Sports scholarships can help students who can't afford to go to college, get a better education. Sports scholarships are for students who excel in a sport, and a college will give the student money to play their sport at their college. This is amazing for students but there are various downsides. Sometimes the scholarship can be a hindrance for the student causing them not to reach their academic potential. Sports scholarships are also rare and can be a false hope for families not able to afford college. Some people like Ralph Nader, a famous politician, and a presidential candidate. Thinks that we should get rid of sports scholarships. What are the benefits of sports scholarships.? What are the disadvantages of sports scholarships? College is not for everyone. Some people don't …show more content…
Ralph Nader was a presidential candidate and is a member of the League Of Fans. League of fans is a sport reform project founded by Ralph Nader. Sports scholarships is a controversial issue with many pros and cons. Take a step back and look at how sports have changed. You’ll see “An entire industry that has developed in the youth sports arena -- club teams, personal trainers, etc. -- to prey on families' dreams of an athletic scholarship," (Ralph Nader). In our own town, this is apparent. There's plenty of athletic kids who have their own personal trainer, who train so they can make it big in sports. The lure of athletic scholarship can be harmful due to kids training their whole life and then not receiving one can cause toxic and harmful behaviors in kids and adults. According to CNBC, when parents dream of being an athlete is pushed onto their children, this can create a serious problem in kids. They say that the parents constantly forcing children to be the best and become “D1 bound” and the child not succeeding in getting a sports scholarship, can cause depression, and even suicidal thoughts. Even with a sports scholarship, how is life in college with
College sports are a major part of American culture. College athletes devote hours upon hours a week to their sports training, but unfortunately, sports can take up a lot of time and distract from other important activities. This can harm academics, as athletes have to balance sports and academics, especially at a college. Participating in sports is almost like working a part-time job and having to balance school too which can be difficult to do, and focus may be rendered on one task and not both. Furthermore, athletes will be on scholarships too, which is why college athletes should not be paid.
Should College Athletes Be Paid? There has been much debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Can one imagine college athletes receiving pay for play on top of all the money they are given to attend that college? College athletes should not receive payment for play.
Frank Deford has numerous opinionated claims in his article; however, he lacks organization, proof to his claims, and a professional tone. Deford first reminds the audience of the speech he gave in the past about collegiate athletes being the only students to receive genuine scholarships. Next, He explains Brand’s stance on the issue. Brand
Have you ever wondered if a college athlete should or shouldn’t get paid? Well the truth is that, the athletes don’t see their fair share even if they’re one of the best players on the team. Many believe that scholarships cover the fact that college athletes don’t get paid.
Although, what they fail to realize is they lose sight of what is important. That is, it is important for their children to enjoy the sport and for the parents to not get caught up in the hype that the child will one day be a professional athlete. They are kids; they need to be able
Their leadership skills and exceptional academic accomplishments, however, are usually disregarded or undervalued because sometimes they are viewed as assets to the university for their athletic abilities opposed to their academic abilities. The term “student-athlete” implies that college athletes should prioritize their education in addition to athletics. In practice, a lot of athletes are forced to put their sports commitments above their academic commitments, which could potentially defeat the whole point of the term “student-athlete.” This could occur in an environment where students are seen and treated more as athletes than students could stem from athletes being encouraged to prioritize their sport above academics. An outcome of putting too much emphasis on athletic performance and development than educational or personal development, this could deprive student athletes of the benefits of attending college and receiving a college education and contradict the original meaning of “student-athlete".
A lot of sports recruits come from the inner city, country or a humble environment. Going to college is a completely new and different experience. A large portion of players are trying to adjust in the classroom and feel inferior in more ways than we care to realize. Many of the students at major universities in the United States typically come from families that have incomes that are above the national average. These players are asked to come to the college’s where they are not socially equal but they are expected to feel good about the situation and themselves.
