ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

833 Words4 Pages

Can nuclear weapons destroy the entire humanity? Are nuclear weapons important for the international peace? Should nuclear weapons be banned? These questions are very relevant, because many people think that nuclear weapons are the most important problem of the modern world. They think that this weapon of mass destruction can instantly ruin the planet and kill all life on the planet. These people are right, because the quantity of our nuclear weapons available in the world are worryingly high. With that being said nuclear weapons help the planet stay at peace. I will focus on this issue in detail and take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear weapons. People throughout the world say nuclear weapons have caused fear within the world and …show more content…

Countries who tend to hold nuclear weapons, say they won 't be used as attack methods on other nations. For example Trident. The government claim that that the submarine is used to deter others from attacking the UK, or it can be used as a last line of defence. Some who argue on moral reasons say that the UK should never be a country that is willing to threaten or use nuclear weapons even during the worst circumstances. Others argue that the the UK shouldn’t be spending up to 40 billion on an uncertain defence method. With the government currently spending around 6% of its annual defence budget on Trident. An example of someone who believes that the the Trident shouldn’t be funded is Jeremy Corbyn, he states that “I do not believe the threat of mass murder is a legitimate way to go about dealing with international relations.” Others argue that if we get rid of the Trident it could put up to 15 thousand in unemployment. Others also argue that Trident isn’t really an independent system, relying too much on America. For example the British Trident missiles being held in Georgia,

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of Dropping Atomic Bombs

    310 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Trident

    893 Words  | 4 Pages

    Clearly this is no longer an issue however do they have any value in today’s world? The week claims “Nuclear weapons have guaranteed our security for generations. They remain the ultimate deterrent to any aggressor, and the best means of ensuring peace.” It’s easy to agree with the

    Read More

  • Should The United States Abolish Nuclear Weapons Dbq Essay

    688 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the years of 1945 and 1991, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were involved in what is today is identified as the Cold War. During this dark time many lived in fear due to the newest weapon that would be used in war, nuclear weapons. These weapons caused fear throughout the whole world because of their capability to kill thousands with just one. Today many debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons in the United States. Some argue that the U.S. should abolish nuclear weapons, while others say nuclear weapons should not be abolished in the United States.

    Read More

  • Why Did President Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

    502 Words  | 3 Pages

    The USSR is an ever growing threat to world peace. After the war, they may simply replace Nazi Germany as the new tyrannical power in the world. This bomb, however, would dissuade them. President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a necessary evil.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plants

    824 Words  | 4 Pages

    Over 20 percent of the energy in the United States comes from nuclear energy power plants. (Rinkesh, 2018) They so their best to get as much energy to the country as possible, but there are those out there who don’t agree with them. While there are downsides to nuclear energy, the pros vastly outweigh the cons. Nuclear power plants are a great way to get energy because they don’t let out much pollution, are very efficient, and are very safe.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power

    1230 Words  | 5 Pages

    However, there are a number of controversies over the use of nuclear energy with some supporting its use while others opposing the use of nuclear energy. Despite the controversy on whether to use nuclear energy as an alternative, nuclear power has proved to be safe, reliable, clean, and inexpensive. Therefore, Nuclear energy should replace other forms of power around the globe because it is more environmentally friendly, cost effective, and safe for use and to exist with human beings compared to other forms of energy being used today. One of the main benefits of nuclear energy over other forms of energy is that it is a clean way to produce energy.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Deterrence Between The United States And The Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics

    262 Words  | 2 Pages

    The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The Atomic Bomb

    1256 Words  | 6 Pages

    The United States felt it was necessary to end the war and used one of the most deadliest weapons known to human existence, the Atomic Bomb. Although some experts may disagree, many believe that keeping the topic of why the United States used the Atomic Bomb in textbooks helps teach students crucial facts on the political and environmental effects of it and more specifically about international relations after that led to the cold war and the effects it had on world pollution and human

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombs

    555 Words  | 3 Pages

    First off, not disagree with the decisions of the president to drop atomic bombs in Nagasaki, Hiroshima. The reason why I disagree with the atomic weapons that were drawn in japan is because there were thousand of people who were killed, innocent peoples who died in that bomb drops. there were military men who died, but at the same time is was acceptable for united states to fight, and win the war. United states were discomforted the lost thousand of people, including military, 48,000 people from the united states, military, and innocent peoples. It was grave that the united states had thousands of life that are why they proposed the attack besides japan.

    Read More

  • Berlin Wall Conclusion

    1429 Words  | 6 Pages

    The nuclear arms race was central to the Cold War and I believe that it is still significant because counties continue spending enormous amounts of money on nuclear weapon development and have disagreements over nuclear weapon testing. Because of the fact that the Cold War was in the 20th century and that the Cold War included world super powers, it was easy to find sources to answer my research question as it was well documented. This made answering my research question easy as well as the

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Hydrogen Bombs

    590 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hydrogen bombs are more than 1000 times more powerful than the very common atomic bomb. The explosion is from nuclear fusion which is when hydrogen nuclei (plural of nucleus) are joined to form helium nuclei, releasing great destructive energy and radioactive fallout. When the nuclei combine there is a split second where there is nothing and then there is the explosion. An atomic bomb is the trigger or the smaller bomb of what sets off the hydrogen bomb. We have to be careful with the hydrogen bomb because, if used, it will cause a major catastrophe far greater than the damage done by the atomic bomb.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Energy

    3678 Words  | 15 Pages

    “Nuclear power will help provide the electricity that our growing economy needs without increasing emissions. This is truly an environmentally responsible source of energy.” Michael Burgess Prior to the introduction of nuclear energy, fossil fuel was thought to be the only available source in producing energy. Although fossil fuel, such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas, contains high energy value, it produces too many harmful byproducts that ultimately pollute our environment. With the rising concerns over global warming as more and more greenhouse gases accumulate in our Earth’s atmosphere, many voice such opinions that new alternative, yet sustainable method must be adopted to produce energy.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Banning The Atomic Bomb

    862 Words  | 4 Pages

    Proliferation groups are trying to get the US to lead the way and destroying and disarming their atomic bombs in hopes that other countries will follow. Forster proposes these ideas in his own words. "The goal of the treaty is to "prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament."(Forster). The US cannot just say disarm your weapons and not do the same themselves. The US needs to take charge and start things themselves.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Do We Need Autonomous Weapons?

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    Recently, the controversy over the future of these weapons has sparked an interest in many debates, whether to allow them or outlaw them. The result of these disputes can affect our nation, so it is of the utmost importance to create an analytically acceptable solution. To this degree, it is critically important to properly implement a solution before causing an erroneous mistake. A reasonable approach to dealing with such arduous challenges is to properly understand its benefits and the risks that caused by this debatable, but

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should Nuclear Weapons Be Banned?

    1172 Words  | 5 Pages

    There have been many incidents in which nuclear weapons were almost launched because of accidents and miscalculations. Many nuclear weapons have been taken apart and scrapped. Some countries got rid of them all together, but many countries still maintain their weapons. Nuclear weapons are bad for the environment Nuclear weapons have the capacity to destroy all complex life forms on Earth and its the only device ever created to do that. If only 0.1% of all nuclear weapon explosive would cause widespread famine and a agricultural collapse.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

Open Document