Should Renewable Energy Replace Fossil Fuels

Although it is a valid point that Fossil Fuels are easier to power America with due to years of experimentation, the environmental drawbacks out way the gain. Essentially, if America invested more into experimentation with renewable energy it could be perfected and suited for the growing need. For this reason, opponents argue that it will ultimately be more cost effective to invest in the development of sustainable energy. Furthermore, renewable energy is cheaper to sustain once properly integrated with global infrastructure. Ultimately, Renewable energy (with enough effort) can potentially keep up with energy

“And our economy runs on fossil fuels. We need oil for transportation we need natural gas for things like fertilizer, and petrochemicals. And we need coal for things like steel.” Another issue with energy independence is that we tend to use more than is initiated at home. When referring to natural gas and oil, over half comes from the American soil and the other comes from overseas. Wind and solar energy only make up two percent of the electricity outgo and the smart cars are not as popular as manufacturers hoped.

Nuclear power is one solution to the problem of greenhouse gases. Moore (2005), the founder and chief scientist of Green Spirit Strategies, states that “a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) seems unlikely given our continued heavy reliance on fossil fuels. An investment in nuclear energy would go a long way to reducing this reliance and could actually result in reduced CO2 emissions from power generation” . He also speculates that nuclear energy would be a solution to securing the United States’ energy and meeting the energy demands of the nation. Nuclear would play a large role in reducing the greenhouse emissions and solve the climate problem in order to assure that there would not be an escalation in global warming (Knapp et al, 2010).

One example of the indirect economy effect is the generation of electricity. Over the years, because of the increase in oil and natural gas, Plants involved in the generation of electricity have switched some input of coal to natural gas. This makes it easier for the environment because it reduces people’s exposure to compounds like carbon-monoxide, ammonia gas and other dangerous compounds. Also, along with the increase in the production of natural gas, prices on getting them by individuals have

Carbon dioxide is mainly produced by burning of fossil fuel either by cars or factories. Humans need a way to reduce the concentration of CO2 in the atmospheric. By using carbon dioxide as the gas source in enhanced oil recovery, we can reduce CO2 that being is being released to the atmosphere. However, every method has its own respective negative impacts too. Thus, by using carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery, oil and gas companies can increase the oil production and reduced the emission of carbon dioxide into atmosphere but it will also lead to increase in investment.

Fossil Fuels are the prime source of greenhouse gases. According to Ferguson, (2007, p6-7), In order to diminish climate change, the world will need to use sources which do not emit greenhouse gases as well as are

Coal has been the favoured source for energy generation for centuries, due to its reliability and relatively low cost. However, with coal reserves slowly diminishing due to the ever-increasing demand for energy, renewable energy sources are becoming more popular. Renewable energy is energy harvested through natural processes like sunlight and wind. These sources are replenished faster than they are consumed, and the methods used to convert them to energy do not create any pollution. Simple applications involving renewable energies range from using biomass (wood and animal dung) to fuel fires, to harnessing the power of wind in sails on ships to using the sun’s energy to grow plants in greenhouses.

The only difference comes in the fact that in electric vehicles, they have more of them which are used to power the engine. Electric cars are entirely charged by the electricity you provide, which means you don’t need to buy gas again. Driving cars that need gas can burn a hole in your pocket. With electric cars, this cost can be avoided as an average person spends $2000 to $4000 on gas each year. Though electricity isn’t free, an electric car is far cheaper to run.

has over 3,000 MW installed geothermal capacity – more than any other country in the world – and this number will continue to grow in the coming years. According to the Department of Commerce, geothermal is one of only two renewables that exports more than it imports in the United States. Geothermal equipment manufacturers and service providers exist in almost every state and are able to provide jobs in places like Kentucky or Oklahoma and then export their good Geothermal projects produce energy for decades at stable, affordable prices. Viewed in terms of life cycle costs, geothermal power is economically attractive, providing the lowest cost renewable power and providing long-term fixed power prices. This also reduces price volatility, helping to avoid price spikes and energy crises, which can impose severe economic penalties on business and local communities.

When producing plastic, you need to have petroleum and natural gas. (Macklin, 2016). Petroleum and natural gas are both fossil fuels, meaning that when using they produce an excess of carbon dioxide. Too much carbon dioxide can have detrimental effects on the world including global warming and climate change. The usage of plastic emits between 100-500 million tons of CO2 every year.