Pros And Cons Of Management Styles

2494 Words10 Pages
In an organization, managers carry out several functions and play many key roles. They are accountable for handling many situations, most of these situations are different from each other and when the time comes to handle such situations, managers use their own management styles. But it all depends on situations because one specific management style doesn’t solve the problem for every situations, so for that we have different types of management styles. Therefore by different types of management styles managers will be able to handle different situations at the best way they can. Management styles works as a leadership method used by a manager. One of the objective for the managers is to plan, organize and implement those resources in a way…show more content…
A strong leader who utilizes an autocratic style can take charge of the group, assign tasks to different members, and establish solid deadlines for projects to be finished iii. It allows members of the group to focus on performing specific tasks without worrying about making complex decisions iv. This type of management allows group members to become highly skilled at performing certain duties, which can be beneficial for the group.

Cons of Autocratic Style –
i. Some people start using this type of management for their benefit like treating the staff as slaves, making them work overnight ii. By not giving credit to the staff for their work and effort iii. People in the group may dislike that they are unable to contribute ideas iv. Autocratic leadership often results in a lack of creative solutions to problems, which can ultimately hurt the performance of the
…show more content…
She had a combative style which earned he the tabloid nickname “the Queen of Mean.” Her autocratic leadership style did make the Helmsley hotel chain popular for sure, her demands of perfection from everyone, and her exacting ways scraped the dignity of everyone on her payroll, from cleaning staff to top executives. She allegedly “treated people like a garbage.” one example being to fire on the spot a secretary daring to use the Helmsley Palace dry cleaner to remove an accidental spill on her cloth, even though she had worked diligently for eight years. So this sets to be one of the well knows example of an autocratic leadership.

3. Laissez-Faire Management – Laissez-Faire style of management is also called as delegative leadership it’s a type of leadership style in which leaders are hands-off and allow group members to participate in decision making. Laissez-faire management is one of the four widely used management styles in business. This style of management allows the employees to stamp their own creative freedom and ideas on the company but the laissez-faire style leaves a great deal of responsibility and creativity in the hands of the workers, which is why it’s so important to get the appropriate team

More about Pros And Cons Of Management Styles

Open Document