ipl-logo

Human Cloning: A Dangerous Invention

1144 Words5 Pages

HUMAN CLONING-A Dangerous Invention

Cloning is an advance technological invention for producing a genetic twin of living things, an organism that starts life with the same gene as its parent. The main phenomenon taking place behind this process is in mammal, DNA is taken from adult animal and then it is inserted into an egg cell from another animal. This egg then divides into an embryo. The embryo is then transported into a surrogate mother and grown to term. It is of two types:
1) Non-reproductive: such as DNA research; research on human reproduction and infertility; research on aging and on cogenesis; possible production of cloned human tissues and organs to be used in medical experiments and organ transplant.
2) Reproductive: producing …show more content…

This experiment has only 5% chance to get success. So the first argument against human cloning is straightforward and widely shared: it is dangerous. Here genetic screening is used with cloned human embryos and any embryo that does not pass will be killed. So the opponents of human cloning say that an embryo at any stage of development is a human life, worthy of protection and any kind of research that entails destroying an embryo is immoral, unethical, no matter how worthy the intent may be. It involves using human beings as means; it turns human into commodities and fosters a culture of …show more content…

In this film it was showed, how a man cloned his DNA with various other animals and as a result he was successful in creating new animals having some extra ordinary features which is done by the process of cloning. So, if it will continue then people will someday become animals too. Yes, it has various advantages like it provides treatment against spinal injuries, heart diseases and other things also. But it is not that much worthy.
Like a coin, cloning has its two sides. Human cloning also has its two aspects. But it has more negative aspects than positive aspects. Like in this film, a man cloned various animals and used them for destruction purposes. Likewise, scientist have also started talking about designer baby, which made it theoretically possible to have a engineer child genetically with added height, intelligence and even removing defective gene or disabilities such as alcoholism, cystic

Show More
Related

  • The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks By Rebecca Skloot

    2906 Words  | 12 Pages

    There is the chance that cloning may be able to better how humans live. “ Will it produce more good than harm or vice versa? This is true of cloning as well. Cloning is by no means the first technology that has been widely debated. It is, however, among the first to be so controversial before it is even possible to achieve.

    Read More

  • Playing God Analysis

    804 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animal cloning has been the subject of various scientific experiments for years but only gained little attention until the birth of the very first cloned mammal in 1996, a sheep named Dolly. Since then, scientists have began to clone other animals like cows and mice. The recent success in cloning animals has sparked fierce debates among politicians, scientists, and the general public about the use, morality and ethnicity of cloning animals, plants and possibly

    Read More

  • Summary Of Steven Pinker's Defense Of Dangerous Ideas

    1048 Words  | 5 Pages

    While, cloning is taking the same DNA and replicating it to make an identical copy of that same DNA. Although many people may think genetic enhancement and cloning is a dangerous idea and corrodes the prevailing moral order because it goes against religious beliefs, the advancements may go too far, and there are risk factors. Genetic enhancement and cloning is a good impact on society because it helps food supply, cures inherited diseases, solves infertility, and there is a potential to live longer. Imagine a world without diseases, infertility, and bad genes, that is what genetic enhancement

    Read More

  • The Dangers Of Cloning In Frankenstein

    703 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dangers of Playing God and Human Cloning In Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein plays god and it costs him dearly. The cloning of humans would inevitably include controlling of human life, with dangers such as genetic abnormalities, and possible issues with human rights or societal views. When Victor makes his creation, he does not consider possible problems he might be causing for his creation. Victor’s creation suffers for all of the reasons listed to why human cloning can be dangerous.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein Pros And Cons Of Cloning

    846 Words  | 4 Pages

    It will only drain wealth out of an economy” (Rawat). Reproducing a human being or an animal the normal way is free. It takes no hit on the economy and comes with little to no uncertain results except for the gender of the offspring. Cloning is risky and the money spent on research is being spent on something that will never be completely successful. It is a complete waste of not only money but also

    Read More

  • Frankenstein And The Birthmark Analysis

    1325 Words  | 6 Pages

    Many believe cloning is a perversion of science, and some are even concerned with a real life Frankenstein situation: “Reproductive cloning… could lead to a Dr. Frankenstein’s vision of lab manufactured humans. To me this is a perversion of science” (Ford 1). Furthermore, in Frankenstein, Dr. Frankenstein detached from the world as he became obsessed with his studies, diminishing his health. A similar thing could happen to scientists who clone if they decide that they are “playing god,” which can be dangerous for the scientists and the clones. Cloning is so controversial and causes an overbearing amount of stress for it to be befitting to the human mind, as Victor Frankenstein puts it, “If the study to which you apply yourself has a tendency to weaken your affections, and to destroy… those simple pleasures in which no alloy can possibly mix, then that study is certainly unlawful… not befitting of the human minds” (Shelley 50).

