ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Socrates

280 Words2 Pages

Socrates is trying to test the point that no individual aspires to do or want things that are bad for this. This is because he states that no individuals yearns to be miserable and unhappy. This, undeniably, is true. However, even though no individual wishes to be miserable and unhappy, people do wish to make other individuals miserable and unhappy. What Socrates fails to see is that countless amounts of individuals wish to do bad deeds and hurt others, however, they themselves do not want to be made unhappy throughout that process. Example of these types of people are terrorists. On the other hand, teenagers seeking to emotionally abuse a friend can be seen under this category. This is because even though they wish to hurt their friend, they mistakingly believe that the friendship will remain intact. …show more content…

One includes, “ Do you mean that they believe the bad things to be good, or that they know they are bad and nevertheless desire them,” to which Meno replies, “I think there are both kinds.” (Meno) This quote is fantastic as it is very prevalent in today’s society. An example is that many fellow Americans have goals, however, there any many ways to obtain these goals that are not morally just. With that said, however, many individuals are not aware that the choices they make are unjust and morally deplorable. Another great excerpt is, “Is it clear then that those who do not know things to be bad do not desire what is bad, but they desire those things that they believe to be good but that are in fact bad.”

Show More
Related

  • Socrates A Good Statesman Analysis

    2334 Words  | 10 Pages

    In Plato's Gorgias, it is apparent that Socrates has no desire to be a good statesman as it is defined in the eyes of the Athenians. His calculation is that Athenian rhetoricians place no reliance on facts or truth, nor are these their aim. Instead, they rely on the illusion of knowledge, and this morally weakens both themselves and their audiences. It is clear however, that if he wishes, Socrates is able to match most or all of the other statesmen in Athens, as is clearly indicated by his very eloquent speech which ends the dialogue. Additionally, under his own definition of a good statesman, it is evident that Socrates is more than qualified.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Euthyphro And Socrates

    484 Words  | 2 Pages

    HUM2225 Dr. Hotchkiss September 30, 2016 Moral Insight Plato’s Euthyphro is based on a lesson between Socrates and Euthyphro outside of the Athenian court about the definition of pious or impious. Euthyphro was surprised to see Socrates there and even more curious to find out why he was there. Socrates explained that the court was persecuting him for impiety because Meletus was spreading rumors about him corrupting the Athenian youth. Euthyphro explains to Socrates that he was there to prosecute his father for murdering a farm worker named Dionysus.

    Read More

  • Conceptual Reconstruction: The Dialogue Of The Crito, By Plato

    1421 Words  | 6 Pages

    Crito gives three different reasons for this statement. One is that Socrates will be doing what his enemies intended for him to do. Next, Socrates is failing to raise and educate his children if he agrees

    Read More

  • Alcibiades Speech On Ladder Of Love

    1745 Words  | 7 Pages

    This could mean that Socrates had understood, or at least on the way to understanding what is the good and how to obtain it. This interpretation also explain Socrates´s behavior, as recounted by Alcibiades. Socrates spend most of his time either thinking(220D), or talking and philosophizing with others(221D, 222E).He seem to show extreme calmness and unrivaled self control( 221B). He does not desire physical beauty, money,power, or anything else that Alcibiades might be interested in(216E), and seem to only be concerned about giving speeches and

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Socrates And Snowden

    1280 Words  | 6 Pages

    Socrates & Snowden Socrates was a true believer that true pleasure only comes when individuals live a moral life. He believed that an individual’s inner life, or the soul, is the most important part of life. Each person must keep his or her soul healthy, by seeking truth, self-knowledge, justice, and goodness. Socrates believed that any soul in search of fame, wealth, and power becomes ignorant, sickly, and weak (Claudia, 270). He was concerned with strengthening his inner self by examining and criticizing it.

    Read More

  • Plato's Republic: Just Or Unjust?

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    I think that there is a fallacy of irrelevance. In the book, Socrates sets out to defend the idea that it is always in one’s best interest to be just and to act justly and he suggests that the just person as one who has a balanced soul will lead one to act justly or why mental health amounts to justice. I feel that justice includes actions in relation to others, it includes considerations of other people’s good, and includes strong motivations not to act unjustly. I believe that Socrates’ defense of justice does not include constraining reasons to think that a person with a balanced soul will refrain from acts that are commonly thought to be unjust like theft, murder, and adultery.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Socrates: Four Dialogues, By Plato

    1595 Words  | 7 Pages

    Socrates is quoted as stating, “An unexamined life is a life not worth living” (38 a). Socrates was a founding figure of western philosophy, and a stable for many ideas. He lived in Athens, Greece teaching his students, like Plato, questioning politics, ethical choices, and many other things in Greek society. In the Trial and death of Socrates: Four Dialogues by Plato, it explores the abstract questioning Socrates had towards many of the normal social properties, which led to his trial, resulting in his death. The most important aspects discussed in the dialogues is the questioning of what is pious and impious, what it means to be wise, and good life.

