1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, seven consecutive years Lance Armstrong was the Tour de France winner. Not until after he retired did he confess his true story about using PEDs (Performance Enhancing Drugs) to win and cheat the drug tests (Khing 52). Seven years in a row he beat the drug test and didn't get caught. Even with the rumor that he was cheating the UCI (Union Cycliste Internationale) who was responsible for testing in the Tour de France did not try to change their testing for the better to make sure Lance Armstrong was not cheating.Even though many changes would have to be made in sports, drug tests need to be stronger because too many athletes cheat the drug test and it puts other competitors at a disadvantage. …show more content…
In the 2000 Sydney Olympics Antonio Pettigrew, a runner for the US men's 1,600-meter relay team had admitted to using PEDs before and after the race (Jendrick). But the drug test did not catch him in the act of doing so, it failed its main purpose and showed how people could still cheat in the Olympics. The Olympic committee when testing athletes for drugs provide too many reasons for athletes to miss the test, also they test to infrequently (Jendrick). A solution to this problem is to act like the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) if an athlete misses a drug test date they will receive the consequences as if they were to test positive ("Frequently Asked"). Another solution from the NCAA is to have randomly selected dates and athletes, so they cannot prepare to cheat the test and instead they will get caught for their …show more content…
In the MLB (Major Baseball League) a first time use is a fifty game suspension, a second time offense is a one hundred game suspension and the third time is a season long (Egendorf 48). In the NHL (National Hockey League) the first time offense is twenty games, second offense is a sixty game suspension, third time offense is a lifetime ban(Egendorf 48). In the NFL ( National Football League) a first-time offense is a four-game suspension, a second time is eight games and a third time is a one-year suspension (Egendorf 48). Lastly, in the NBA (National Basketball Association), a first-time offense is a ten game suspension, a second time is a twenty-five game suspension and a third time is a ban from the league (Egendorf 48). The sports that have a ban from the league as a third-time offense have the lowest drug or PEDs use players
The history of drugs in sport is one of the main impacting factors on its impact within society because it is through the history that many other aspects such as the economy have been impacted. The use of drugs in sport by athletes such as Lance Armstrong throughout the history of high performance sport has meant that with every new method of testing that the world anti-doping agency is coming out with, there are people coming out with ways for their athletes to undetectably dope. This has meant that because athletes have seen other athletes such as Lance Armstrong get away with doping for so many years, they believe that they too can easily get away with in, therefore creating an increase in the use of drug in sport. Between 2012 and 2013 there was a 20% increase in the positive testing to drugs by both Olympic and non-Olympic sport. This is a dramatic increase because of the fact that there was only an increase of 0.8% in the amount of drug testing preformed (14).
A step in this direction is the new drug testing program that was negotiated and approved by the owners and players for the 2005 season. It is far more comprehensive, intrusive, and punitive than the 2002 program that it replaced. Time will tell whether the new program will rid the sport of the blight which allows juiced-up players to achieve phony records that overshadow authentic accomplishments (Staudohar. 2005).” All players work hard everyday, but the ones who are taking steroids to get ahead faster are just cheating themselves. Although, there could be a brighter side to steroid use.
A drug test is a biological specimen of urine, hair, blood, breath, sweat, or saliva. It is used to determine the presence of drugs or metabolism. In the Nfl drug tests are used for many reasons one of them being that they aren’t allowed and there is much information to prove that. All players are tested at least once per league year during training camp for substances of abuse including marijuana. This makes not so much sense because if there are reports that you were using any kind of drug your team could drug test you immediately.
For years, the use of performance-enhancing drugs has haunted all levels of sport, baseball taking the majority of the publicity. Many have lost sight of the fact that baseball players are not the only athletes that face this life threatening addiction. Due to the amount of padding they have to wear, football players can easily disguise their size therefore keeping them from receiving scrutiny from the public. This has allowed more and more players to look to PEDs in order to gain an edge over their opponents. The issue spans to not only the professional level, but the high school and collegiate divisions as well. Because the National Football League sits on a higher platform, they bring in an exceptional amount of money compared to that
Student Athletes Being Tested for Drugs What would you do if your child or children were snorting heroin and/or grinding up adderall and snorting that? Would you get them tested for drugs? Hispanic boys and colored girls have seen the biggest jump in drug use. They are not only using alcohol or marijuana, but they are also snorting heroin and grinding adderall and snorting that as well. Adderall is a medication that is used to treat attention deficit disorders.
