossil Fuels have been used as a fuel since the start of the Industrial Revolution. In 1790 the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere increased because of this. These gases will remain there for over hundreds of years. I will take centuries for the natural processes to bring down the levels of the green house gases to a normal level. Because of this their warming influence will remain on our Earth for the coming Century
The alternatives available at the moment are certainly unsatisfactory in many regards, nor are they well understood. So the issue is of high priority. Amy Jaffe also mentions that we are lowering the harm to the environment by ‘diversifying away from coal’. But ‘diversifying away’ implies alternatives, and she doesn’t provide any other than fracking. I intend to further research why countries like France banned fracking.
Imagine a world where we have used up all of our nonrenewable resources and no longer have gas to power our cars, no coal to make energy, and no natural gas to power you household items. Well it might not be too hard to imagine, because it is predicted that in less than 75 years we will use up all of our natural gas, oil, and coal deposits. This is just one of many reasons that the government needs to put more funding into green energy. They not only need funding to find new sources of renewable energy but they also need to invest more in products that produce clean energy like solar panels, windmills, and turbines in dams. Climate change has been a center of attention for many years now, however it seems that very few changes have been made to slow or stop it.
If we switch over to all electric engines, the gas industry will have a drastic decline in business and could possibly go out of business. Gas stations make it easy to just fill up and go more miles, while electric needs time to fill up, and also needs special electric service requirements of 220 volt plugs sometimes and higher amperages to charge the vehicle. Gas stations also provide a place to buy food for the road. I believe that gasoline engines overpower electric for many reasons, mostly because electric is les reliable than
They cannot replenish fast enough, they destroy animal shelters and kill different animals, and they lead to serious health issues for humans like decreasing brain activity or cancer. For this reason, scientists are researching better solutions and so far they have found renewable rescores. These energies are reproducing faster than they are being taken away, they don’t harm animals as much as fossil fuels, they benefit humans, and contrary to popular belief, they can be made maintainable. As Barack Obama believes, “To truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of
Angel Hsu A block Solar Energy 12/22/2015 “Because we are now running out of gas and oil, we must prepare quickly for a third change, to strict conservation and to the use of coal and permanent renewable energy resources, like solar power. ”(Jimmy Carter, televised speech,1977) Just like what he said, we should develop other energy than fossil fuel because we will run out of it some days and fossil fuels are the main reason of global climate change.
It is commonly known throughout human history that the energy used is burned from coal which creates biomass. During the Industrial Revolution, coal was an essential need to everyone, hence the discovery of oil as a substitute. Yet, the mass formation from the unearthing of oil causes more damage than benefits for the planet. Humanity had never seen a more compatible source in which came a higher demand for oil. As the public has urged to generate more oil, scientists theorized that fossil fuels will eventually run out, making way for a renewable energy route in the future (Mason).
Fossil fuels Fossil fuels are NOT a renewable energy resource it will finish up one day As once we 've burned them all, there isn 't any more, and our consumption of fossil fuels has nearly doubled every 20 years since 1900. This is a particular problem for Oil, because we also use it to make plastics and many other products Coal, Oil and Gas are called "fossil fuels" because they have been formed from the fossilized remains of prehistoric plants and animals.
Should we pursue alternate energy sources? I feel that we should pursue alternate energy sources. It would stop pollution and global warming from happening so sudden, as we have it currently in our generation. Using renewable energy means that we will never run out of the energy we need.
this damage will have devastating consequences for future human generations all other life of earth yet we continue to use fossil fuels. This is for a few reasons, firstly we are so reliant of them that it will be impossible to completely change to renewables overnight . fossil fuels are still the cheapest form of energy available so why would individual people and business chose otherwise to put money into renewable research,, well governments around world have realised the danger of global warming and they know an overnight switch is impossible so the have implemented taxes on fossil fuels and inefficient use of them and put this money into renewable energy research, also provided grants and tax breaks for people and business that are switching to renewables. these actions will slowly make renewable energy more cost effective and appealing to everyone and will move the world away from fossil fuels and towards renewable green energy sources. Similarly with stem cell research i think the potential medical benefits of mastering stem cell therapies is just too big.