Karson Steitz Collard English October 16, 2014 Finance Test rewrite Summary Proposition 47 is a new but very relevant issue which is insisting to reclassify some felonies to misdemeanors. Which will give roughly 10,000 inmates a chance to be released since their crime could be reclassified. As well as create a fund for schools and neighborhoods which means more money will go towards schools and police enforcement so that they can buy more supplies as well as the fund that go towards police enforcement so that they can patrol more places so that the city streets can be safer which is why it is called the safe school and neighborhood act. Facts and proposed budget The primary issue for proposition 47 is that it gives the eligibility to thousands of inmate’s early release. As well as redirects hundreds of millions to public schools and rehab treatment facilities. Proposition 47 will hire hundreds of more police officers but simultaneously release around 10,000 inmates back on the streets it is very contradicting. It gives more money to public schools to spend on necessities but not all schools need that extra money and the schools that do need it , is nearly impossible to spend all of it so where does the extra money go. …show more content…
This proposition gives criminals a strong opportunity to commit the crimes and at the same time receive fewer consequences. Because under this proposition it makes judges treat every criminals as if it were their first time going to court all though it could be their fourth time. Proposition 47 supports criminals in an unrealistic way. What I mean is that they are putting a lot of trust in to the recently accused felonies by releasing them for their changed crime to an
In the article, “How California Became Unforgivable” by Jerry Roberts and Phil Trounstine, they basically describe six key factors that made California impossible to govern. They claim that California wields a "power with the damaged machinery of a patchwork government system that lacks accountability, encourages stalemate and drifts but cannot be steered." Basically, elected representatives in California have no authority, yet still hold responsibility. The six factors mentioned earlier include Proposition 13, budget initiatives, gerrymandering, term limits, boom or bust taxation, and the two-thirds vote. But how do these factors make California impossible to govern?
The proposition 13 amendment is a property tax about how taxes can’t exceed 1% of a property value. California has always had a problem with taxes due to the enormous number of illegal immigrants don’t pay taxes but use public services that are funded by taxes. This was partly solved by legalizing marijuana which made a large dent in the debt California had. Maybe these golf courses paying the correct amount of taxes would fix the tax problem altogether. Land use comes into play because everyone needs to have their property at its best use according to the taxes.
Proposition 54, the Public Display of Legislative Bills Initiative, would 1) prohibit California legislators from passing any bill without posting the bill for the public 72 hours beforehand, 2) require that videos of all the state’s public legislative meetings be posted online for twenty years, and 3) allow anyone to record videos of meetings and use them for “any legitimate purpose.” While proponents argue that this initiative is necessary to increase transparency, you should follow the Democratic Party in opposing it because it would unnecessarily slow down the legislative process, discourage bipartisan compromises, and enable misuse of videos in misleading ads. Furthermore, if Proposition 54 fails, you should offer an alternative piece
IV. Addressing the opposition A. Argument 1 The Plaintiff has argued that this regulation is in best interest for the public and provides security for the society as a whole. They want the regulation to be considered Constitutional because it was voted on by the majority and therefore, it is in the best interest of the community and should therefore be enacted. This argument does not speak to the constitutional issue of the case. The Supreme Court’s main objective is to protect individuals and minorities from oppressive government.
Lautenberg Amendment The Lautenberg Amendment states that if a person is convicted/charged with a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, the person is prohibited to ever own/buy firearms. As a result, the act has impacted people in different ways. In the first place, the act has a positive impact on police officers who respond to domestic violence calls because police officers can be protected from volatile situations where the abuser can harm the police officers and the victim with a firearm. This act also has a negative effect on police officers convicted of domestic violence because police officers cannot longer use/handle/carry firearms.
Vocabulary.com defines proposition as a proposed plan of action. Each proposition was made to help, educate, and even fight against certain benefits. The 3 propositions that were passed in the 1990 was Proposition 187, Proposition 290, and Proposition 227. Proposition 187 was concerning illegal immigrants; Proposition 290 was concerning public places to stop discriminating; and lastly Proposition 227 where English was taught as a secondary language. Each of these propositions had its own historical value.
