With so much terror being spread in the world today governments are beginning to closely monitor the internet usage of their citizens. The major question is: are governments overstepping and breaching the privacy of their citizens? Obviously, the laws in each country are different but the definition to one’s base privacy, as described by Donald M. Gillmor, who alone has written many different law textbooks used in many different universities, and other very respected professors came together to write the Mass Communication Law: Cases and Comments defined privacy as "individuals are entitled to protect personal, intimate aspects of their lives from use or interference by others." To give a valid argument it also needs to be stated how the government
As some of us might know there has been a passionate debate on the issue of the net neutrality in which there is strong feelings on both sides of the debate. Net neutrality is the idea government should regulate the internet so that the major telecommunications companies won’t be able to turn the internet landscape into a monopoly. This paper will examine both sides of the net neutrality debate in which the content of this paper will explore both the pro and cons of net neutrality. At the end of the paper I will reveal my true thoughts about net neutrality and will discuss what I have learned about this issue in the process. Some of the pros of net neutrality include easy access to information, promotion of free speech and promoting innovation for smaller internet companies.
Upholding the freedom of speech, though, requires that responsibility and restraint be practiced by the government, the people, and the individual. Admittedly, keeping the delicate balance of freedom of speech and governmental regulation can prove to be tough work for the leaders of America, especially in light of the many advances made toward online communication. Everyday our government is faced with questions regarding how much speech can/should be censored, who decides what words are lawful and which are not, and at what point does protecting one person_Ñés freedom of speech begin to pose a threat to the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness of other citizens. Personally, I endorse the
Another way civil liberties protects us is through are eight amendment that makes sure the government does give us cruel and unusual punishment. It protects us from people abused when be punished for our crimes. Civil liberties are reason for us being so free in American. It protects us from the government getting to powerful over our amendments that are in the constitution. Our federalism government must be following our civil liberties, or they can get in trouble for violating them.
The term public interest is being referred as making decisions that affect the good order and role of the community and government affairs for the well-being of citizens (Wheeler, 2013). In simple terms, any decisions that the government made, it 's done so for the well-being of its people. For example, the government may state that switching to clean energy such as solar and wind energy will help reduce pollution and in turn may reduce global warming. Whereas for privacy, according to Ruth Gavison (Defining Privacy, 2006), privacy comes in three elements: secrecy, anonymity and solitude. It is a state which can be lost either through the choice of the person or through the action of another.
Rhetorical Analysis of Word Wars A strategic narrative is a story that a nation must tell itself, and the world, to wage a war or to maintain a competitive advantage in the international system (Free Speech). The mass impact of technology has captivated this idea and has used it to express the freedom of speech in ways that has never been done before, but also "[pushes] these limits past common decency" (Wickman 27). Two authors debate with this international problem in different styles but share some of the same concepts and common fallacies on this issue. Lindsay Wickman writes about the formal and informal use of how technology over the years has shaped our government and our overall system of actions. Susan Benesch writes about the permissibility of certain speech, and speech that can potentially incite violence (Benesch 245).
8-10. This article titled “Internet Access: Gordian net” in The Economist which is technological, business and economics based in nature, speaks about net neutrality, a concept that advocates that Internet service providers and government should treat all the data on the Internet equally. A question that this article tries to answer is “How has net neutrality come under the threat in a world that is driven by profit motives?” The article answers the previous question through its main argument that “To ensure that net neutrality pertains over the Internet, it is necessary to get rid of monopolies and regulators must be given greater power to curb underhand
Intro: In the era of Obama, net neutrality rules were set to provide a free and fair internet experience to everyone . Net neutrality is the concept of making all content on the internet available to people at the same speed . However, 3 years later, those laws are now being threatened to be revoked by the Federal Communications Commission(FCC), a US agency that regulates the internet and other technologies to make sure that they are being used fairly ,. Since then, there has been a lot of controversies regarding Net neutrality due to the recent decision made by the FCC to end it . Thesis Statements: Although the decision to end net neutrality has already been made, some people are still arguing whether ending net neutrality was the right decision.
It’s important to recognize this fact and take note of how it affected everyday people. If the United States wants to become better and be a government by the people, for the people instead of one led by monopolists, as Keppler claimed in his cartoon, it is crucial to reflect on the past.
Censorship can be viewed as an instrument for social control, a means through which the society at large or sub-groups within the society tend to limit and restrict views, opinions and information which are in contravention of their values and standards. Governments across the world are using this tool to prohibit or restrict contents which they deem should not be viewed by their citizens. Censorship extends to magazines, books, films and other forms of mass media. Internet is one such form of mass media where censorship has been rampant in the recent past. Internet censorship refers to filtering or limiting of the publishing of, or access to, information available on the internet.