Mahmoud Elbadry Dr. Maha Hassan Rhet 1020-08 13 March 2016 Performance Enhancing Drugs: An Annotated Bibliography Research Question: Why do athletes use performance enhancing drugs, what is the ethical dilemma in using them, and what are the effects of their use on sports? Anderson, Jack. " Doping, sport and the law: time for repeal of prohibition?" International Journal of Law in Context.
By allowing professional athletes to use drugs, what message are we sending out to young sports players and those who idolize their sporting heroes? Is the goal to inform them on how to cheat, or how to use your own muscle and blood to win? Performance-Enhancing drugs used by athletes can cause many health problems and create an unfair advantage to other athletes. Many of the performance enhancers used have serious health risk and allow the use of such substances could cause peer pressure to all athletes to consider using them. Athletes dreaming to improve their performance the easy way are often the first you see to start using substances; this places them at risk of the many consequences.
Background: Performance-enhancing drugs have been widely used in sports for centuries. The first recorded use of PEDS in sports was during the ancient Olympic games in 776 BC when athletes experimented with herbal medication 2. However, what qualifies as cheating to us was perfectly acceptable to them and the athletes that participated weren’t
But this applies to only those who resort to cheating ways. Sports persons always hit the headlines for a lot of controversies like using drugs, playing for two clubs, abusing the fans of other countries or clubs or inappropriate behaviour in the field or breaking the code of conduct and so on and so forth. The problem does not stop here; the sports medicine which the players take is also causing serious debates and discussion. Issues like faking injury, losing intentionally to get a stronger opponent and failing the gender test had also surfaced in the
Performance Enhancing Drugs (PEDs) have been used in sports for many years. The common term for it is doping. It is one of the most important issues among professional athletes today. Doping should not be allowed in professional sports. The use of performance-enhancing drugs creates a disadvantage for the athletes that don't use PEDs since they will not perform as well as the athletes that used the drugs during the game or competition.
“Before steroids, records were made to be broken. Now they’re stolen,” is a quote that many know. The number of athletes who use steroids is staggering. First of all, the health effects could create huge problems for the athletes. Next, the consequences for using steroids are huge.
Athletes use of performance enhancing drugs has become all too common in today’s society. With many athletes testing positive for doping, sports are becoming tarnished with athletes trying to gain an unfair advantage on their competitors. Although players are tested often for such drugs, there are still many loopholes and some drugs are not detected by current systems. So what would cause an athlete to put their body at risk to gain just a slight edge on their competitor? Sports should be a test of real skill, not artificial skills given by doctors.
Mr. J. Hirby of lawdictionary.org states: Many professional athletes take steroids illegally, which not only represent a potential felony convictions but may also result in permanent career damages. People take steroids because it helps them build muscle quickly and perform more effectively at top levels. However, they are considered cheating by many sports enthusiasts, and they are banned from use because no organization wants to lend its support to a practice that leads to severe health risks for the sake of improved athletic performance (Hirby). This quote stated above describes how it is in-fact cheating to use steroids in pro sports as believed by sport enthusiasts and many fans.
We need to educate the athletes so that they understand that there are long-term impacts from taking performance enhancing drugs. Not only physically but also emotionally and psychologically. Another example of a negative impact of being branded a drug cheat is when
Blood doping is very large in the sport of professional cycling. This is due to the extreme length and intensity of the races. Any advantages, artificial or natural, that the riders can get they will take. In fact, when it comes to the Tour de France, in order to find a rider that completed the race naturally without any performance enhancements you would have to search as far as 30th place. Nearly 80% of the Tour de France medalists from 1996 through 2010 have been tainted by blood doping.