Many people think that the popular vote system is more logical than the electoral system. But there are many reasons why the electoral system works better than the popular vote system. The electoral college gives small states an equal opportunity to bigger states. Many small states are ignored due to their population. The second reason is that it safeguards uninformed voters. This is very helpful because some people are not aware of their decision. Finally, the electoral college prevents too many third party candidates from running. Third parties don’t win but they do steal votes. These are the reasons why we should keep the electoral college and why we shouldn’t have a popular vote system.
One of the most popular reasons why we should keep the electoral system is that it gives small states an equal opportunity. If the president was elected through popular vote the areas of America with more population would rule the White House. But in the electoral college the smaller states have a more equal vote. Small states can make a big difference when it comes to tight elections and because of that candidates cannot ignore the smaller states. But if we had the popular vote system the candidates would only travel to bigger states with a larger population.
…show more content…
Some people in America are voting and do not know who they are voting for and why. The electoral system has a winner-take-all system. This means that whatever party has the most votes in that state wins the state’s electoral votes. There are more educated voters than uneducated voters which means that the educated voters will rule the state. This causes the uneducated votes to be lost in the mix of the educated
Like many others great creation the Electoral College has some downfalls. The first con of the Electoral College according to Amelia Josephson " It gives too much power to swing states". What this means is when candidates run for president are more likely to target swing states rather than going to a state that always goes blue or red. Candidates do this because they are trying to sway the swing there way so they can win, which then gives the swing states power into picking the presidency. The second con the Electoral College according Kathleen McCleary
The Electoral College exists, according to the Federalist Papers, in order to account for the opportunity of the tyranny of the majority or factions. It gives us the responsibility of choosing the President and members that are the best for us that prevents from bias opinions on who is chosen. The reason that the Constitution calls for this extra layer, rather than just providing for the direct election of the president, is that it will harm us a whole. James Madison worried about what he called "factions.” Until today, we are afraid of what Madison called, "the tyranny of the majority" – was that a faction could overgrow 50% of our population, at which point could sacrifice the rights of other citizens.
The third reason the Electoral College should continue to be used, is that it reduces problems such as fraud, recounts, lawsuits, and runoff elections. Because of the structure of the Electoral College, fraud becomes isolated and more difficult to attempt. It reduces recounts and lawsuits as it sets a threshold for a candidate to win and makes the winner apparent at the end. Also, by setting a threshold, it can eliminate runoff elections. In 227 years, the winner of the popular vote has lost only five times, which shows that the electoral college is working.
Imagine how the country would be different today if we had used a direct popular vote instead of the Electoral College. The voting system came into place when getting trying to receive all of the American citizens votes was a hard task to accomplish. Also at the time, quite a few citizens were illiterate and disbursed geographically. Now with the power of technology, it is easier process to get every single American vote. The Electoral College is an unfair voting system used in Presidential elections and should be replaced with a direct popular vote.
voting system is not only rooted in white supremacy and oppression, but also perpetuates it. While not obvious at first glance, there was another reason that the Electoral College was created: the slave population. James Madison, a promeninet American icon, was incredibly aware that both the South and North had an equal amount of people, but the same anot be said of eligible voters. About one-third of the Southern population were enslaved, therefore the South would have been at a disadvantage. Even after slavery had ended, it was difficult to have your vote be counted if you were anything but a white man.
The argument considering the validity of the electoral college system is home to many complicated components, therefore, creates very diverse opinions. In addition, not all voters are well educated as to how the system works as a whole nor the beginnings of the electoral college and why it was called to action. Because many people are only exposed to portions of the media, biases are easily founded. Some would argue that the electoral college helps the nation to manage large numbers of votes and essentially "round-out" a winner. When the elections are fairly slanted towards one candidate, the electoral college is helpful in fully distinguishing a winner.
If we somehow happened to be a capable vote, then we ought to have the capacity to really pick who might be president. The Electoral College removes that from us. The Electoral College is not by any stretch of the imagination reasonable for our rights and our opportunity. It, for the most part, takes away the ability to vote the president. The Electoral College was made in a period when votes were harder to gather and number.
The system may seem confusing or unnecessary, but its importance is revealed by the care taken by the Founding Fathers in designing the Electoral College, which was described in more detail and at greater length than any other issue addressed in the Constitution (Guelzo and Hulme). Despite this, many still call for a shift to a popular vote system for the presidential election; however, such a change would be a mistake. The Electoral College should not be abolished and replaced by a popular vote because it is necessary to uphold the structure of the United States government, to protect the interests of the whole nation, and to preserve the integrity of the presidential election. Opponents of the Electoral College frequently argue that the Electoral College is outdated to the point of becoming obsolete, that it contradicts America’s identity as a democracy, and that it gives too much power to states with a small population. Critics of the Electoral College condemn it as a relic of a bygone era.
To Dan Newhouse, Although some people say the electoral college is best for the public, it is actually putting chains on their opinions. Many people would say that the founding fathers made the electoral college because it was the best way to vote in their time. But what they don’t realise is that the electoral college is outdated, we have more people, and technology now, and that allows everyone to vote. That is why the electoral college should be stopped, so the chains that keep the citizens opinion’s down are broken.
Because of this it makes third party candidates have a way harder time getting the electoral votes that they need from the Electoral College. This makes it so that we have political balance with these being our 2 main parties and makes sure that Presidential candidates have wide support all across our country. One argument that people make against the Electoral College is that the winner of the popular vote can still lose the presidency. Because in the United States the President and Vice President is elected by the Electoral College. This can cause people to be upset with the candidate that is elected because they feel they should not be elected if the population of the country wants the other person more.
The electoral college has always successfully chosen a president and benefited small states. However, in the more recent years there has been much debate as to whether or not this system works for our country. There have been five times when the winner of the popular vote loses the election leaving citizens wondering
The founding fathers were smart and thought long and hard about the best ways to help our country vote and the electoral college is what they agreed on. There is no need to be, “tinkering with a process that is over two centuries old [because it] could destabilize one of the steadiest political systems in the world” (Stepman). Since the system has worked so well for so long it's hard to find good reasons to change it. In conclusion, we should keep the Electoral College because its fair, have lower risks of mistakes, and has been always been successful.
This system makes a safeguard around our votes. “Using electors instead of the popular vote was intended to safeguard the presidential election against uninformed or uneducated voters by putting the final decision in the hands of electors who were most likely to possess the information necessary to make the best decision in a time when news was not widely disseminated.” (Electoral College). The Electoral College gives voters peace of mind because they know the electors are educated on what they want and will vote accordingly. Some may say the popular vote is better in this situation because it gives each vote an equal amount of power and it would eliminate the threat of a faithless elector.
The electoral college gives citizens the impression that their votes would not matter after all, causing them to just stay at home rather than going out and participating in the elections. This can discourage people from educating and informing themselves about our country
The Electoral College system assures balanced power between the states, puts the independent parties under control, grants balanced voting, and supports the major political parties. The Electoral College has proven itself to be very sufficient in determining the president and the vice president of the United States. Since this system has been successful since our Founding Fathers created it, there should be no reason as to why we should get rid of the Electoral