ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

647 Words3 Pages

In the following paragraph, I will describe to you the different arguments that the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had with ratifying the Constitution. Our Constitution should involve focusing on the common good and civic virtue of the people. There is no need for an overwhelming amount of power provided for the national government to where they make all of the decisions for us. A Bill of Rights would give us such things as the right to speak freely and make our own decisions that we, as a people, think is necessary for the common good. This writing will describe all of these points that support the Anti-Federalists and the reason to reject the new Constitution. For this paragraph, I will describe the common good and civic virtue that is needed for a successful and peaceful government, which would most likely a republican government. All of the the people of the U.S. need to have a voice for what is going on with interactions with other countries, declaring war, and who is going to be the next president. There is no reason for a few selected government officials to …show more content…

As I have said before, decisions that should be made by an entire country shouldn’t be made by a few, select people from the government. Those few, select people may be making the wrong decision on whether to go to war or not. All of the people want to make peace, but the government wants to attack them. Although this may be true that it’s important to give the voice to the people more, there also a separation of powers between the branches of government. The legislative branch may have representatives from each state that have an idea for a new law that may make the country better, but the executive branch, which is the president, may veto the law and send it back to the representatives until the president gets his/her way. This new Constitution does give some power to the states but very

Show More
Related

  • Primary Arguments Against Ratifying The Constitution Pros And Cons

    210 Words  | 1 Pages

    The primary argument against ratifying the constitution by the Anti-Federalists was that they imagined that the administration would be made would be too effective and they would simply be making ready for another government like the one that they had quite recently contended so energetically to free themselves from England. They likewise needed to include a Bill of Rights before endorsing the constitution and not afterward. The Pros are that the report had expressed to give trust against the unfeeling and unlawful demonstration of decision the american colonies. Freedom of development which is under Article IV. This area said the security and interminable associations and organization among the natives of the rose country.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    230 Words  | 1 Pages

    One last thing the constitution has that stopped tyranny rule was making sure the smaller states got a fair vote in congress compared to the bigger states. They had a meeting called the constitutional convention where they proposed two distinct plans. The first was the Virginia plan where they favored large states, and wanted it to be based off of population. The second one was the New jersey plan which favored small states, and gave each state an equal amount of votes. They eventually came up with the great compromise, where they proposed that congress would be composed of the senate, and the house of representatives.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitution To Replace The Articles Of Confederation

    221 Words  | 1 Pages

    The United States should adopt the Constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation. The new Constitution provides many advantages and new opportunities. First, the Constitution gives more power to the national government in many ways. For example, under the Articles the national government had to ask the states for money, but under the Constitution the government is provided with money and the power to tax. In addition, the Articles allowed states to regulate trade causing each state to tax one another's products.

    Read More

  • Objections To The Constitution Pros And Cons

    322 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. The Constitution originally lacked a Bill of Rights. George Mason from Virginia presented a proposal to add a bill of rights to the document. But his offer was voted down.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Cases: Bands V. United States

    1408 Words  | 6 Pages

    It is a civil responsibility for the citizens to ensure that out commander in chief does not take advantage of the power he holds. The government has made people dependent they lure their political ideologies through mass media that is bias therefore communicating only what they want the public to know. Actions taken by previous and current president have affected the trust the people the political ideology they have in the government, “ The decline in public trust among Americans is striking, public trust in government has declined and Americans are now more likely to feel that they can do little to influence the governments’ actions”

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    616 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are countless Arguments both for and against the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. Some of the main arguments of the Federalist include that a strong National government offered protection for the people’s rights, the government would benefit from a 3 branch system and a system of checks and balances needed to be created. Some of the main ideas of the anti-federalist were that the National Government would have too much power, a Bill of Right needed to be added, the constitutions effect of the government would be too tyrannical, and that the federal court system would be too powerful. Considered the Father of the Constitution, James Madison was detrimental in the creation In the US Constitution.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

