ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Picketing

893 Words4 Pages

Picketing need not always be in the form of a protest and can also be done to persuade. In Hem Chandra Roy Chowdhury v. Kristo Chandra Saha, the court held that a rival hat owner is justified in inducing people by means of persuasion by picketing to attend his market or shop and to dissuade people from attending the market or shop of the rival owner because the act amounts to his expression of publicity. However, there have been certain cases like In Re V Vengan and Damodar v. State of Bombay , where picketing a shop on the ground of discrimination between races and dissuading intending customers from purchasing in that shop was held to be not warranted by Article 19(1)(a). Government employees and servants can also protest in the form of picketing or demonstration, but cannot go on a strike. In Kameshwar .v State of Bihar, the rule made by the Bihar Government prohibiting government servants from participating in any demonstration or strike in connection with any matter pertaining to their condition of service, was challenged. Although the …show more content…

It has been stated to be indispensable for the preservation of a free society and is termed as the touchstone of individual liberty. A free exchange of ideas, dissemination of information without restraints, dissemination of knowledge, airing of different views, debating and forming one’s own views and expressing them are the basic ideas of a free society. Freedom of expression means the right of one to express one’s convictions and opinions freely, by word of mouth, writing, picture or print. So, it includes within its ambit, the expression of one’s ideas by carrying banners and signs. Everyone has a fundamental right to form his opinion on any issue of general concern and also to inform others about it by legitimate means. The State cannot prevent open discussion and open

Show More
Related

  • Why Is Civil Disobedience Important To The Civil Rights Movement?

    526 Words  | 3 Pages

    Peaceful resistance is necessary for social change. The founders of the United States believed in this idea when writing the Declaration of Independence. John Locke, an enlightenment thinker who our founding fathers took ideas from, came up with the idea of the social contract. This is the agreement that a government and its people have and when citizens feel their government is wronging them then they have the right to revolt. Civil disobedience is a form of expressing the social contract and the consent of the governed.

    Read More

  • Norris Laguardia Essay

    553 Words  | 3 Pages

    This act was with respect to reserving the rights of the union to organize peaceful union activities. Before this act was passed, it was declared by a Federal judge that the activities of the union like strike, picketing or, boycott can be held equivalent to violation of law. Therefore, injunctions issued by the court were justified. These injunctions did not remain for a long time and ceased in short period, but even in this

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Protests For The National Anthem

    239 Words  | 1 Pages

    I believe that the owners of professional sports teams should not require their players to stand for the National Anthem, but rather that NFL players should be allowed to take a knee or unite arms because this medium of protest is safer than others. These protests are bound to happen either way because of the social forum integrated into the U.S. that encourages the diffusion of these certain mindsets. Recently, there was a protest in Saint Louis regarding the acquittal of Jason Stockley who shot unarmed Anthony Lamar Smith. In the protest, objects, including bricks and broken clay pots, were thrown and resulted in the injury of police officers. Both of these protests plead the same argument, yet the way they are protested lead to totally different

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Civil Disobedience

    1135 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout history, people had many views of how the US government should be followed or not. We had Samuel Adams who supported that inhabitants must follow the government and people like Thomas Paine and Henry David Thoreau who supported that the government must follow the people. Civil disobedience also comes to mind when defying the government. People question if it 's safe or not or whether it is allowed because of the consequences. These three historical figures each has a different perspective how the government should be handled.

    Read More

  • Creating American Federation Of Labour Essay

    613 Words  | 3 Pages

    The “Haymarket Square” is the most famous confliction. In one protest, some people died from it because angry protestors threw a pipe bomb to policemen and then policemen fought back. This way to struggle with industrialists usually caused the bitter result. Furthermore, a better way to do is stick as a union. One union called “creating American Federation of Labor” was created for skilled and hardworking workers to debate.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of NFL Protests

    681 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many NFL players have started taking a knee during the National Anthem before their games as a way of protesting. Some teams haven’t even come out onto the field during the anthem. These protests were started and lead by former pro quarterback Colin Kaepernick. The players are protesting mostly because of social and racial issues, they aren’t proud of a country that doesn’t treat people of color fairly.

    Read More

  • Freedom Rides Essay

    947 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, the result of the nonviolent protests achieved the goal of persuading the Interstate Commerce Commission to ban segregation on trains and buses nationwide. Following the decision, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 invoked the Interstate Commerce Clause to ban segregation nationwide and bring an end to Jim Crow laws. Both the lunch counter sit-ins and the Freedom Rides were nonviolent protests, and achieved their goal of desegregation. So, does non-violence persuade? (Arsenault,

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience: Is It Justifiable?

