Juvenility
In the year 1999, a 12-year-old boy was sentenced to prison for murdering a 6-year-old girl, rupturing her organs and ribs, and fracturing her brain. After he finished his sentence in 2004, he again has committed several crimes, thus giving him no more second chances, as he was sentenced for life. Most people would say that he deserves it, as he repeatedly commits crimes and that he never learns. By why is that? Is this “Justice”? Even though a child is guilty of a serious crime, they should not sentence him for life like an adult for the sake of justice. That’s why the juvenile justice is implemented in these past few years. Even though this has its advantages and disadvantages, we should implement a law that doesn’t treat juveniles as adult offenders, but it must conform for the benefit of those juveniles, for their health, and for their future.
One of the main reasons why they should not be treated the same as adults is that they don’t have the sense of what is fully right or wrong, from good and bad, and
…show more content…
The advantage of this law is that juveniles can be put through rehabilitation as a means to help them develop a sense of responsibility, accountability, morality, and correct judgment. It also avoids them being exposed to the harsh environment in adult prisons. But the only setback in this law is that offenders can still be deviant of their actions to the society. They still repeat their crimes, as it is like they didn’t learn during the rehabilitation period. And also, the environment in the correctional facilities, those children who establish a hierarchy within the group can also contribute to the child’s behavior. They remain ignorant of the law, thinking that it’s alright to do heinous crimes. The only way to resolve this is to modify the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Law into something that can benefit both the society and the juvenile while discarding its
The exact definition of a juvenile is a “young person” who has yet to reach their 18th birthday. The average life expectancy of someone living in the U.S. is about 79 years old. Proposition 21 requires juveniles to be viewed and tried as adults, including receiving adult punishment such as a life sentence. If a juvenile receives a life sentence before they reach adulthood, more than three-fourths of their life is gone (“California Proposition 21”). Juveniles don’t even have a fully developed brain and as a result, can’t fully understand the circumstances that they find themselves in.
Children/ Juveniles are just now learning the law. Some of them take a chance and learn from there mistakes when they do break the law. Children/Juveniles could possibly rehabilitate because most of them just now realizing what the law is and how it affects them. 2. Discuss options when dealing with serious juvenile crime an possible things that can be done that our judicial system isn't doing right.
The juvenile system was designed a long time ago to try and rehabilitate also to reform juveniles that committed crimes. In some cases, juveniles today have evolved to many more adult crimes. Many of these crimes have come on the form of raping’s and murders. The original
While the crime committed may be atrocious, adolescents should not be sentenced to life in prison without parole; therefore, they should be given a chance to correct themselves through parole. The
Juveniles in prison face increased violence and sexual abuse, and are at much higher risks of committing suicide than juveniles in juvenile prisons. In addition, the number of released prisoners that turn back to crime is much higher for those that were juveniles in adult prisons. Juveniles will face the consequences of their actions in juvenile prisons, but will also be given a second chance to change their lives through rehabilitation. It is time to stop failing this nation’s juveniles and build a system that benefits not only these children, but society as a whole through the end of a vicious criminal
We have seen today in society of how crime rates have been rampant and how statistics show that most of the crimes were being made by minors. I believe that when most of them look at the bottom of these young offenders come disproportionately from impoverished single-parent homes that are located in the neighbourhoods desinvertido and have high rates of learning disabilities, mental health, and substance abuse and problems with the help of the system of juvenile justice that can make a great return on a successful transition to adulthood. Their ages ranged from 20 and under, most are under fifteen years of age. Juveniles tried as adults must assume the same consequences as any other criminal and are subject to state prisons with inmates much higher and that have probably committed crimes much more tortuous then you could ever have. These minors between the ages of nine to twenty according to the offence committed or of the number of times that are prosecuted and believe that it is immutable.
Juveniles need rehabilitation instead of lifelong sentences their deviance could be factors of conformity to how they grew up, and we need to help them grow out of their old ways to become a new person instead of sitting in a cell for the rest of their
It plays a key role because the fate of these once teenagers’ lives, was in the hands of a jury and a judge. Many people find this way of punishment unfair. How can you sentence someone who is just entering middle school to life in prison?
They know that by committing an “adult crime” should be punished with adult consequences. As an early age they know that they their actions can lead to a consequence and they need comprehend that they cannot get away with their crime. In the article “Babies Know What’s Fair” by Association for Psychological Science, they have research that babies know the difference of what is fair or unfair- in other words what is right and wrong. At the age of 19-21 months infants start recognizing what is generally fair and can apply to many different situations, according to Psychology graduate Stephanie Sloane (Association for Psychological Science). This can infer that at a young age infants know that when something is wrong or correct in a situation, so when they are older they know that when making a plan to hurt someone is wrong and they know the consequence of their actions.
When people commit crimes, there should be disciplined no matter what. Juveniles need to learn that their behaviors have consequences. Why should kids be given any less of a punishment for committing the same crime? According to one author, “Taking a life is murder regardless of the age of the offender, and the penalties to be imposed must not discriminate. After all, the victim’s life will never be returned, and the family will permanently lose their loved one” (“7 Top Pros and Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults”).
The juvenile justice system has made numerous of ethical issues when managing juvenile offenders. The issue with the juvenile justice system is the laws and rules that govern it. It has led to years of controversial debate over the ethical dilemmas of the juvenile corrections system, and how they work with youth offenders. The number of minors entering the juvenile justice system is increasing every month. The reasons why the juvenile justice system faces ethical dilemmas is important and needs to be addressed: (1) a vast proportion of juveniles are being tried and prosecuted as adults; (2) the psychological maturation of the juvenile to fully comprehend the justice system; and (3) the factors that contribute to minorities being adjudicated in the juvenile justice system are more likely than White offenders.
Those in favor of trying juveniles as adults believe that it deters and minimizes crimes being committing by all minors. That trying juveniles as adults will bring the greatest good to the most amount of people. According to an article posted by the American Bar Association by Nicole Scialabba, “the increase in laws that allow more juveniles to be prosecuted in adult court rather than juvenile court was intended to serve as a deterrent for rising youth violent crime.” It is no secret that youth commit crimes in our society. In 2014, law enforcement agencies in the U.S. made an estimated 1 million arrests of persons under age 18 (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention).
There are many different offenses that get sent to juvenile court. Most crimes sent to juvenile court aren’t too serious, but are still bad enough to be sent to court. “Unofficial reports suggest that a higher percentage of juvenile are involved in minor criminal behavior; grossly underreported common offenses include vandalism, shoplifting, underage drinking, and marijuana use”(Hales). There are instances where more scarce offense occurs and sometimes more serious misdemeanors but the offenses aren’t as common as vandalism, thief, underage drinking, etc. Some uncommon cases are usually shootings or murders.
Prior to 1899 in the United States, children who committed a criminal offense were tried and punished as adults. Children were being institutionalized with adult criminals where they were picking up negative influences preparing them for a life of crime. Progressive and social change demanded that children be protected and educated instead and therefore a separate court system for juveniles was subsequently established to address this problem. It has since being argued that juvenile courts have abandoned their role to rehabilitate juvenile delinquents and should be abolished.
Can you imagine waking up behind closed walls and bars? Waking up to see your inmate who is a 45-year-old bank robber and you are a 14-year-old minor who made a big mistake. This is why minors who have committed crimes should not be treated the same as adults. Some reasons are because the consequences given to minors in adult court would impact a minor’s life in a negative way. If a minor is tried through a juvenile court, they have a greater chance of rehabilitation.