Pros And Cons Of Positive Liberty

1372 Words6 Pages

“ Positive Liberty Gerald McCullen thought that positive liberty means the conditions of self-realization, where social equality, social justice and equal opportunities are by the government or the state. It also means a condition where individuals make the best of their lives. Amartya Sen who is the defender of positive liberty, identified freedom with the effective ability an individual has, in order to enjoy it. C.B McPherson describes positive liberty as a liberty to act as a fully human being i.e. a man`s ability to use and develop his capacities. DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE LIBERTY. Positive Liberty 1) Protection of individuals and economy from unnecessary interference of …show more content…

The preamble states said that there should be recognition of interest, dignity and equal and ill-alienable rights for all members of the human family is the foundation of justice and peace in the world. The universal declaration asserts that there are four freedom rights which are proclaimed as the most important rights of people. They are; - 1) Freedom of Speech 2) Freedom of Belief 3) Freedom from want 4) Freedom from fear Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedom set forth in this declaration. without distinction of race, color, sex, language, religion, political opinion, property, national or social origin or other statuses. According to the UDHR everyone has a right to life, liberty and property. No one shall be held in slavery or subjected to torcher, cruel treatment or punishment. JUSTICE. The concept of Justice can be used in four ways. 1) Retributive-: it works on the principle of punishment, although what constitutes fair and proportional punishment is widely debated, while the intent may be to dissuade the perpetuator from future wrong doings. The re-offending rate of many criminals indicates the limited success of this

Open Document