ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

628 Words3 Pages

A plea-bargaining is when a prosecutor offers a reduced charge or decrease the number of charge. The defendant come to an agreement with the prosecutor to plea guilty to the sentence they are on trial. The defendant pleads guilty to the crime they are being changed with in order to avoid a trail and avoid more severe sentence. Plea bargaining consents of a judge that authorize the tail which accepts or denies the defendants guilty plea. A defense attorney is who advocates for the defendant to protect the right of the individual. The defense attorney communicates with defendant about plea-bargaining, and assistance the defendant receives the correct plea-bargaining. The prosecutor is an individual who represents the government in a criminal or civil …show more content…

Also local government can profit in having individuals of the community agree to a plea-bargaining’s, since the defendant agreed he/she does not have to attend a trail, but will receive a reduced sentencing in prison or predation. When a defendant chooses the probation agreement the individual has to pay court frees, and probation that assistance the local governments. There are also cons to agreeing to a plea bargains defendants usually agree to plea bargains when they are innocent. Defendants take plea bargains for many reasons they do not want to say in jail over night, they have a families, and a huge reason because the attorney convince clients to agree to a plea. Attorneys try to find the best outcome for their client and sometimes chosen to plea guilty is the best out come for the defendant. When a defendant choose in having trail, but the attorney does not feel comfortable that her/she can win the case it can have an impact on the defendant if found guilty they can receives the maximum

Show More
Related

  • Why Did Amy Albritton End Up In Jail

    588 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and defendant where the prosecutor offers the accused to plead guilty to a lesser sentence or to only one of several charges without going to court. What percentage of cases in Harris County are the result of a plea bargain?

    Read More

  • Gideon V Wainwright Case Summary

    631 Words  | 3 Pages

    Defendants asked for leniency and the prosecutor offers a deal and they take it because they are tired of sitting in jail, but few realize that by taking

    Read More

  • Critical Evaluation Of Bordenkircher Vs. Hayes

    1600 Words  | 7 Pages

    Legally, there is no valid answer to that question, a fact, which is demonstrated by the following quote from Bordenkircher. “[W]hatever might be the situation in an ideal world, the fact is that the guilty plea and the often concomitant plea bargain are important components of this country's criminal justice system.” In other words, the legal system depends on plea bargaining and plea bargaining depends on the ability of prosecutors to threaten defendants. Consequently, the Court’s reasoning is not based on a legal foundation, but a practical one. Regardless of how essential plea bargaining may be to the functioning of the judicial system, “implementation of a strategy calculated solely to deter the exercise of constitutional rights is not a constitutionally permissible exercise of discretion” There are many practices which would make the criminal justice system function more efficiently.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargain Research Paper

    1308 Words  | 6 Pages

    The judges benefit also since they don't have to sit through trails they just agree the plea is good for the crime that they committed or not. Since everyone benefits for a plea bargain if the defendant is innocent or guilty the defendant is left to survive on their own if they don't have a great defense attorney that will do what's best and not what's

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    737 Words  | 3 Pages

    If there wasn't any plea bargaining, courts would be overcrowded and forced to be shut down. It is an advantage for the defense since it will be less work required on their part (Tapscott, 2017). Because plea bargains are much quicker and require less work, it keeps the cases moving and courtrooms unclogged. This works for both prosecutor and defendant since the case would close quickly allowing them to move on to bigger, serious cases. The benefit of agreeing to a plea bargain is that it de clogs the courts and the overcrowded jails.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    652 Words  | 3 Pages

    For the defendant, the most significant benefit to plea bargaining is to take away the uncertainty of a criminal trial and to avoid the maximum sentence. Society also benefits from plea bargaining since the agreements lessen court congestion and free up prosecutors to handle more cases. The Cons of Plea

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    747 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plea Bargaining is the most effective tool of prosecutors to minimize the time required to obtain convictions. Around ninety percent of cases are concluded using plea bargaining. (Barkan and Bryjack, Page 2) This process moves cases through the system quickly and prevents the need to add more judges and court systems if these cases were to go to trial. (Barkan and Bryjack, Page 249) From the judge and prosecutors point of view, this is a necessary and effective method of managing caseloads.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargains In Court Cases

    95 Words  | 1 Pages

    Here is the first problem that needs to be addressed, the Sixth Amendment, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial…” only thing fast are plea bargains, but they are surely not fair. The problem is we need plea bargains, because if not then we be having court cases running 24/7, and one judge would be hearing 100 cases a day. This is why plea bargains account for roughly 90% of all criminal cases. Here are three reasons why plea bargains are supposed to be in

    Read More

  • The Consequences Of The Plea Bargain

    186 Words  | 1 Pages

    When the jury trial process is replaced with plea negotiations, we lose trust and reliability in the system. When we give efficiency that the plea bargain has provided power, it comes at a substantial cost. People who are indeed innocent of the crimes they were convicted have now been influenced into pleading guilty for the sake of efficiency. Not to mention the collateral consequences that accompany a person when they plead out. It also undermines the reliability of convictions in general (Gilchrist, 2011).

    Read More

  • Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    This also benefits the courts as courts have a limited capacity to try cases due to time constraints and costs associated with trials. Therefore, with the prevalent use of plea bargaining, some defendants get sentences that are not reflective of the severity of their crimes and even go so far as to mask the actual crime that was committed, such as when a offender who has committed a sexual offense accepts a guilty plea to a different offense, thus masking the actual sex offense that could have more lasting consequences for the offender (Schmalleger, 2016, p.234). Another

    Read More

  • Evidence That Defendant Is Guilty

    851 Words  | 4 Pages

    1. The role of the criminal prosecutor is to prove that that defendant is truly guilty. It is there job to look at all the evidence that is available and use that evidence to show why it is true that that person committed the crime so that they are prosecuted the way that they need to be. The job of the criminal defense attorney is to look at all the evidence that the prosecutor is bringing forth and to show why that evidence is not reliable or does not have any proof that it is linked to the person being accused of the crimes. It is their job to try to keep the accused person from being sentenced.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargaining Case Study

    2366 Words  | 10 Pages

    Plea bargain have become something of a necessity due to overburdened criminal court calendars and overcrowded jails. However, there is always the reality that those lacking the resources for a vigorous legal defense may plead out regardless of their actual guilt. In present, plea bargaining is no longer an adjunct to the criminal justice system but it is a criminal justice system. Undeniably, plea bargaining brings more benefits than harm to the justice system.

    Read More

  • John Pfaff Lock In Sparknotes

    1080 Words  | 5 Pages

    Prosecutors have the power to send offenders away which allows them to make harsh decisions. They offer plea bargains to offenders which often will enable them to do time in prison. Pfaff stated that "as long as prosecutors simply use the tough laws as a bargaining chip, not real punishment, legislators can reap the political benefits of looking tough on crime while avoiding difficult financial decisions" (Pfaff, 2017, P136). Prosecutors offer a plea bargain to get rid of cases quickly and not allow offenders to go to trial because they might receive more prison

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Wrongful Conviction

    949 Words  | 4 Pages

    People plead guilty for crimes that are not committed by them to avoid trial, but by doing so the right decision wasn’t made.

    Read More

  • Wrongful Convictions In Criminal Justice

    539 Words  | 3 Pages

    For those in prison, those who snitch saying the defendant confessed, testifying can be a bargaining chip; the state will often reduce sentence time or

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

Open Document