ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Malcolm Machiavelli

1728 Words7 Pages

Life is full of people who were meant to lead, and others who were meant to follow. This aspect of life has dissipated over recent years, but it was one of the most important aspects of life during the time of feudalism. Kings and queens were the most important aspect of a nation, their personal ability lent itself directly to the stability and prosperity of the kingdom. There are thousands of examples of terrible monarchs in history, but less examples of ‘good’ monarchs exist. Frederick the Great of Prussia, Victoria of The United Kingdom, Joseph II, and Louis XIV are examples of monarchs that have used their extreme amounts of influence to exert their force on the world in order to win favor for their realm. All of these monarchs followed the same set of rules, a set of rules and suggestions compiled in the book titled The Prince, by Machiavelli. Here, Machiavelli sets down the basic rules, the dos and don’ts, and the importance of proper governance for a monarch in the Renaissance. The many tips are followed by all of these monarchs, and …show more content…

In order to understand Macduff’s integrity, he would employ one of his greatest tools, manipulation. Malcolm is able to pry into Macduff by lying about himself and actually does find his true loyalty, this is extremely important to the Machiavellian idea of a good monarch. Without the ability to compromise and deal with others to win out their loyalty is incredibly important to the stability of an entire kingdom, and especially important for a monarch in such a precarious situation as Malcolm. This idea can be applied to all potential supporters of Malcolm’s claim, as he needs as many bodies as possible to oust Macbeth from the Scottish realm. However, too much manipulation is a recipe for disaster as nobody follows a liar, Malcolm easily maneuvers this obstacle by revealing his lies to

Show More
Related

  • Age Of Absolutism Dbq

    733 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1513, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote “The Prince,” telling rulers how they should rule. (Document 1) Many of the ideas in his book are shown in the ways these rulers governed their people. King Louis XIV believed if there were multiple people had power more would take advantage of it (Document 3) which is a major idea from “The Prince,” stating “for love is held by a bond of obligation, which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it.” (Document 1).

    Read More

  • Otto Von Bismarck Dbq

    662 Words  | 3 Pages

    Otto von Bismarck Otto von Bismarck was the first chancellor of the German Empire. He was a master strategist who used realpolitik. As an aristocrat, he “adopted the liberal goal of national unity, giving the German Empire a broad political base” (Background essay). Otto von Bismarck could be considered Machiavelli's model of the ideal ruler in that, he was feared by his people and he used any ends to justify the tactics he used in bringing about the unification of the German states. Niccolò Machiavelli was a diplomat for many years in Italy’s Florentine Republic during the Medici family’s exile.

    Read More

  • The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Niccolo Machiavelli's book, The Prince (1513), he evaluates on how a prince can be a successful leader. Machiavelli’s purpose of this guidebook was to construct his argument to the rising ruler Giuliano de Medici for when he comes to power in Florence. He adopts a casual but authoritative tone in order to convince the prince that Machiavelli’s evaluation on how to be the best prince, is the right thing for the prince to do without coming off as he knows more than the prince or is trying to intimidate him.. Machiavelli’s reference to previous rulers and whether their tactics failed or succeeded helps to benefit his credibility along with his allusion to historic text. He appeals to our logic by simply stating a prince can only do what is within his power to control, and his use of an analogy furthers his argument.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Martin Luther And Machiavelli

    1560 Words  | 7 Pages

    Machiavelli and Luther: An Examination of Authority in the 16th Century Written in 1513 Florence, Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince aims to serve an educational purpose, enlightening those in power on ways to secure authority and hold onto it. Separating ethics from the acquisition of power, Machiavelli essentially lays forth a guide to achieving and maintaining ruler status with emphasis on sustaining an adequate military force and establishing a rapport with the populace. In 1520 Saxony, Martin Luther wrote the treatise “Concerning Governmental Authority” not to educate, but rather to explore the role of earthly authority and punishment in a Christian context.

    Read More

  • Niccolo Machiavelli's Influence On The Enlightenment

    1834 Words  | 8 Pages

    Niccolo Machiavelli and his influence on the Enlightenment Niccolo di Bernardo dei Machiavelli, also known as the father of “Modern Political Theory” was a well-known Italian diplomat, politician, humanist, historian, philosopher and writer from the era of renaissance philosophy. He belonged to several schools of thought, namely: Renaissance humanism, Political realism, Classical republicanism. His claim to fame was his popular book, “The Prince”, which was a handbook for politicians on the use of ruthless, self-serving, cunning inspiring the term “Machiavellian.” Before he wrote his book, Machiavelli was a diplomat for 14 years in Italy’s Florence Republic during the Medici family’s exile.

    Read More

  • Duncan's Betrayal In Macbeth

    402 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, since Macbeth is king of all the land opposing him would be treason. Yet Malcolm continues with his plan and forms an army that goes to attack Macbeth. Macduff ends up killing Macbeth himself. Moreover, Malcolm takes the throne for himself. Power and authority shifts once again.