Not every college athlete makes it professionally, which means that many athletes needs to prepare for a career in something else. Injuries cut athletes careers short, even among thoses who become professional. By providing scholarship to many people who would not otherwise be able to attend college, college athletes do a great service in our country. College athletics are important and worthwhile because they contribute immeasurably to the pleasure that students get from attending college.
The NCAA Shouldn’t Compensate College Athletes Ever since the creation of collegiate sports, the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) has been under discussion weather to pay college athletes in addition to their scholarships. The topic heated up in 1973 when the NCAA came out with a rule that set a limit to the amount of scholarships an athletic program can offer to students. This started speculations that the NCAA was being unfair to students deserving of the scholarships. With college sports growing to colossal levels since then and generating billions of dollars along the way, many are arguing that it is time for the NCAA to share their revenue with the athletes who help get them that money. Paying collegiate athletes
Imagine if you were part of the reason for a collegiate team’s success in win and filling up stadiums, but not having enough money to get your necessities. That is what’s happening to a lot of student-athletes, even some pros have commented on this idea. First off, most college athletes barely have money as it is, so if they run short on money, they aren’t able to call their parents or whoever they lived with to send money to them, then they can’t eat or even worst, they have nowhere to live. Many NFL or other professional athletes would agree that college players should get paid mostly because of lack of free time. “I would love for a regular student, for just one semester, to have a student-athlete schedule during the season and show me
This notion is supported by Dr. Daniel Gould, who believes that “Children who participate in sports have increased educational aspirations, closer ties to school and increased occupational aspirations in youth” (1). People against the funding of high school sports think that parents and society are placing more emphasis than ever before and, “[P]ressures athletic personnel to deviate on winning from the athlete- centered educational and personal development mission” (Gould 1). However, athletes strive to do better in class. Michael Lorenc, a high school basketball coach believes that “those who seem to have an overwhelming schedule where they’re playing maybe multiple sports, and high academic schedules, they tend to do better than those who don’t do anything extracurricularly” (Gray). Balancing sports and school makes athletes put more effort into keeping up grades while playing the sport they love.
The benefits of this is that this would cover all of the extra costs that the scholarship does not provide and creates a truly free college experience for the athletes. This would also slowly the give the players access to their finances, with less money directly available to them. With less money to spend immediately, athletes would be more likely to make better choices with their money and how they spend it. However, this process runs into the Title IX wall as well, with hardly any other program besides men’s football and basketball being able to afford to give all their players
Reasons Why or Why Not?” author Unknown goes over the NCAA vs. Alston ruling, which is when colleges were given the power to reward their athletes for their name, image, and likeness. They then explain why student athletes are not being paid by their schools, and what a name, image, and likeness agreement is. It is then written how student athlete scholarships actually work and what the difference is between a full versus a partial scholarship. They then list cons of paying college athletes, like how scholarships are the fairest form of compensation for them and how paying athletes diminishes the spirit of
There could be controversy over the athlete's contract with the amount they are getting paid. Also, the kids that do not play sports might feel they are being treated unfairly because they do not get paid. College athletes get offered a full ride to a big ten college for free: “other kids have to get loans worth tons of money that they will have to pay back for the rest of their lives” (Bagaria and Birkenes). Paying these athletes would cause too many problems that the university doesn’t have time to deal with. College is a place that people decide to go to because they enjoy everything the campus has to offer and to get a degree.
Have you ever thought about how those hardworking college athletes get through their years attending their University? Well, what if I told you that those athletes can barely get the essentials needed day by day because the scholarships they have received do not cover it and they don 't have any other money to buy it themselves. The debate whether or not College athletes should be paid for their time at the university they attend has been talked about a lot in these past years. Some people think that they should not be paid, but today I’m going to be telling you about why they should be paid. Athletes that are very well known by the fans of the university and or with lots of other people around the world like Lonzo Ball of UCLA, Dillon Brooks of Oregon, Markelle Fultz of Washington, etc.