Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

833 Words4 Pages
Can nuclear weapons destroy the entire humanity? Are nuclear weapons important for the international peace? Should nuclear weapons be banned? These questions are very relevant, because many people think that nuclear weapons are the most important problem of the modern world. They think that this weapon of mass destruction can instantly ruin the planet and kill all life on the planet. These people are right, because the quantity of our nuclear weapons available in the world are worryingly high. With that being said nuclear weapons help the planet stay at peace. I will focus on this issue in detail and take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear weapons. People throughout the world say nuclear weapons have caused fear within the world and…show more content…
Countries who tend to hold nuclear weapons, say they won 't be used as attack methods on other nations. For example Trident. The government claim that that the submarine is used to deter others from attacking the UK, or it can be used as a last line of defence. Some who argue on moral reasons say that the UK should never be a country that is willing to threaten or use nuclear weapons even during the worst circumstances. Others argue that the the UK shouldn’t be spending up to 40 billion on an uncertain defence method. With the government currently spending around 6% of its annual defence budget on Trident. An example of someone who believes that the the Trident shouldn’t be funded is Jeremy Corbyn, he states that “I do not believe the threat of mass murder is a legitimate way to go about dealing with international relations.” Others argue that if we get rid of the Trident it could put up to 15 thousand in unemployment. Others also argue that Trident isn’t really an independent system, relying too much on America. For example the British Trident missiles being held in Georgia,
Open Document