    Read More

  • Theme Of Ambition And Greed In Macbeth

    569 Words  | 3 Pages

    Macduff went to England to find Malcolm, King Duncan’s son, who fled Scotland so he would not be killed like his father. Macbeth no longer considers Macduff loyal to him and becomes apprehensive. Macbeth consorts with the murderers again to kill Macduff’s family, “give to the edge o’ the sword his wife, babes, and all unfortunate souls that trace him in his line” (Act 4, Scene 1). When a messenger comes to deliver the news to Macduff, he becomes sad but Malcolm tells him “… Let grief convert to anger…” (Act 4, Scene 3).

    Read More

  • Courage In Macbeth

    431 Words  | 2 Pages

    When Macduff arrives in England to ask Malcolm for assistance on war with Macbeth, Malcolm explains, “What [he] believe, [he’ll] wail; What know, believe, and what [he] can redress, As [he] shall find the time to friend [he] will” (Shakespeare 4.3.10-12). Malcolm expressed his passion for his country and his ability to stay true to what he believes in. This conducts the first sign of courage established by Malcolm in the entire play; testing Macduff’s loyalty to gain knowledge on his true intentions. Malcolm does not follow in his father’s footsteps to prevent the same fate upon him, revealing a new virtuous side of the character. This quote proves he will do anything to right what is wrong in the kingdom, which indicates not only character development but bravery as well, especially when he joins his army to fight against Macbeth in war.

    Read More

  • Macbeth Disrupts The Great Chain Of Being Analysis

    2486 Words  | 10 Pages

    Macbeth was influenced by the witches and the constant berating and bullying by his wife. He allowed himself to be corrupted and coerced and finally disrupted the Great Chain of Being himself by killing the God-chosen king and replacing him with himself. Shakespeare uses this plot to demonstrate how the great chain of being was disrupted by false ambition dominating over human nature. Macduff was born of caesarian meaning the whole play of Macbeth is ironic as it takes someone who is unnaturally born to destroy Macbeth. Ultimately, Macduff restores the Great Chain of Being by killing Macbeth and presenting the “usurpers cursed head” to Malcolm, who takes his rightful place as King as the true heir to the throne.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli Fox Advantages

    771 Words  | 4 Pages

    A new breed of powerful monarchs emerged in 15th and early 16th century Europe. These new monarchs strayed away from the previous Middle-age idea of monarchies, who greatly struggled for power. Monarchs of the 15th and early 16th century utilized Italian humanist Niccoló Machiavelli’s ideas of gaining, maintaining, and increasing power to strengthen their authority and prestige. Machiavelli preached the importance for rulers to exhibit characteristics of a cunning fox, as well as a tough lion in order to be successful. The rulers of France, England, and Spain implemented clever and shrewd tactics which included obtaining power and influence over the papacy, reconstructing their governments, and enhancing state revenues through new and effective

    Read More

  • Trust In Macbeth

    887 Words  | 4 Pages

    My first false speaking/Was this upon myself. What I am truly,/ Is thine and my poor country’s to command./ Whither indeed, before thy here-approach,/ Old Siward, with ten thousand warlike men” (4.3.132-136). This, of course, shows that Malcolm was a good and noble man in which no one truly needed to doubt. Even in this situation though, Malcolm was wary of Macduff. Being suspicious actually helped both Malcolm and Macduff into seeing the clearer picture.

    Read More

  • Integrity And Responsibility In Shakespeare's Macbeth

    661 Words  | 3 Pages

    Integrity can be defined as being honest and having strong morals. Being able to balance one’s own integrity and professional responsibility is what determines how successful they will be. If someone’s personal integrity and professional responsibility aren’t balanced, they will interfere with or hinder the other. Ultimately, a person is successful if they can balance their personal integrity and professional responsibility.

    Read More

  • Erasmus Vs Machiavelli

    1034 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the early sixteenth century there were two people that wrote about political power and the correct way to rule, both of these people would have great influence on their time period as well as future ones. Machiavelli was a secretary who worked for the Medicis, after the Medici family was expelled from the city he would reflect on what he thought of politics and how he thought they should be by writing The Prince, it would become a very famous book even in the present day. His viewpoint on ruling was that a ruler must do whatever they can in order to improve the state no matter what, or in his words “The ends justify the means”(The Prince). Erasmus was a Dutch intellectual and leader of the Christian humanists who wrote a treatise on political

    Read More

  • The Failure Of Leadership In Machiavelli's The Prince

    981 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Prince, written by Machiavelli, is a candid outline of how he believes leaders gain and keep power. Machiavelli uses examples of past leaders to determine traits that are necessary to rule successfully. Leaders such as the King of Naples and the Duke of Milan lacked military power, made their subjects hate them, or did not know how to protect themselves from the elite, causing them to lose power. He says that these rulers should blame laziness, not luck, for their failures. By looking at these historical successes and failures, Machiavelli is able to develop his own thoughts on how politics and leaders should be in the future.

    Read More

  • Niccolo Machiavelli's View On Human Nature

    1518 Words  | 7 Pages

    Social/Political Psychology One of the interest parts in human in this era emphasizes on how people interact and influence one another in groups. Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527), an Italian bureaucrat wrote in his book The Prince in 1532 about guideline for how to take over, defeat, and rule groups of people. The content of the book is based on his observations and descriptions of human behavior. He suggests that “most people can easily be manipulated to behave as a leader wishes, even against their own best interests.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Malcolm Machiavelli

Open Document