In May 2017, Italian government approved a legislative decree that introduces 12 mandatory vaccinations for all children between 0 and 16. Failure to fulfill the obligation entails a fine, the inability to enter the mandatory school, and the possible loss of parental authority. A lot of people (named no-vax) did protests and demonstrations against this decree, defining it an anti-constitutional law because it limits the people Health's choices for their children. Other protests motivations brought by no-vax are fear of the possible collateral effects, vaccines can cause autism, many simultaneous vaccines overload immune system, and they think that they are no more necessary because many infectious diseases are disappearing.
Despite the protests
…show more content…
I want to apply the "Ladder of Inference" method (Mind Tools, 2017, para. 7) to my thinking process and no-vax thinking process, in order to verify the conclusions reached from both sides.
No-Vax Ladder of Inference:
1) Reality and Facts
Legislative decree that introduces 12 mandatory vaccinations. Failure to fulfill the obligation entails a fine, access denied to the mandatory school, and the possible loss of parental authority.
2) Selected Reality
Vaccines' collateral effects.
Vaccines can cause autism (fake news).
Many simultaneous vaccines overload the immune system (fake news).
In other European Countries, there aren't mandatory vaccinations (or they are less than the Italian legislative proposal).
3) Interpreted Reality
Anti-constitutional law because it violates freedom.
4) Assumptions
Vaccines do more harm than good.
5) Conclusions
Vaccines are no more necessary because many infectious diseases are disappearing.
6) Beliefs
Politicians are doing interests of the pharmaceutical multinationals instead of the Italian people.
7)
…show more content…
Failure to fulfil the obligation entails a fine, access denied to the mandatory school, and the possible loss of parental authority.
Italian government wanted to introduce this law because Italy needs to improve his child vaccination rates (OECD, 2017, para. 2).
2) Selected Reality
Scientific evidence tells that vaccines' side effects "are minor (for example, a sore arm or low-grade fever) and go away within a few days" (Center for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2017, para. 1).
The study that links vaccines with autism was judge fraudulent (Hensley, 2011, para. 2).
In other European Countries, there aren't mandatory vaccinations (or they are less than the Italian legislative proposal), but other European Countries have better civic consciousness, and better child vaccination rates (OECD, 2017, para. 2).
"Infants Have the Capacity to Respond to an Enormous Number of Antigens" (Offit et al., 2002, para. 16).
3) Interpreted Reality
Most of the no-vax reasons and evidence aren't valid or objective.
4) Assumptions
Subjectivity, fake news, and lack of information supported by scientific evidence are largely responsible for the no-vax protests.
5)
Also, it is stated that unvaccinated people should have a harder time to opt out of being vaccinated by having a higher health care cost, higher insurance, and separate activities. All of those are over-exaggerated for this issue because, they all call for the government to intrude into people’s personal lives and not giving people the freedom of their rights. In addition, some people do not get vaccinated because of religious views, but it is stated that they can opt out if their religion is documented. So, what happens to the people that become sick and are not vaccinated and cannot afford health care? They could possibly spread a new disease that vaccinations do not cover and puts vaccinated and people who are not vaccinated at risk.
Since our founding, our country has struggled to find a compromise between security and liberty. A balance between the two is exceedingly difficult because we are a fickle species and we change our minds on which we want more. A current controversy that has spiked national security interest is the topic of vaccinations. The United States is on the edge of a public health crisis. For many years, all 50 states have required that parents vaccinate their children against various diseases, including polio and measles, before enrolling them in public schools, and exempted parents who claimed to have religious or philosophical reasons (Ciolli).
No truly harmful side effect has been commonly associated with vaccinations. The benefit of the vaccinations outweigh the negative. The fact of the matter is vaccinations allow protection against deadly diseases this world could once do nothing about. The last opposing argument that has emerged from this topic is that decisions to vaccinate should not be mandatory by law.
Mandatory vaccinations eliminate personal freedoms, and could violate religious beliefs. Also, many people are very skeptical about the effectiveness of the vaccination versus personal hygiene. In an Indiana hospital in early 2012 eight workers were fired due to declining a flu vaccination (Farwell 2016). Lawsuits have even been filed over this dilemma, and if people feel strongly enough to sue over it, then hospitals should see that mandatory vaccinations are causing more harm than help.
compulsory vaccination not only provides benefits to the person being vaccinated but also to the society that we live. A utilitarian would say not being vaccinated would cause more harm than good to our community. Before vaccination thousands of people died every year from disease such as MMR, Diphtheria, Pertussis Poliomyelitis and many others . As vaccines were developed and became widely used, rates of these diseases declined until today most of them are nearly gone from countries around the world.