    Read More

  • Misuse Of Knowledge In Frankenstein

    389 Words  | 2 Pages

    I believe human cloning interferes with nature in ways humanity will not be able to handle. This source states, " This could lead to a set of problems that we have no ability to handle. " The evidence suggests that human cloning can lead to the fall of humanity, due to clones becoming soverienty. However, some people believe that human cloning can be useful, due to assisting with unlawful interests. I beleive that this will only create misuse of knowledge in trying to correct clones in right paths.

    Read More

  • The Ethics Of Cloning In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    557 Words  | 3 Pages

    James Joyce once said that “mistakes are the portals of discovery.” However, when it comes to the field of genetic engineering, specifically cloning, mistakes, or even discoveries, could turn out to be disastrous. Victor Frankenstein found this out when, in the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, he discovers the secrets to creating life which, some might say, led to a horrifying 8 foot tall creature. Nonetheless, cloning has become a lucrative field in the past twenty years since the first sheep was cloned. The process of cloning is essentially extracting tissue from an organism and growing the tissue within a laboratory by means of asexual reproduction.

    Read More

  • Cloning In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    1001 Words  | 5 Pages

    The benefits of cloning in the world far outweigh any of the consequences. Opportunities for cloning to save lives exists everywhere, whether it be in saving an existing life and in the process creating a new life. Science should disregard Victor Frankenstein’s advice of “(seeking) happiness in tranquility and avoid ambition, even if it be only the apparently innocent one of distinguishing yourself in science and discoveries” (Shelley 162), and instead continue to further their research and continue publishing an advocating the use and benefits of

    Read More

  • Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Cloning

    1084 Words  | 5 Pages

    Cloning at the gene level is acceptable and is done extensively in research areas. However, therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning raises skepticism and debate both in the general society and the scientific community. Among the argument raised is the possibility of cloning human beings; whether the individuals derived are seen as a complete human with the whole set of human rights attached to them. Body >>> Scientific Advantage <<< 2 PAR Fiester (2005) states that most of the animal cloning projects are driven by the goal of meeting human needs such as treatment of diseases, food production, and entertainment. However, there are animal cloning projects aimed at conserving endangered or

    Read More

  • Cloning Persuasive Speech

    988 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many scientists are trying to clone humans but is it ever justified? There are a whole lot of debates on this topic, and I am strongly against it. Human cloning is ethically wrong; there are many risks involved, which will lead to detrimental effects on human society. Before going into my points, I would like to talk about what cloning is. According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, cloning is “a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity.”

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning

    731 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many issues with regard to cloning humans. The main argument with cloning human beings is morality. Although cloning has been accomplished with many animals, is it ethical to perform with humans? Human cloning deals with important issues such as enjoyment for the wealthy.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Ethics Of Human Cloning

    1614 Words  | 7 Pages

    Not only are there many ways in which human cloning can be misused, such as, creating clones for organ donors or replacement children, but cloning has also proved to be rather dangerous (Hoskins). It takes scientists many attempts and many failures before they successfully clone animals and there is no reason to think it would be different with humans (Harrison). Many human embryos would need to be sacrificed in order to protect this practice and many of these children clones who did survive would

    Read More

  • Is Human Cloning Is Wrong Essay

    1531 Words  | 7 Pages

    Due to the rapid progress of research in human cloning, scientists are able to create genetic copies of human beings, resulting in a population, lacking genetic variety. With this in mind, I believe the cloning of humans to be wrong; it is fundamentally unethical as it leads to the degrading of humanity (Humans?) Moreover, there are also major risks that are associated with the development of the medical cloning technology. For this reason, I strongly believe that scientists should seize research to successfully clone humans.

    Read More

  • Human Cloning Be Banned Essay

    862 Words  | 4 Pages

    Do you know that based on the scientific studies, 90% human cloning tuned out to be unsuccessful. Human cloning(modifying babies) is a process of producing new identical babies by altering their genomes. Some of studies show that scientists successfully cloned animals such as cows, Pigs, and sheep. For the past 3-5 years human cloning have a lot of debates and controversies between peoples. However Human cloning is dangerous for the new engineered baby and their moms, so it should be banned to prevent new disease, to constantly limit the population of dying human beings, and to stop unnecessary fees to modify babies.

    Read More

More about Human Cloning: A Dangerous Invention

Open Document