    1511 Words  | 7 Pages

    Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    959 Words  | 4 Pages

    he Constitutional Convention was composed of men of strong principal; men with firm opinions and the education to support those views. Their patriotism and analytical prowess fueled the Convention and its countless debates, resulting in months of writing and perfecting the document that serves as our nation’s foundation. The delegates’ intensity caused them to continue haggling over details up until just days before the Constitution was completed. Such was the case on September 14th, 1787, a mere three days before the Constitution was sent off for ratification. Several issues were raised for discussion that day, including that of impeachment, the publication of all the proceedings of the lower house of Congress, and the appointment of a national

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution

    760 Words  | 4 Pages

    ln the two-hundred & forty years since its founding, the United States of America has grown from several colonies banding together for survival to a great world superpower with significant influence in world affairs. The backbone of this nation's success can be found in its Constitution, the document that defines the properties of the country's branched government, guidelines for laws, and rights for its citizens. Under the Constitution, the U.S. has prospered. lt has, in more recent years, exposed some flaws; such as antiquated language and outdated processes, but they are easily fixed.

    Read More

  • Ratifying The Constitution Pros And Cons

    323 Words  | 2 Pages

    These past few years have been some troubling ones. Since the revolution and the ratification of the Articles of Confederation our country has been in a state of limbo. For every step forward our country attempts to make, we end up taking a giant leap back to where we began. Recently, our founding-fathers have taken part in a convention and have began discussing the idea of a new constitution- a new way of structuring our government. This constitution, however, has been lacking in support from some very crucial states due to the lack of a Bill of Rights, which would address the individual rights of a citizen.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

    635 Words  | 3 Pages

    Daniel Webster once said, “The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions,” meaning that the constitution prevents higher ranking people to carry out a plan for the benefit of themselves or others. The Constitution was written in 1787, it is a set of laws that the people, government, and any form of leader would have to follow. It also guards against tyranny, meaning it prevents harsh absolute power in the hands of one individual like a king or a dictator, or when several generals or religious leaders seize control. Tyranny can also be caused by the many, the majority denies the rights of the minority. The “Constitution Mini-Q, page 95” wrote, “for Madison and his few delegates, the challenge was to write a constitution that was strong enough to hold the states and the people together without letting any one person, group, branch, or level of government gain too much control.”

    Read More

  • Amending The Constitution Pros And Cons

    711 Words  | 3 Pages

    Article Five of the United States Constitution clearly spells out ways to amend the document as so desired by Congress or the States. Regarding this specific topic, there have been recent debates over whether there should be a Constitutional Convention comprised of state legislatures developed for the sole purpose of bypassing congress in amending the Constitution. Before I watched the debate, I decided against this notion as I personally do not have any knowledge, presently, of how to amend the constitution. Therefore, there should not be a convention to do just that. Although the opposing side brought some real issues to light regarding the ideas of “Draining the Swamp”, using “True Democracy” for one person equals one vote/one state equals one vote, and stating that re-electing new congressional officials hasn’t changed anything either.

    Read More

  • Bill Of Rights Dbq

    366 Words  | 2 Pages

    Not everyone agrees with the government or if we should even have a government. What's the point of having rules, laws, someone in charge of running who could be unqualified? Each person in the government is protected by having for too much power. Every single person that has something to do with the federal government has some sort of power of someone. John Dickinson wrote The Articles of Confederation which were very weak and a disappointed to our country.

    Read More

  • The Constitution Pros And Cons

    567 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our Constitution, written by James Madison, has been a solid piece of American history since 1787. The founding fathers had created the Constitution to establish the fundamental principles of our country. 229 years later, after many presidents, senators, representatives and notorious events, very little has changed. Thomas Jefferson wrote, “...no society can make a perpetual constitution... If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force and not of right” (7).

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Ratification Of The Constitution

    452 Words  | 2 Pages

    History is written by the victors, is a common saying used to describe the inequality of information available from different viewpoints of an issue. This idea holds true when it comes to the United State’s Constitution. For years, American students are taught all the positives of the document with little attention to the negatives. But those against the ratification of the Constitution, the Anti-federalists, had valid issues with the Constitution, some of which are still relevant almost 230 years in the future. The Constitution, legally speaking, shouldn’t even have been created.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

Open Document