    523 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some people might think of destruction or immorality when the words “civil disobedience” come up, but in reality, it’s quite the opposite. Many times in the past, civil disobedience has lead to social reform and building up a better future. It’s a form of resistance that commonly centers on a person’s morals as it’s basis. It’s a powerful tool in protests that has been used many times in the past and continues to be utilized today. Civil disobedience and breaking the law to some extent go hand in hand, which brings up the question, is it justifiable?

    Read More

  • Personal Narrative: My Immigration To America

    553 Words  | 3 Pages

    As a teenager moving to a new country with a different culture, different language, and being thousands of miles away from everyone I grew up with was not an easy change, however, that was precisely what I did in January of 2013 when I came to the United States with my father. My whole world changed since, and shaped my way of thinking. From learning English, adjusting to a new culture, experiencing my first snow and finding my way in my new country, my life has been an exciting adventure. My parents brought me to America almost 5 years ago to have a better life, and to get a better education.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Civil Disobedience

    579 Words  | 3 Pages

    One day in my Honors World History class sophomore year we began to learn about the start of rapid, aggressive imperialism along with the rise of fascism and totalitarian governments. As we delved deeper into this era of history, we began to cover the rise of Hitler and the extermination of the Jews. Like any other person, I could not begin to comprehend how the masses of people, a whole country, would approve of such hate and racist rhetoric. As I continued to try and realize how such actions could be justified, I looked at other examples in history of hate being the norm. I realized this was a pattern in history, exploring slavery, the rule of Stalin, the Armenian Genocide, and other injustices through time.

    Read More

  • Why The First Amendment (And Journalism) Might Be In Trouble

    1055 Words  | 5 Pages

    Freedom of expression is one of the laws the forefathers of America made to empower its citizens and also enables them to live in peace amongst themselves. In most countries around the world, freedom of expression does not exist, so there is always war in those countries. In the article “Why the First Amendment (and Journalism) Might Be in Trouble”, the authors, Ken Dautrich, chair of the Public Policy at the University of Connecticut and John Bare, who is the vice president for strategic planning and evaluation at the Arthur M. Blank Family foundation in Atlanta, conducted a research study on the importance of freedom of speech. They used their research findings to support freedom of expressions. They employed claim of policy, claim of fact and also appeal to pathos and logos in their argument of the importance of the freedom of speech.

    Read More

  • Summary: The Case Against Civil Disobedience

    1290 Words  | 6 Pages

    People's justification to engage in civil disobedience rests on the unresponsiveness that their engagement to oppose an unjust law receives. People who yearn for a change in a policy might sometimes find themselves in a dead end because their “attempts to have the laws repealed have been ignored and legal protests and demonstrations have had no success” (Rawls 373). What Rawls says is that civil disobedience is a last option to oppose an unjust law; therefore, providing civil disobedients with a justification for their cause. Civil disobedience is the spark of light that people encountered at the dead end and they hope that this spark of light will illuminate to show that an unjust law should not exist at all. Martin Luther King, Jr, in his “Letter from

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Freedom Of Speech

    817 Words  | 4 Pages

    The fact that one has the right to say and believe is the foundation for democracy to function. If no one dared to say their opinions, then it had become a dictatorship where only one opinion on how society and the country should work had been the “right”. If people dared to express their opinions, they will help improving the society one lives. Freedom of speech gives one the responsibility to consider what fits into different contexts, and it will make us better persons and people. Simply, people will feel safe in the society they live in.

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Liberal Democracy

    996 Words  | 4 Pages

    What freedom of expression means is that everyone is allowed to express their opinions in whatever way they see fit without restraint, suppressions or penalty from the government. The people should freely be able to look at information and ideas. If a government manipulates opinions and ideas of the citizens by limiting their accessibility to information and using bias, it would be a violation of their right to freedom of

    Read More

  • Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In Malaysia

    1026 Words  | 5 Pages

    As human beings, we are all born with an entitlement of freedom of speech or synonymously known as freedom of expression as it is a basic human right. It is stated in the Federal Constitution and it is important for us human beings to protect our rights to freedom of speech and expression as it is the backbone for a democratic society. Having the right to express oneself freely without any restrictions is an essential part of what it means to be a free human being. Article 10 in the Federal Constitution states that; (a) every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression; (b) all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) all citizens have the right to form associations.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Picketing

Open Document