“As things now stand, deadly weapons are easily accessible, studies about the causes of gun violence are prohibited, and the super-political gun industry profits from death.”Some people profit from the gun, some occupations such as killers, spies, and some more terrorists, do anything they can to get the goal. Some common people who may be victims of gun violence, their families or themselves may have been hurt. Because firearms are too easy to obtain at this time and are collected at this time so that gun violence can easily take place. We should ban the sale of firearms. “Too many criminals purchase guns legally and use them to commit crimes.”Terrorists will be difficult to collect large quantities of firearms if it is banned from selling their firearms, and it is also very hard to launch an attack.
More needs to be done to establish an effective way to create stricter gun laws to help reduce violence. Guns have been the weapon of decision for probably the most severe massacres on American soil. Since early history, firearms have been utilized mainly for militia and defense purposes. However, the development of new gun technology has made guns more accessible and deadly. In spite of the fact that the second amendment gives the right to bear, firearms should be controlled and checked by the government since weapons have contributed to a lot of killings in America and will increase crime rates.
This makes it easy for mass shootings to occur similar to the shooting in Las Vegas. Banning assault weapons would make the world much safer by saving many lives. The production, sale, and possession of assault weapons for private citizens should be banned in the US. Assault-style rifles are very dangerous weapons that can be used for very massive shootings, resulting in a very large death toll. In the two
People tend to get tangled in opinions and quotes on rather semi-automatic weapons should be banned or not, such as if they are protected by the second amendment, halting lawmakers from banning them. However, let there be no mistake that these weapons are a life threat to civilians. The amount of semi-automatic guns in the U.S. puts a shockingly large price on the cost the government would pay to buy all the semi-automatic rifles back. A fairly large amount of guns exist in the United States and of that amount, about a third are assault weapons. “A November 2012 Congressional Research Service report found that, as of 2009, there were approximately 310 million firearms in the United States: ‘114 million handguns, 110 million rifles, and 86 million shotguns.’” (Peters).
Any weapon can be deadly, but people want guns banned. Another example is that if there were a good guy with a gun the outcome would be different. In the same article, it states, “In this instance, however, we don 't have to ponder how different the outcome would have been had a "good guy with a gun" been present, since there was one: a police officer working extra duty. Despite being armed and exchanging gunfire with the shooter, the officer was unable to prevent him from gaining entrance to the club.” Sometimes a good guy can’t always save the day. Society today think that just because guns kill a majority of people, if the government bans them, everything in society will be perfect and there won’t be murders or a police officer can always eliminate the danger.
As a matter of fact, strict laws are doubtlessly more effective than any other alternative. John Wiley supports this claim stating, “The other thing to keep in mind is that a ban is more effective at preventing new gun purchases from licensed dealers than it is at taking away guns already owned at the time of the hold” (Wiley). In detail, the author argues how effective will be in the event that guns laws are imposed on society. Bans are necessary for the good of the people. With or without mental illness, it is important to prevent future incidents due to unrestricted laws regarding gun purchases.
If anything, in the current political climate we are in today, there would be much more social pressure for one not to own a gun than there would be to continue owning one. The stigma around guns still exists today that one only wants a gun to show off and go hunting and promote one's “toxic masculinity” as the article so
Another study by the Harvard Injury Control Research Center reported that the most self defense gun uses are illegal, even if the defendant had a license and described the event honestly. This is basically stating that the majority of self defense uses with guns are for escalated arguments. People often say having guns in the house is best to protect themselves from harm, but more than likely, the person trying to harm them is their spouse or significant other (“Gun Threats”). However, when self defense is used, it is more often than than not ineffective. The National Crime Victimization Surveys display little evidence that defending oneself with guns is helpful in reducing the likelihood of injury or death.
60% admitted to getting their hands on the gun they used illegally in the other states. No matter how many rules you put into place, evil people will find a gun if they are dedicated enough. The only people that benefit from stricter gun laws, is the criminal with an illegally aquired firearm. You are 4 times more likely to get stabbed to death than to be at the wrong side of the barrel
A sizable argument for gun control is that a higher number of guns mean a higher number of deaths. Statistics prove that that statement is incorrect. Certain restrictions on firearms have been implemented before, and results were not good. Also, many American citizens use guns everyday to protect themselves, their families, and others. "Gun control" laws are usually proposed on the grounds they will stop the criminal misuse of firearms, but criminals do not obey laws.