    Read More

  • Socrates Injustice And Injustice Analysis

    1006 Words  | 5 Pages

    Socrates in his dialogue was pushing further with the idea that it is worse to do injustice than to suffer injustice, a clime which was objected by Polus. For Polus says that many people who do injustice are happy, but Socrates insists otherwise. Socrates focuses on Eudaimonia, which means happiness, as the main objective to reach. Thus the people who do injustice like kings and tyrants are unhappy. Socrates then asks Polus which is more shameful doing injustice or suffering it, and Polus replies that doing injustice is more shameful.

    Read More

  • Analyzing Socrates Argument In Plato's Meno

    1060 Words  | 5 Pages

    The world we live in is filled with crime, evil, and injustice, but do people have the desire to do bad things knowing that they are bad, or do they do them thinking that they are good? In this essay, I examine Socrates argument, found in Plato’s Meno, that no one knowingly desires bad things. If Socrates were right, it would mean that it is impossible for someone to perform a bad action based on their desire for that bad thing. Instead, all bad desires result from the ignorance of the person performing the action in falsely believing that the action is good. Though Socrates presents a compelling argument, I argue that it is possible for someone to act badly, all the while knowing that what they desire is bad.

    Read More

  • Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

    1382 Words  | 6 Pages

    Socrates bases this view of justice on the worth of living a good life. “And is life worth living for us with that part of us corrupted by unjust actions” (47e) If we corrupt our soul with injustice, our life would not be worth living, therefore one must never commit an injustice. “When one has come to an agreement that is just with someone, one should fulfill it.”(49e) It is this agreement with the Laws that Socrates would be violating, if he were to

    Read More

  • The Wisdom Of Socrates In The Apology

    952 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the end, Socrates declares that it is better to suffer an injustice than to commit one and he is willing to accept the punishment the court deems fit. He refuses to compromise his beliefs and values, no matter the

    Read More

  • Socrates: A Threat To The Athenian Society

    912 Words  | 4 Pages

    Socrates started his life as an average Athen citizen. His parents worked, making an honest living. But as Socrates grew up, he began to realize that his mind questioned things and wondered how come no one else questioned the same things or at least think about the answers to the questions that were not answered. So, as his mind kept wandering, he began to acknowledge the questions that were not answered and sought for those answers. He ended up believing and teaching things to other people, whether it went against the way the Athen government or not, he still continued his work.

    Read More

  • Socrates Major Thinkers Of Ancient Philosophy

    1870 Words  | 8 Pages

    Cover Letter This paper was written for the “Major Thinkers of Ancient Philosophy” course that I took in the Fall of 2015. The assignment was to survey the works of Plato and the works of Aristotle that had been read in class and provide a paper arguing for an interpretation of our chosen selections. More than just providing our own thoughts on the passage, however, we were challenged to engage with relevant scholarship in order to produce an informed interpretation of the passage.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Socrates

    1303 Words  | 6 Pages

    Leading up to and throughout the trial, Socrates is provided with numerous opportunities to avoid conviction and the death sentence he receives. However, since Socrates had too much hu-bris and was a firm believer in the “death before dishonor” mantra, he refused to attempt to sway the jury through argumentum ad passiones, which was customary. Instead, Socrates opted to uti-lize valid arguments, that were rooted in logic as a means of convincing the jury of his innocence. Nevertheless, had Socrates ceased practicing philosophy publicly prior to the trial, appealed to the jury’s emotions during trial, or suggested a tougher punishment to the jury, he would have successfully avoided his fated conviction and eventual death sentence. The simplest method Socrates could have used to prevent the conviction he received would be to cease practicing philosophy in public, similar to the Pre-Socratics who preceded him

    Read More

  • A Look In The World Of Socrates

    551 Words  | 3 Pages

    Adriana Silva History 1101 11/25/2014 Grossmont, online Classical Greek Philosophy: A look in the world of Socrates Classical Greek philosophy began developing during the period of classical Greece, which begun around 500 B.C.E. The first hint at philosophy is known as the pre-Socratic tradition, which is philosophy preceding Socrates himself. The next tier was the sophist tradition, which included Socrates which is, “…most well known philosopher of all time” (Feres, ch.5, pg. 119). Both helped create different methods of critical thinking and helped shaped the thinking of the society in Athens during the classical Greek period.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Socrates

Open Document