Vaccination Nation is about the controversy of vaccinations causing autism. The United States federal court denied any link between autism and vaccines, more specifically the MMR vaccine. Vaccines causing autism has been the talk on news, celebrities and magazines. Despite scientist denying that there is no connection this topic has gained several legal claims against vaccines. This has led parents into panic about autism.
I believe parents should not have the right to reject vaccinate their children, because these vaccinations help protect children from many different viruses and diseases. I personally know a family friend that believes that her son’s autism is attributed to vaccinations as a young child. The government should have the right to force parents to vaccinate their kids because it protects the child’s health as well as the health of others. Parents should not face jail time for not vaccinating their kids because it is their child and they do have their own rights. All children who attend public or private schools need to have vaccinations to attend schools, so kids who do not have cannot attend school.
Some children cannot get vaccinations for various reasons. They are at risk every day because they will not be immune to these diseases if they come across them. Other children may carry the disease, and their parents did not decide to immunize them, giving the helpless, unvaccinated other child no chance to overcome the disease. Polio, for example is one disease that was very prominent in the ‘50s and ‘60s, soon after, a vaccine was created. A 2017 study show that, “Polio does still exist, although polio cases have decreased by over 99% since 1988, from an estimated more than 350,000 cases to 22 reported cases in 2017.
However, there are more resounding evidence that disproves the relationship between vaccines and autism that can’t be ignored. The study, published by the Lancet in 1998, conducted by Dr. Andrew Wakefield ignited a controversy in the medical world. 12 children believed to have developed autism participated in a study that reviewed their medical histories and evaluated their developments. They were reviewed for any underlying biological/physiological factors that could affect the child’s health.
Required Immunity Mandatory vaccinations for children in public schools have been the center of much debate since laws were first developed to regulate immunization. Fears from parents about side effects and adverse reactions have steered many away from wanting to vaccinate their children despite the numerous infectious diseases they prevent. These debates have gotten in the way of progression in schools for preventing the spread of disease. To me, the risks of not vaccinating children are far greater than the risks of adverse reactions.
Vaccines are like traffic lights; they ensure the safety of the public, be in heavily crowded areas, like schools, or densely trafficked roads. Traffic lights only work when all people follow the rules. If a car runs a red light, the car runs the risk of killing innocent pedestrians who are complying with the prescribed rules. Vaccines, if not utilized by most people, are ineffective. Even though some parents are concerned over the safety of vaccines, children who go to public schools should not be granted exemptions because vaccines are necessary to prevent outbreaks, children who do not receive vaccines are at risk of disease, and medically compromised children rely on vaccines to prevent disease.
Many people may think that vaccination is a bad thing, that instead of preventing it causes illness, that is not natural. Natural or not, there are many reasons as to why we should vaccinate us and the younger generation. Most of the time children don’t like vaccination because it hurt, but is the responsibility of a parent to seek the wellbeing of his or her child. Vaccination it’s a preventive measure of various diseases. Unfortunately, things like the anti-vaccination movement, the misinformation on the Internet, and the believe that vaccination causes more damage than is worth, have led our society to think that it’s right not to vaccinate.
Modern medicine provides people with the ability to protect themselves from the world’s most fatal diseases. Merely a century ago, it was not uncommon for a child to die as a result of diseases such as polio, pertussis, and tuberculosis. Today, it is highly unlikely for a person to contract these diseases, let alone die from them. However, refusal of vaccinations has been increasing throughout the years due to the anti-vaccination movement. This movement declares mandatory vaccines unconstitutional and vaccinations overall as the cause of autism.
If vaccination is mandated, the majority of the human population will be protected from contracting a specific disease. Thus, this will ensure that the disease will be unable to spread, as there is no carrier to facilitate the infection. Mandatory vaccination will also ensure that the general population stays vaccinated. Take measles for example; 16 years ago, the transmission of measles in the U.S was declared over. However, as more parents opt out from getting measles vaccination for their children, outbreaks of measles have been reported across the states of U.S. in the year of
Vaccinations When it comes to vaccinations, there are many different opinions on immunizing a child, especially when that child’s parent has a strong like or dislike towards vaccinating. Immunizations have existed for at least a thousand years and as technology advances more, there are new vaccines being designed to help protect our children from contracting contagious and sometimes deadly diseases, such as Bordetella pertussis, polio, and even influenza. For decades, all 50 states have required that parents vaccinate their children against various diseases, including polio and measles, as a prerequisite to enrolling them in public schools (Ciolli, 2008). Enrollment in public school requires up to date vaccinations in order to protect the children and even the adults from contracting and spreading a disease, possibly causing an epidemic.