When reading this statistics you believe that the Catholic Church is against the process of human evolution, but in all actuality they accept it. The amount of tension was not necessarily lightened in 1950 when Pope Pius XII made a papal encyclical called Humani Generis. It basically stated that he wants the thought of evolution to just be a scientific fad and he goes on to attack those people who do believe evolution is true. One thing he could do was coincide with the idea of evolution as long as people realized the soul was something that only God could do. In 1996 Pope John Paul II made a papal encyclical as well, but it was called Fides et Ratio.
People in nowadays are still arguing about the technology of Genetic engineering, but is Genetic engineering really a good thing? Should we go for it or against it? In my opinion, I am against human genetic engineering and there are some following reasons, even it sometimes help people. What are the advantages of Genetic engineering? First, Genetic engineering ends disease, which is the most conductive thing that helps people, in many ways.
As technology advances, more things become possible. One of these things is genetically modifying a baby, this is very wrong. Genetic modifying or genetic engineering is altering someone or something’s DNA. Scientists hope to cure diseases with this method but doing this can lead to some harmful effects. This process is very unethical.
Human cloning is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human. The idea of human cloning is becoming a reality and it is no longer mere science fiction. As this idea turns into reality, it is leaving many people horrified, but it’s helping scientists find cures for many diseases. Although human cloning can create a new doorway for scientists, it has dangerous implications to humans and nature. Although human cloning has dangerous implications to humans and nature, adverse opinions exist.
Is it because technology is not advanced enough yet? Or is it just because human cloning might be too dangerous? Many scientists are trying to clone humans but is it ever justified? There are a whole lot of debates on this topic, and I am strongly against it. Human cloning is ethically wrong; there are many risks involved, which will lead to detrimental effects on human society.
Many people believe that scientists should develop a clone human but government are against human cloning. Cloning has several of prejudice. For example, expanded danger of acquired infections comes from the way that all clones have the same qualities and in this manner may be helpless to a specific kind of sickness. This may result in one sickness wiping out a whole population. Another inconvenience is absence of quality variety.
The initially cloned animal was a sheep named Dolly. Improvement of twins from a solitary fertilized egg and agamic generation in specific animals are occurrences of animal cloning. Presently, it is even conceivable to falsely reproduce the procedure of animal cloning because of the headway and huge advancement made by natural technology throughout the years (Hein & Griebel, 2003). Endeavors to clone animals were on since a genuinely long time. Nonetheless, a considerable lot of the introductory endeavors were unsuccessful and brought about nothing.
We have technology that can examine the DNA of humans and compare it to DNA from other living organisms. Darwin’s theory is that humans are the result of evolution from the ape. With the world ever developing , the theory is that the ape developed into a Neanderthal and the finally into a human. This theory may be believable, as according to Dr. Nolan in Greer’s article “Neanderthals are 99.5% genetically identical to humans, and chimps and apes are 96-97% identical” – this shows that there are similarities between humans and both Neanderthals and apes , however the majority of people disagree with this theory as they say there is too much of a difference. This is what people feel when the statistics show similarity of a minimum of 96% similar.
These people strongly believe that animals also carry rights like humans and it’s against the rights to change their DNA and genetically modify it for human use. Lastly, the people also strongly disagree with the fact that hundreds of these animals are used for clinical trial research and transgenic animals are not unlike. 2. They can be unsafe for human consumption: - The safety for the products produced by transgenic animal is no guarantee. This is true because not all experiments on transgenic animals are effective.
It has a huge element of uncertainly. For example, the cloning of Dolly was the success of one egg of 277 eggs. Therefore, there are no absolutely correct ways of telling the social, mental and medical consequences of cloning. New and more aggressive diseases can arise from cell mutations during cloning. Cloning also results in a loss of diversity in genes.