60 percent of drug cartel revenue comes from the illegal U.S. marijuana market. As a result of the prohibition of marijuana, vicious drug cartels have been created across the border. The number of deaths caused by cartels have significantly increased so much that they surpass the amount of U.S troops killed in Iraq and Afghanistan combined. The Californian government is facing historic deficits that lead to factors which could destroy the economy. By controlling marijuana, Proposition 19 will help cut off funding to the cartels and decrease the amount of deaths caused by them as well as providing a new source of money for the government.
Proposition 54 was a measure that Californians were asked to vote on in 2003 that sought to prohibit state and local governments from classifying any individual by race, ethnicity, color, or national origin. An excerpt of an argument in favor of this proposition states that California is the most racially and ethnically diverse state, and that it is the wrong for the government to put a label on Californians based on their ethnic background. The thesis of the argument is that the government should stop categorizing its citizens by color and ancestry. The argument's t main premise is that being asked to state one's race is a means for the government to classify, categorize, and divide the people. The article continues on and states that
Perhaps if someone is caught promoting terrorism and put in jail for their unpleasant act, others would be less likely to continue the promotion of terrorism, due to the fact that they have now realized they could risk wasting 5 years of their life, in jail. In any case, it 's better to be safe than sorry. Secondly, Bill C-51 will be able to stop a terroristic act before it happens, keeping the citizens of our country safe. Since police now have
They all wanted to pass Proposition 21 so that they could put these alleged dangers to society in jail and keep their communities safe. “The ‘get tough’ legislation targets Black and Latino youth specifically and generates support by playing on public anxieties about race and crime.” Proposition 21 only made the criminalization of youth more prevalent, going as far as legalizing it. Proposition 21 used language that made Latino youth the target and kept them in jail as long as possible. It made their sentences longer and allowed them to be tried as adults preventing them from receiving any lesser punishment due to their age.
Elected officials must strengthen public schools (regardless of Zip code); reach out to addicts, rather than abandon them; and partner with low-income communities, rather than ignore them”. She talked about two organizations that were made to come up with solutions to social ills within a community to help people better their lives and avoid the harsh minimal laws that were being enforced. Scheindlin uses these two institutions credibility to show that things are being done to reverse the effects that the minimal sentences law had on people. For example, if a child’s father was sentenced to jail for a petty crime, the child may follow in his/her father’s footsteps because they wouldn’t know better. This is when one of these institutions steps in in order to avoid making another criminal.
In very rare instances, the Constitution changes with the adding of amendments. Although this action is only done rarely it does still occur in our government today regardless of the rarity. This sort of action is so rare because the amount of people that must deem this proposed action to become a part of the Constitution of the United States. Congressmen on occasion do produce amendments on which they surmise vital enough to add. Proposed amendments seldom have the opportunity to be added and officially become amendments.
A city council meeting is a regular meeting where the Mayor of a city, District Attorney, and other important leaders of the community, along with members the general public meet to discuss important issues. They can bring up their concerns or questions of a specific topic, they can bring awareness to an issue, while making proposals and ordinances to better the community in which they live. And this is exactly what took place in Redding, California on October 20th 2015. I was not sure what to expect, when I started watching this meeting because I have never watched or attended a city council meeting.
Proposition 28 was passed on June 5, 2012 through the California initiative process. Proposition 28 was an initiative to amend the California Constitution. The change to the Constitution aims to reduce the amount of time a legislature can remain in the California legislature, but it would increase the total amount of time that a legislator could spend in one house to twelve years in total and it would only affect an legislators elected after June 5, 2012 (“In Depth” 2). The legislator could choose how the twelve years where spent, whether in just the Assembly, just the Senate, or any combination of the two. The legislators would still be subject to the same terms, but just the limits on them would increase.
In 1998, the growing resentment of the immigrants led to the approval of California Proposition 227, known as English Language in Public Schools Statue. Proposition 227 gave Californians the opportunities to choose whether students should or should not be taught primarily in English in public schools. When the Proposition 227 was approved, it was supported by the idea that it would be the “best way to integrate the state’s booming immigrant population