Some critics feel that there are advantages to single sex schools, and the students attendance rate. “Boys in single sex classes had better attendance than those in coeducational classes” (Rich). The problem with this statement is the fact that the author didn’t take note of the two schools they were comparing, or where the schools were located. For example, if the schools were located on two completely opposite sides of town, the nicer school is obviously going to have the better attendance rates. Another argument for single sex schools is that boys test scores were generally lower than girls in coed classes.
Of the cons of single-sex education listed in a 2013 report by Connecticut’s State Education Resource Center, two of the first listed were the promotion of stereotypes and the undermining of gender equality that came with the separation. As well, it mentioned that this single-sex system doesn’t prepare students for work or family life in the real world, as you cannot afford to only work with one gender. Yes, a lot of supporters agree that this system puts less pressure on female students to strive towards things such as arithmetic as they mature. However, that comment in itself undermines the goal of single-sex education by stating that females can’t succeed in a normal setting, despite how this is falsely proven. It puts kids in a situation where they grow up believing that the other gender is so different that they can’t survive and work together, which can be detrimental after they graduate, where the child will have to deal with men, women, and even those who identify with both or neither.
Mixed schools are more economical to the government and academically the best. Reference list - Single-sex Education: What Does Research Tell Us? by Emer Smith June 2010 - (Single-sex Schooling and Academic Attainment at School and through the Life course Working Paper 2008/3 May 2008 ,Alice Sullivan, Heather Joshi, Diana
The Solution to Single-Sex Vs. Co-Ed Classes Does the choice, single-gender vs. coeducation in schools, make a difference? Could one benefit students more than the other? Single-sex education was popular up until the 19th century, where it gradually became unpopular in all schools, minus private and parochial schools. It’s now on the rise again as school directors search for ways to improve academic performance. Many people, teachers, parents, students, have many different opinions on the topic and schools have to decide which one is a better option, leaving the curriculum as it is, or changing over to single-sex.
Modern education has shown impressive results in the growth of females in predominantly-male fields. However, primary and secondary education should focus on encouraging students and identifying extraordinary skills, regardless of the students’
Students will have a more relaxed learning experience without distractions from the opposite gender. Boys and girls can freely express themselves without “fear of embarrassment or feelings of inadequacy [that] may accompany the co-ed classroom experience” (Source #3). In single-sex classrooms, students also do not have to worry about impressing the other gender. For example, many students from both genders place much attention on their physical appearance, sometimes in hopes of impressing the opposite gender. Students can instead focus on their studies and schoolwork in a single-sex educational environment since many of these schools require a school uniform.
would you like to see your child in a single sex school ? single sex schools are a very real thing among us today . people started looking towards single sex schools much more often these days . most probably the parents of the female students try to separate their "purchase baby girls " from violent boys and the parents of the male students try to make them grow up in a more tough environment to make sure he grows a " man " . single sex schools has caused huge controversy between people .
The fact that these schools are single sex only the tend to provide subjects based on the students they house leaving girls with only the choice from the traditional “female” subjects to study and likewise boys have only the traditional “male subjects” to choose from. According the Department of Education and Science (2007) this trend of gender typical subject take-ups follow through to third level education. Areas of specialization continue to be gender linked with mathematics, engineering, and the physical and biological sciences being dominated by males and the
Those who disagree if sex education should be taught in schools argues that it is not the place of school to talk about sex. It is belong to parent’s responsibility because they know what information is needed by their children. In any case, many parents feel not comfortable to talk it. It seems that most parents are either strongly against or strongly in favor of sex education classes, but very few parents are in the middle ground. Moreover, most students are mature enough to handle a sex education course, but sex education should not be