Pros And Cons Of Participative Democracy

1664 Words7 Pages
Democracy is the concept of freedom and respect of one 's rights based on the idea that monarchies or didctatorships have no more place within societies of the XXI siecle. In fact, people living within a community do not need superior authority to respect and beheive according the social norms. Participative democracy in my own opinion would be the key or the expression of a the best set of democratic institutions The European continent where democracy was born in the twentieth century has undergone multiple totalitarianism. Democratic fields is therefore limited to the implementation of a set of safeguards preventing the arrival in power of leaders against the will of the majority. But the democratic idea can not be satisfied and must find…show more content…
Elected a list are chosen based on the number of votes each received. Examples of countries that have adopted this method of voting: the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Italy, Belgium. Preferential voting has the advantage of allowing a more accurate representation in the country 's political reality.
Saut de page Majority voting system, by its amplification effect victories, has the advantage of designating a stable majority, able to govern. However, its main flaw is not confer on the designated meeting a true representation of the electorate. Cutting by riding makes possible "gerrymandering" to eliminate candidates "undesirable" who must be many more votes than in the neighboring riding to get elected.

The proportional voting system is fairer and more democratic but it is criticized for generating government instability. The parties that are able to govern often implement alliances or coalitions with other political parties to obtain a majority in the House of Representatives. The game coalitions can give some small parties "hinges" a key role, more important than their actual weight in the formation of a parliamentary
Open Document